Who cares about the rule of law? Citizens’ rule of law priorities in Hungary and the Czech Republic

Beáta Bakó

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl.2488

Authors

Beáta Bakó Charles University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2488

Keywords:

rule of law, democracy, populism, Hungary, Czech Republic

Abstract

This article presents a representative empirical study where, instead of rating the importance of specific elements of the rule of law, respondents were asked to set up an order of priority between elements of democracy (majority rule) and the rule of law (counter-majoritarian institutions). The survey was conducted both in Hungary and the Czech Republic: these two countries represent the two extremes within the Visegrád Group regarding the rule-of-law-situation, Hungary being the worst and Czechia the best. In Hungary we can observe a deep tension in terms of priorities, and this basically translates into the government-opposition division: pro-government voters prioritise majoritarian arguments, while most opposition voters prefer counter-majoritarian institutions. In Czechia, on the contrary, counter-majoritarian and majoritarian features of the democratic system are seen in a more balanced way: even voters of populist and far-right parties highly appreciate the prevention of power abuse and a functioning constitutional court.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Global Statistics

41 Views	162 Downloads
203 Total

Author Biography

Beáta Bakó, Charles University

Postdoctoral researcher at Charles University, Faculty of Law, Institute for the Interregional Study of Constitutionalism.

References

About Hungary, 2024. Prime Minister Viktor Orbán on the Kossuth Radio programme “Good Morning Hungary”. About Hungary [online], 19 January. Available at: https://abouthungary.hu/speeches-and-remarks/prime-minister-viktor-orban-on-the-kossuth-radio-programme-good-morning-hungary-65afc9434555d

Arato, A., and Cohen, J. L., 2021. Populism and Civil Society: The Challenge to Constitutional Democracy [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197526583.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197526583.001.0001

Bakó, B., 2023. Challenges to EU Values in Hungary. How the European Union Misunderstood the Government of Viktor Orbán [online]. London/New York: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003308126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003308126

Bakó, B., 2024. EU rule-of-law Conditionality and the Uncivic Hungary. Can You Buy the Rule of Law? In: S. P. Ramet and L. Kürti, eds., Civic and Uncivic Values in Hungary. Value Transformation, Politics and Religion. London/New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003488842-7

Bakó, B., 2025. Public demand for the rule of law in Hungary and the Czech Republic [online]. Dataset. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14473/CSDA/HL0XSA

Barnóczki, B., 2025. IDEA: 47 százalék Tisza, 39 százalék Fidesz a biztos szavazók körében. Telex [online], 15 December. Available at: https://telex.hu/belfold/2025/12/15/idea-intezet-partpreferencia-kozvelemeny-kutatas-fidesz-tisza-part-dk-mi-hazank-mkkp

Bellamy, R., 2007. Political constitutionalism. A republican defense of the constitutionality of democracy [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490187

Bellamy, R., 2023. Political constitutionalism and populism. Journal of Law and Society [online], 50(S1), S7-S25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12401

Bíró-Nagy, A., and Szászi, Á., 2024. Az euroszkepticizmus okai Magyarországon [Reasons of Euroscepticism in Hungary). In: A. Bíró-Nagy and G. Medve-Bálint, eds., 20 év az Európai Unióban. Magyarország uniós tagságának közpolitikai mérlege Budapest: Osiris, HUN-REN TK.

Bíró-Nagy, A., Szászi, Á., and Varga, A., 2022. Széttartó világok. Polarizáció a magyar társadalomban a 2022-es választások után [Diverging worlds. Polarisation in the Hungarian society after the elections of 2022] (online). 30 June. Budapest: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Policy Solutions. Available at: https://www.policysolutions.hu/hu/hirek/560/szettarto_vilagok_tanulmany

Blokker, P., 2019. Populist Counter-Constitutionalism, Conservatism, and Legal Fundamentalism. European Constitutional Law Review [online], 15(3), 519-543. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S157401961900035X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S157401961900035X

Blokker, P., 2024. Populism, Human Rights, and (Un-)Civil Society. In: L. Antoniolli and C. Ruzza, eds., The Rule of Law in the EU. Challenges, Actors and Strategies [online]. Cham: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55322-6_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55322-6_5

Bozóki, A., and Hegedüs, D., 2018. Democracy, dictatorship and hybrid regimes: Concepts and approaches. In: F. Bieber, M. Solska and D. Taleski, eds., Illiberal and Authoritarian Tendencies in Central, Southeastern and Eastern Europe. Bern: Peter Lang.

Czarnota, A., 2018. Rule of lawyers or rule of law? On constitutional crisis and rule of law in Poland. In: B. Iancu and E. S. Tănăsescu, eds., Governance and Constitutionalism Law, Politics and Institutional Neutrality [online]. London/New York: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315207216-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315207216-4

Czarnota, A., 2024. Political and Legal Authority in Flux. Populism and Challenges to Liberal Constitutionalism in Central-Eastern Europe. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law [online], 16, 551-567. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-024-00217-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-024-00217-4

Di Gregorio, A., 2019. Constitutional Courts and the Rule of Law in the New EU Member States. Review of Central and East European Law [online], 44, 202-231. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-04402004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-04402004

Gárdos-Orosz, F., 2021. Constitutional Interpretation Under the New Fundamental Law of Hungary. In: F. Gárdos-Orosz and Z. Szente, eds., Populist Challenges to Constitutional Interpretation in Europe and Beyond [online]. London/New York: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003148944 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003148944

Graham, M. H., and Svolik, M. W., 2020. Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States. Americal Political Science Review [online], 114(2), 392-409. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000052

Guasti, P., and Mansfeldova, Z., 2024. Regularity and Instability. Coalition Governments in Czechia 2008–2022. In: T. Bergman, G. Ilonszki and J. Hellström, eds., Coalition Politics in Central Eastern Europe. Governing in Times of Crisis [online]. London/New York: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003328483-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003328483-4

Guasti, P., and Michal, A., 2025. Polarization and Democracy in Central Europe. Politics and Governance [online], 13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.9560 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.9560

Halmai, G., 2021. Does Illiberal Democracy Exist? In: G. Amato, B. Barbisan and C. Pinelli, eds., Rule of law vs majoritarian democracy [online]. Oxford: Hart. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509936878.ch-011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509936878.ch-011

Havlík, V., and Hloušek, V., 2021. Differential Illiberalism: Classifying Illiberal Trends in Central European Party Politics. In: A. Lorenz and L. H. Anders, eds., Illiberal Trends and Anti-EU Politics in East Central Europe [online]. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54674-8_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54674-8_5

Havlík, V., and Kluknavská, A., 2024. The Race of Populists: The 2024 EP Elections in the Czech Republic. In: G. Ivaldi and E. Zankina, eds., 2024 EP Elections under the Shadow of Rising Populism [online]. European Center for Populism Studies, 22 October. Available at: https://doi.org/10.55271/rp0066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55271/rp0066

Hertogh, M., 2024. Empirical Approaches to the Rule of Law. Contours and Challenges of a Social Science That Does Not Quite Yet Exist. Annual Review of Law and Social Science [online], 20, 35-51. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-041822-044308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-041822-044308

Juzgenbayev, A., 2025. Framing the Judiciary: Effects of Partisan, Procedural, and Populist Frames on Apex Court Perceptions in Czechia. Journal of Law and Courts [online], 13(1), 97-121. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2024.17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2024.17

Karsai, D., and Mihály, E., 2020. Elefántsirató – a sikeres alkotmányjogi panaszok utóélete. In: F. Gárdos-Orosz, ed., Normativitás és empíria. A rendes bíróságok és az Alkotmánybíróság kapcsolata az alapjog-érvényesítésben, 2012-2016. Budapest: MTA TK JTI.

Kovář, J., Kratochvíl, P., and Sychra, Z., 2018. Direct Democracy in Czechia: From the Shadows to the Limelight. In: S. Blockmans and S. Russack, eds., Direct Democracy in the EU. The Myth of Citizens’ Union. Brussels: CEPS, 166-188.

Krastev, I., and Holmes, S., 2019. The Light that Failed. A Reckoning. London: Allen Lane.

Kühn, Z., 2021. The Czech Constitutional Court in times of populism. From judicial activism to judicial self-restraint. In: F. Gárdos-Orosz and Z. Szente, eds., Populist Challenges to Constitutional Interpretation in Europe and Beyond [online]. London/New York: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003148944-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003148944-8

Manow, P., 2018. Die politische Ökonomie des Populismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

Manow, P., 2024. Unter Beobachtung. Die Bestimmung der liberalen Demokratie und ihrer Freunde. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

Mudde, C., and Rovira Kaltwasser, C., 2017. Populism. A very short introduction [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001

Rehling Larsen, S., 2021. Varieties of Constitutionalism in the European Union. Modern Law Review, 81, 477-502. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12614

Reuters, 2023. Hungary’s Orban condemns EU federalism, LGBTQ “offensive”. Reuters [online], 22 July. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/hungarys-orban-condemns-eu-federalism-lgbtq-offensive-2023-07-22/

Roberts, K. M., 2022. Populism and Polarization in Comparative Perspective: Constitutive, Spatial and Institutional Dimensions. Government and Opposition [online], 57(4), 680-702. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.14

Sadurski, W., 2016. Transitional Constitutionalism Versus the Rule of Law? Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 16/56 [online]. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2799026

Scheppele, K. L., and Morijn, J., 2024. Money for nothing? EU institutions’ uneven record of freezing EU funds to enforce EU values. Journal of European Public Policy [online], 32(2), 474-497. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2406275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2406275

Schorkopf, F., 2016. Wertesicherung in der Europäischen Union. Prävention, Quarantäne und Aufsicht als Bausteine eines Rechts der Verfassungskrise? Europarecht [online], 51, 147-163. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5771/0531-2485-2016-2-147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0531-2485-2016-2-147

Šipulová, K., 2019. The Czech Constitutional Court. Far Away from Political Influence. In: K. Pócza, ed., Constitutional Politics and the Judiciary Decision-making in Central and Eastern Europe [online]. London/New York: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467097-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467097-3

Šipulová, K., and Králová, A., 2024. The Czech Constitutional Court. The inconspicuous constrainer. In: K. Pócza, ed., Constitutional Review in Central and Eastern Europe. Judicial-Legislative Relations in Comparative Perspective [online]. London/New York: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003399483-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003399483-3

Sólyom, L., 2001. Az Alkotmánybíróság önértelmezése. In: L. Sólyom, Az alkotmánybíráskodás kezdetei Magyarországon. Budapest: Osiris.

Szente, Z., 2013. Az Alkotmánybíróság értelmezési gyakorlata 1990-2010. In: G. Deli and K. Szoboszlay-Kiss, eds., Tanulmányok a 70 éves Bihari Mihály tiszteletére. Universitas, Győr.

Tóth, G. A., 2018. Lost in Transition. Invisible Constitutionalism in Hungary. In: R. Dixon and A. Stone, eds., The Invisible Constitution in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge University Press.

Vermeule, A., 2013. The Constitution of Risk [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338906

Verovšek, P. J., 2020. Caught between 1945 and 1989: collective memory and the rise of illiberal democracy in postcommunist Europe. Journal of European Public Policy [online], 28(6), 840–857. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1768279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1768279

Weiler, J. H. H., 2016. Epilogue: Living in a Glass House. Europe, Democracy and the Rule of Law. In: C. Closa and D. Kochenov, eds., Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316258774.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316258774.017

Weiler, J. H. H., 2020. Orbán and the self-asphyxiation of democracy. International Journal of Constitutional Law [online], 18, 315-318. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa054

Wunsch, N., 2025. Democratic Commitment: Why Citizens Tolerate Democratic Backsliding [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198902768.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198902768.001.0001

Zakaria, F., 2007. The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad. New York: W. W. Norton.

Zürn, M., 2022. How Non-Majoritarian Institutions Make Silent Majorities Vocal: A Political Explanation of Authoritarian Populism. Perspectives on Politics [online], 20, 788-807. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721001043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721001043