Trust and the law in international child abduction cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1346Keywords:
Trust, Transnationalisation, Sociology of Law, International Child AbductionAbstract
This article seeks to grasp the legal category of international child abduction through the conceptual lens of trust, from the standpoint of judges. In a more ambitious way, we delve into the relationship between law and trust in the context of the transnationalisation of family law. Going beyond the legal principle of mutual trust, we propose a solid conceptualisation of the notion of trust drawn from sociological theory and we analyse the issues that arises for judges both at the institutional and interactional levels. At the institutional level, we show how trust operates as a procedural mechanism that allows cooperation in the absence of explicit moral consensus, whilst at the interactional level, we demonstrate that trust is imbued with ethical value and pushes judges to be more open to foreign laws and culture.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
14(1)_Struelens_OSLS 201
XML_14(1)_Struelens_OSLS 10
References
Allard, J., and Garapon, A., 2005. Les juges dans la mondialisation: La nouvelle révolution du droit. Paris: Seuil.
Anagnostaras, G., 2016. Mutual confidence is not blind trust! Fundamental rights protection and the execution of the European arrest warrant: Aranyosi and Caldararu. Common Market Law Review, 53(6), 1675–1704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2016146
Bartolini, S., 2019. In the Name of the Best Interest of the Child: The Principle of Mutual Trust in Child Abduction Cases. Common Market Law Review, 56 (1), 1–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2019005
Battjes, H., et al., 2011. The Principle of Mutual Trust in European Asylum, Migration, and Criminal law. Utrecht: Meijers Committee.
Berman, P.S., 2005. From International Law to Law and Globalization. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 43(2), 485–556.
Brouwer, E., 2013. Mutual Trust and the Dublin Regulation: Protection of Fundamental Rights in the EU and the Burden of Proof. Utrecht Law Review, 9(1), 135–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.218
C.J.E.U, Zarraga, 22 December 2010, aff. C-491/10 PPU, point 70.
Cornu, L., 2006. La confiance comme relation émancipatrice. In: A. Ogien and L. Quéré, eds., Les moments de la confiance: Connaissance, affects et engagements. Paris: Economica, 169–190.
Cotterrell, R., 2008. Transnational Communities and the Concept of Law. Ratio Juris, 21 (1), 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2007.00377.x
Frederiksen, M., 2016. Divided uncertainty: a phenomenology of trust, risk and confidence. In: S. Jagd and L. Fuglsang, eds., Trust, Organizations and Social Interaction. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 43–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783476206.00011
Frederiksen, M., and Heinskou, M.B., 2016. Trusting the other or taking a chance? An investigation of chance and trust temporalities. Time & Society, 25(2), 374–392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X15577267
Gambetta, D., ed., 1988. Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. Cambridge, MA: Basic Blackwell.
Hague Conference on Private International Law (HccH), 2022. Status table. 28: Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction [online]. Last update: 14 September 2022. Available at: https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/status-table/?cid=24
Hague Conference on Private International Law (HccH), 2023. Status table. Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Status on: 27 February 2023 [online]. Available at: https://assets.hcch.net/docs/33bba6da-cb14-4c0e-bdc0-826c56051633.pdf
Hanley, P., 2016. Black Hole in the Rising Sun: Japan and the Hague Convention on Child Abduction. International Human Rights Law Journal, 2(1), 1–22.
Hardin, R., 2002. Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Karpik, L., 2006. Pour une conception substantive de la confiance. In: A. Ogien and L. Quéré, eds., Les moments de la confiance: Connaissance, affect et engagements. Paris: Economica, 109–117.
Kramer, X., 2011. Cross Border Enforcement in the EU: Mutual Trust Versus Fair Trial? Towards Principles of European Civil Procedure. International Journal of Procedure Law, 1(2), 202–230.
Lowe, N., 2011. A statistical analysis of applications made in 2008 under The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, National Report (Prel. Doc. No 8 C). May. Hague Conference on Private International Law.
Luhmann, N., 2006. La confiance: Un mécanisme de réduction de la complexité sociale. Paris: Economica.
Luhmann, N., 2017. Trust and Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Mangematin, V., and Thuderoz, C., eds., 2004. Des mondes de confiance: Un concept à l’épreuve de la réalité sociale. Paris: CNRS . DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionscnrs.7279
Maoli, F., et al., 2020. Understanding the Best Interests of the Child in EU Child Abduction Proceedings: Perspectives from the Case Law. Diritti umani e diritto internazionale, 14(2), 337–363.
McEleavy, P., 2015. The European Court of Human Rights and the Hague Child Abduction Convention: Prioritising Return or Reflection? Netherlands International Law Review, 62(3), 365–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-015-0040-z
Mitsilegas, V., 2012. The limits of mutual trust in Europe’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: from automatic inter-state cooperation to the slow emergence of the individual. Yearbook of European Law, 31(1), 319–372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yes023
Mitsilegas, V., 2015. The Symbiotic Relationship between Mutual Trust and Fundamental Rights in Europe’s Area of Criminal Justice. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 6(4), 457–480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/203228441500600410
Möllering, G., 2001. The Nature of Trust: From Georg Simmel to a Theory of Expectation, Interpretation and Suspension. Sociology, 35(2), 403–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0038038501000190
Nooteboom, B., 2006. Apprendre à faire confiance. In: A. Ogien and L. Quéré, eds., Les moments de la confiance: Connaissance, affects et engagements. Paris: Economica, 63–85.
Ogien, A., 2006. Éléments pour une grammaire de la confiance. In: A. Ogien and L. Quéré, eds., Les moments de la confiance: Connaissance, affects et engagements. Paris: Economica, 217–232.
Pérez-Vera, E., 1980. Rapport explicatif sur la Convention de La Haye de 1980 sur l’enlèvement international d’enfants. Hague Conference on Private International Law, No. Actes et documents de la Quatorzième session, t. III, Enlèvement d'enfants. Hague Conference on Private International Law.
Pfeiff, S., 2016. L’enlèvement international d’enfants dans l’Union européenne : la fin du retour immédiat ? In: L. Barnich et al., eds., Le Droit des relations familiales internationales à la croisée des chemins. Brussels: Larcier, 149–177.
Quéré, L., 2001. La structure cognitive et normative de la confiance. Réseaux, 108(4), 125–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/res.108.0125
Quéré, L., 2005. Les « dispositifs de confiance » dans l’espace public. Réseaux, 132(4), 185–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/res.132.0185
Quéré, L., 2013. La confiance comme attitude pratique. Occasional Paper, 15. Paris: Institut Marcel Mauss, 1–25.
Rawls, A.W., 2012. Durkheim’s theory of modernity: Self-regulating practices as constitutive orders of social and moral facts. Journal of Classical Sociology, 12(3–4), 479–512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X12454476
Rizcallah, C., 2019a. Le principe de confiance mutuelle : une utopie malheureuse ? Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme, 118(2), 297–322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rtdh.118.0297
Rizcallah, C., 2019b. The challenges to trust‐based governance in the European Union: Assessing the use of mutual trust as a driver of EU integration. European Law Journal, 25(1), 37–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12303
Schuz, R., 2013. The Hague child abduction convention: A critical analysis. Oxford: Hart.
Schwarz, M., 2018. Let’s talk about trust, baby! Theorizing trust and mutual recognition in the EU’s area of freedom, security and justice. European Law Journal, 24(2–3), 124–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12268
Simmel, G., 2009. Secrets et sociétés secrètes. Paris : Circe.
Struelens, O., 2020a. « Kafka n’est pas loin, sauf quand les juges se tiennent la main » : confiance institutionnelle et transnationalisation du droit familial. Revue interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques, 84(1), 5–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/riej.084.0005
Struelens, O., 2020b. Le droit face à l’enlèvement parental international. La poursuite de l’intérêt de l’enfant au prisme du pluralisme juridique. In: A. Fillod-Chabaud and L. Odasso, eds., Faire et défaire les liens familiaux: Usages et pratiques du droit en contexte migratoire. Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 65–79.
Struelens, O., 2021. Le pari de la confiance : les juges et les médiateurs face à l’enlèvement parental international. Thesis (PhD). University of Louvain. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pur.149185
Sulima, A., 2013. The Normativity of The Principle of Mutual Trust Between EU Member States within the Emerging European Criminal Area. Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, 3(1), 72–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/wrlae-2013-0006
Vicini, G., 2015. The Dublin Regulation Between Strasbourg and Luxembourg: Re-Shaping Non-Refoulement in the Name of Mutual Trust? European Journal of Legal Studies, 8(2), 51–72.
Watson, R., 2009. Constitutive Practices and Garfinkel’s Notion of Trust: Revisited. Journal of Classical Sociology, 9(4), 475–499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X09344453
Whytock, C., 2014. Faith and scepticism in private international law: Trust, governance, politics, and foreign judgments. Erasmus Law Review, 3, 113–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000022
Willems, A., 2016. Mutual Trust as a Term of Art in EU Criminal Law: Revealing its Hybrid Character. European Journal of Legal Studies, 9(1), 211–249.
Wischmeyer, T., 2016. European Union and the “Principle of Mutual Trust”. German Law Journal, 17(3), 340–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200019805
Zumbansen, P., 2012. Defining the Space of Transnational Law: Legal Theory, Global Governance and Legal Pluralism. In: G. Handl, J. Zekoll and P. Zumbansen, eds., Beyond Territoriality. Nijhoff: Brill, 53–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004227095_005
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Olivier Struelens
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
