Representation, Trade Union Activity And Technologies

Jaime Cabeza Pereiro

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1014

Authors

Jaime Cabeza Pereiro Universidad de Vigo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1014

Keywords:

ICT, trade union, participation, collective bargaining, industrial action

Abstract

Labour relations have been hit deeply by information and communication technologies (ICT). A wide bibliography has described this impact on all the working conditions and in all the circumstances that surround subordinate work. However, less attention has been devoted to the realm of trade union activity, representation, participation and involvement rights, collective bargaining and industrial action. All that huge field has to be re-thought from the point of view of the technological footprint as well. It is a discussion about strategies and adaptation to the current ways of information and communication. Consequently, a problem of adaptation of labour relations players to those channels. This paper tries to answer briefly to some of those questions taking the Spanish system as an example when necessary. Spanish legislation and case-law are described and criticized as long it is necessary for the overall discussion but taking into consideration the globalized literature on this subject.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Views 255
Downloads:
PDF 120

References

Bychawska-Siniarska, D., 2017. Protecting the right to freedom of expression under the European Convention of Human Rights: A Handbook for Legal Practitioners [online]. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/handbook-freedom-of-expression-eng/1680732814 [Accessed 3 May 2018].

Cardona Rubert, M.B., 2010. La utilización de las redes sociales en el ámbito de la empresa. Revista de Derecho Social, 52, 67-77.

Crema, G., 2005. The right to strike in essential services: economic implications. Doc. 10546 [online]. Report prepared by the Committee on Economic Affairs and Development for debate in the Standing Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. Strasbourg, 11 May. Available from: http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/X2H-Xref-ViewHTML.asp?FileID=10894&lang=en [Accessed 3 May 2018].

De Stefano, V., 2017. Non-standard work and limits on freedom of association: A human rights-based approach. Industrial Law Journal [online], 46(2), 185-207. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dww034 [Accessed 3 May 2018].

Dølvik, J.E., and Jesnes, K., 2017. Nordic labour markets and the sharing economy. Report from a pilot project [online]. Nordic Council of Ministers. Available from: https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1072087/FULLTEXT02.pdf [Accessed 3 May 2018].

Greene, A.M., and Kirton, G., 2003. Possibilities for remote participation in trade unions: mobilizing women activists. Industrial Relations Journal [online], 34(4), 319-333. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2338.00278 [Accessed 3 May 2018].

Lahera Forteza, J., 2014. El impacto del teletrabajo en el Derecho del Trabajo a la luz de la nueva regulación Española. Revista Jurídica, 2(35).

Martínez Moreno, C., 2017. El ser o no ser de la huelga, el fútbol y el esquirolaje. A propósito de la STC 17/2017, de 2 de febrero, caso Telemadrid. Derecho de las Relaciones Laborales, 9, 894-902.

Newlands, G., Lutz, C., and Fieseler, C., 2017. Power in the sharing economy. Report from the EU H2020 Research project Ps2Share: Participation, Privacy, and Power in the Sharing Economy [online]. Brussels: European Commission. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christoph_Lutz/publication/316596585_Power_in_the_Sharing_Economy/links/59061f55aca272116d332d0c/Power-in-the-Sharing-Economy.pdf [Accessed 3 May 2018].

Novitz, T.A., 2015. The paradigm of sustainability in a European social context: Collective participation in protection of future interests? International Journal of Comparative Labour Law [online], 31(3), 243-262. Available from: https://research-information.bristol.ac.uk/files/47836579/IJCl_31_3_Tonia_Novitz.pdf [Accessed 3 May 2018].

Panagiotopoulos, P., 2012. Towards unions 2.0.: rethinking the audience of social media engagement, New Technology. Work and Employment, 27(3), 178-192. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00287.x [Accessed 3 May 2018].

Perritt, H.H., (with Martin H. Malin), 2000. The National Labor Relations Act in cyberspace: Union organizing in electronic workplaces University of Kansas Law Review [online], 49. Available from: https://works.bepress.com/henry_perritt/18/download/ [Accessed 3 May 2018].

Servais, J.M., 2017. The right to take industrial action and the ILO supervisory mechanism future. Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal, 38, 375.

Sierra Benítez, E.M., 2011. El contenido de la relación laboral en el teletrabajo [online]. Sevilla: Consejo Económico y Social de Andalucía, col. Premio de Investigación. March. Available from: https://idus.us.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11441/53597/El%20contenido%20de%20la%20relaci%C3%B3n%20laboral%20en%20el%20teletrabajo.pdf?sequence=1 [Accessed 3 May 2018].

Vivero Serrano, J.B., 2016. El voto electrónico en las elecciones sindicales: reconocimiento arbitral y falta de previsión normativa. Trabajo y Derecho: nueva revista de actualidad y relaciones laborales, 14, 113-116.

Wright, C.F., 2011. What role for trade unions in future workplace relations? [online]. London: Acas. September. Available from: https://www.bl.uk/britishlibrary/~/media/bl/global/business-and-management/pdfs/non-secure/w/h/a/what-role-for-trade-unions-in-future-workplace-relations.pdf [Accessed 3 May 2018].