Avoiding or pursuing gender just transitions
The standard of review and KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2655Keywords:
Women, Equality, Climate Change, Standard of ReviewAbstract
The primary focus of gender just transition has been on the nature of work. But what is the role, if any, of law in this process? This article explores an under examined legal concept, the standard of review, through the lens of the landmark judgment, KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz v Switzerland, from the European Court of Human Rights. It argues the Court’s innovative with respect to the standard of review, creating an interrogative and deferential standard, is conceptually confusing and ill-suited to gender justice transitions. This approach alleviates male living patterns from scrutiny and continues to perpetuate women’s exclusion from the constitutional structure of the state. Drawing on feminist jurisprudence from a range of apex and regional courts as well as the empirical evidence on the impacts of climate change, it argues that courts should always calibrate the standard of review to intensely scrutinise when gender justice transition is the crux of the case.
Downloads
Metrics
Global Statistics ℹ️
|
32
Views
|
14
Downloads
|
|
46
Total
|
|
References
Albertyn, C., 2023. Radical connectedness: reproductive rights, climate change and gender equality. In: C. Albertyn et al., eds., Feminist frontiers in climate justice [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 138-164. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803923796 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803923796.00011
Alviar Garcia, H., and Olarte-Olarte, M. C., 2023. Climate change and gender in Colombia: Exploring female led struggle in the flower industry. In: C. Albertyn et al., eds., Feminist frontiers in climate justice [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 188-212. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803923796.00013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803923796.00013
Anderson, S., et al., 2023. Gender just transitions: An overview. International Institute for Environment and Development.
Berland, O., and Leroutier, M., 2025. The gender gap in carbon footprints: Determinants and implications [online]. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1920/wp.ifs.2025.5325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1920/wp.ifs.2025.5325
Campbell, M., 2021. The austerity of lone motherhood: Discrimination law and benefit reform. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies [online], 41(4), 1197. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab018
Campbell, M., 2025. Hanging in the balance: The function of achieving women’s equality [online]. Oxford: Hart. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509967902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509967902
CEDAW Committee, 2018. General recommendation No 37 on gender-related dimensions of disaster risk reduction in the context of climate change (CEDAW/C/GC/37) [online]. 13 March. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/general-comments-and-recommendations/general-recommendation-no37-2018-gender-related
Chan, C., 2024. Deference in human rights adjudication [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198921677.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198921677.001.0001
Chu, J., 2023. Explained: The 1.5 C climate benchmark. MIT News [online], 27 August. Available at: https://sustainability.mit.edu/article/explained-15-c-climate-benchmark#:~:text=%E2%80%9CWe%20are%20consumers%20of%20products,is%20so%20difficult%20to%20achieve.%E2%80%9D
Core Writing Team, Lee, H., and Romero, J., eds., 2023. Climate change 2023 synthesis report: Summary for policymakers [online]. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_SPM.pdf
Dixon, R., 2017. The core case for weak-form judicial review. Cardozo Law Review, 38(2), 2193.
Eckes, C., 2025. “It’s the democracy, stupid!”, in defence of “KlimaSeniorinnen”. ERA Forum [online], 25, 451. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-025-00828-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-025-00828-w
Elliott, M., 2015. From bifurcation to calibration. In: H. Wilberg and M. Elliott, eds., The scope and intensity of substantive review. Oxford: Hart.
Fredman, S., 1997. Women and the law [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198763239.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198763239.001.0001
Fredman, S., 2024. Care as a constitutional value. International Journal of Constitutional Law [online], 22(3), 741. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moae047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moae047
Goldblatt, B., 2026. Regenerative equality laws for a changing climate. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2623
Hanisch, C., 2024. The personal is political [online]. Available at: https://webhome.cs.uvic.ca/~mserra/AttachedFiles/PersonalPolitical.pdf
Hefti, A., 2024. Intersectional victims as agents of change in international human rights-based climate litigation. Transnational Environmental Law [online], 13(3), 610. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102524000128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102524000128
Heidegger, P., et al. 2021. Why the European green deal needs ecofeminism: Moving from gender-blind to gender-transformative policies [online]. Report. 16 July. European Environment Bureau and Women Engage for a Common Future. Available at: https://eeb.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Report-16.pdf
Hilson, C., 2024. The meaning of carbon budget within a wide margin of appreciation. Verfassungsblog [online], 11 April. Available at: https://doi.org/10.59704/8c4e66bfedce514e DOI: https://doi.org/10.59704/8c4e66bfedce514e
Kavanagh, A., 2023. The collaborative constitution [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108680929 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108680929
King, J., 2008. Institutional approaches to judicial restraint. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies [online], 28(3), 409. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqn020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqn020
King, J., 2012. Judging social rights [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051750
Klein, J. M., 2026.Climate change and separation of powers in European human rights law: Why “KlimaSeniorinnen” has been met with vigorous separation of power criticism. German Law Journal [online], 27(1), 20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2026.10209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2026.10209
Morrow, K., 2021. Tackling climate change and gender justice: Integral; not optional. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 11(1), 207. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1166
Neo, J., 2022. Constitutionalising care: How can we expand our constitutional imaginary after COVID-19? International Journal of Constitutional Law [online], 20(3), 1307. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac075
Pateman, C., 1988. The sexual contract. Stanford University Press.
Rubio-Marin, R., 2022. Global gender constitutionalism and women’s citizenship [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316819241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316819241
Tramontana, E., 2026. Environmental chronic emergencies, women’s inequality and international law. In: S. de Vido, D. Russo and E. Tramontana, eds., Gendering international legal response to environmental chronic emergencies [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 42-64. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035367795.00010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035367795.00010
UN Environment Programme, 2025. Emission gap report 2025 [online]. Available at: https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2025
UN Women, 2023. A gender-responsive just transition for people and planet [online]. Available at: https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/2023-11/policy-brief-a-gender-responsive-just-transition-for-people-and-planet-en.pdf
UN Women, 2025. How gender inequality and climate change are interconnected [online]. 21 April. https://www.unwomen.org/en/articles/explainer/how-gender-inequality-and-climate-change-are-interconnected
Walby, S., 1990. Theorising patriarchy. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
Walk, P., 2024. From parity to degrowth: Unpacking narrative of a gender-just transition. Energy Research and Social Science [online], 112, 103513. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103513
Walk, P., et al. 2021. Strengthening gender justice in a just transition: A research agenda based on a systematic map of gender in coal transitions. Energies [online], 14(18), 5985. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185985 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185985
Warren, K., 1997. Ecofeminism: Women, culture, nature. Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/1569.0
West, R., 1989. Feminism, critical social theory and law. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(59).
Whelan, E., 2021. Why do the eco-warriors pushing nappy taxes hate women so much? The New Statesman [online], 1 September. Available at: https://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2021/09/why-do-eco-warriors-pushing-nappy-taxes-hate-women-so-much
Young, A., 2009. In defence of due deference. Modern Law Review [online], 72(4), 554. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00757.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00757.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Meghan Campbell
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence and it regulates how others can use your work. Further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
