L’efficacité symbolique et la symbolisation : perspectives pour penser la ritualisation judiciaire (The Symbolic Efficiency and the Symbolization: Perspectives to Think the Judiciary Ritualization)
Keywords:
Ritualisation judiciaire, symbolisation, efficacité symbolique, pragmatique, Judiciary Ritualization, symbolization, symbolic efficiency, pragmatic, Ritualización judicial, simbolización, eficacia simbólica, pragmáticaAbstract
L’article aborde la question de la ritualisation judiciaire en relation aux concepts de symbolisation et d’efficacité symbolique propres au champ psychanalytique et à l’anthropologie. Il s’agit donc d’une contribution théorique qui soutient que la ritualisation dans le champ juridique gagnerait à se penser pragmatiquement et no sémantiquement pour saisir son efficacité. Plus qu’interpréter le décor du rituel juridique ou les signes de la justice avec une approche herméneutique, l’article propose l’intérêt de saisir ce qui se fait à travers les signes et les paroles, l’acte qui est accompli, lequel serait au fondement de l’efficacité. L’argument invite à considérer que dans un procès juridique on peut dire des choses avec des peines, mais aussi il est possible de faire des peines avec des mots.
The article treats the question of judiciary ritualization in relation to the concepts of symbolization and symbolic efficiency specific to the psychoanalytic field and anthropology. It is therefore a theoretical contribution that sustains that ritualization in the juridical field would benefit from thinking pragmatically and not semantically to grasp its effectiveness. Rather than interpreting the setting of juridical ritual or the signs of justice with a hermeneutic approach, the article proposes the interest of grasping what is done through signs and words, the act that is accomplished. This act would be in the foundation of the efficiency of judiciary ritualization. The argument suggests that in a juridical process it is possible to say things with sentences, but also it is possible to make sentences with words.
El artículo trata el tema de la ritualización judicial en relación con los conceptos, específicos del psicoanálisis y de la antropología, de simbolización y eficacia simbólica. Es, por tanto, una contribución teórica que sostiene que la ritualización en el campo judicial ganaría si se pensara pragmáticamente y no semánticamente para comprender su eficacia. Más que interpretar la escenificación del ritual judicial o los signos de la justicia desde un enfoque hermenéutico, el artículo defiende el interés de comprender lo que se hace a través de signos y palabras, el acto que se lleva a cabo. Este acto estaría en la base de la eficacia de la ritualización judicial. La tesis que se sostiene es que en un proceso judicial se pueden decir cosas con las penas aplicadas, pero también es posible hacer penas con palabras.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0944
Downloads
Downloads:
PDF 599
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.