The Earth Community and Ecological Jurisprudence
Keywords:
Earth community, earth jurisprudence, ecology, legal theory, environmental philosophy, social ecology, Thomas Berry, Murray Bookchin, natural law, Comunidad de la tierra, jurisprundencia de la tierra, ecología, teoría jurídica, sociología, filosofía ambieAbstract
Legal philosophical discourse tends to be animated by some conception of self and the parameters of community. Reflecting a vast heritage of humanist philosophy and theology, western legal concepts reflect anthropocentric values. Theories of law and legal concepts promote human beings as separate to the environment and define frameworks for the exploitation of nature. Against this paradigm, environmental philosophers have sought to redefine human beings as integral members of a greater Earth community – nature is a community of subjects, not a collection of objects. This alternative conception of self carries important consequences for legal philosophy. This paper explores these consequences first by analysing the ecological conception of self and community articulated by ‘geologian’ Thomas Berry (1914-2009). Second, this paper uses Berry’s analysis to develop an ecological theory of jurisprudence. This theory connects human law with ecological integrity and holds that human law attains legal quality (in part) when enacted for the common good of the comprehensive Earth community. Throughout this analysis, the paper also highlights the limitations Berry’s philosophical and legal writing and seeks dialogue with leftist political theory.
El discurso filosófico jurídico tiende a estimularse por una concepción del individuo y por parámetros de comunidad. Como reflejo de una vasta herencia de la filosofía humanista y la teología, los conceptos jurídicos occidentales reflejan valores antropocéntricos. Teorías del derecho y conceptos legales promueven seres humanos separados del medio ambiente y definen los marcos para la explotación de la naturaleza. Frente a este paradigma, los filósofos ambientales han tratado de redefinir los seres humanos como miembros de una comunidad de la Tierra más amplia – la naturaleza es una comunidad de sujetos, no una colección de objetos. Esta concepción alternativa del individuo conlleva importantes consecuencias para la filosofía del derecho. Este artículo explora estas consecuencias, primero mediante el análisis de la concepción ecológica del individuo y de la comunidad articulada por el geólogo Thomas Berry (1914-2009). En segundo lugar, este trabajo utiliza el análisis de Berry para desarrollar una teoría ecológica de la jurisprudencia. Esta teoría conecta el derecho humano con la integridad ecológica y sostiene que el derecho humano alcanza (en parte) la calidad jurídica cuando se promulga por el bien común de la comunidad global de la Tierra. A lo largo de este análisis, el informe también pone de relieve las limitaciones de la escritura filosófica y jurídica de Berry y busca el diálogo con la teoría política de izquierdas.
DOWNLOAD THIS PAPER FROM SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2247826
Downloads
Downloads:
PDF 1041
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.