The right to be forgotten concerning the criminal past: Developments in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights with particular reference to the anonymisation of digital press archives

Mikel Anderez Belategi

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl.1938

Authors

Mikel Anderez Belategi University of the Basque Country https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3591-3240

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1938

Keywords:

Right to be forgotten, European Court of Human Rights, Hurbain v. Belgium, Reintegration

Abstract

Do offenders have a right “to be forgotten”? What is the content of this right, and against whom can it be exercised? These questions have become more pressing with the irruption of new information and communication technologies, which entail a new risk of perpetuating a virtual criminal record. The growing role of the digital archives of the press has led some jurisdictions to adopt different measures to anonymise or de-reference personal data. The Strasbourg Court, historically reluctant to accept any interference with the initial publication of personal data concerning convicted offenders, has recently dealt with the compatibility of different measures involving the anonymisation or de-indexing of news articles in the digital archives. This contribution describes these recent legal developments, focusing on the criteria developed by Strasbourg to assess the legitimacy of anonymisation measures adopted by States in response to right-to-be-forgotten requests against the media.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Views 281
Downloads:
14(6)_Anderez_OSLS 99
XML_ 14(6)_Anderez_OSLS 16

Author Biography

Mikel Anderez Belategi, University of the Basque Country

Department of Public Law (Criminal Law)
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)

References

Alonso Rimo, A., 2015. La publicidad de los antecedentes penales como estrategia de prevención del delito (a propósito de los registros públicos de maltratadores y de delincuentes sexuales). In: E. Orts Berenguer, A. Alonso Rimo and M. Roig Torres, eds., Derecho penal de la peligrosidad y prevención de la reincidencia. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 559–594.

Antani, R., 2015. The Resistance of Memory: Could the European Union’s Right to Be Forgotten exist in the United States? Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 30(4), 1178.

Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, 2014. Guidelines on the implementation of the Court of Justice of the European Union judgment on ‘Google Spain and Inc v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González C-131/12, adopted on 26th November 2014 (WP 225, 14/EN) [online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/items/667236/en

Corda, A., and Lageson, S.E., 2019. Disordered Punishment: Workaround Technologies of Criminal Records Disclosure and the Rise of a new Penal Entrepreneurialism. British Journal of Criminology [online], 60(2) 245–264. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz039

De la Durantaye, K., 2023. Shaping the Right to Privacy. The Interplay between Karlsruhe, Strasbourg, and Luxembourg. In: M. Fornasier and M.G. Stanzione, eds., The European Convention on Human Rights and its Implications on National Private Law [online]. Cambridge: Intersentia, 119–136. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781839703898.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781839703898.008

Frosio, G.F., 2017. Right to Be Forgotten: Much Ado About Nothing. Colorado Technology Law Journal [online], 15(2), 307–336. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/f7cqj DOI: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/f7cqj

Gumzej, N., 2023. Technical Solutions Supporting the Online RTBF in the CJEU and ECHR Jurisprudence. MIPRO 2023 46th ICT and Electronics Convention [online], 1672–1678. Available at: https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO57284.2023.10159696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO57284.2023.10159696

Jacobs, J.B., 2015. The Eternal Criminal Record [online]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674735842 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674735842

Jacobs, J.B., and Larrauri, E., 2015. European Criminal Records and Ex-Offender Employment. In: Oxford Handbooks Editorial Board, ed., Oxford Handbook Topics in Criminology and Criminal Justice [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935383.013.157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935383.013.157

King, G., 2014. EU ‘Right to be Forgotten’ Ruling Will Corrupt History. Committee to Protect Journalists Blog [online]. Available at: https://cpj.org/2014/06/eu-right-to-be-forgotten-ruling-will-corrupt-histo/

Kulk, S., and Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., 2014. Google Spain v. González: Did the Court Forget About Freedom of Expression?. European Journal of Risk Regulation [online], 5(3), 389–398. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00003949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00003949

Lageson, S.E., 2020. Digital Punishment. Privacy, Stigma, and the Harms of Data-Driven Criminal Justice [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190872007.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190872007.001.0001

Lucas Murillo de la Cueva, P., 2023. El derecho al olvido digital y su actualidad. In: P. Simón Castellano, ed., Evolución e interpretación del TC sobre derechos fundamentales y garantías procesales: cuestiones recientemente controvertidas. Cizur Menor: Aranzadi, 71–85.

Monti, A., 2021. The European Court of Human Rights and the right to erase history. Inforrm’s Blog [online], 9 December. Available at: https://inforrm.org/2021/12/09/the-european-court-of-human-rights-and-the-right-to-erase-history-andrea-monti/#more-50820

Ní Chinnéide, H., 2023. Hurbain v Belgium: Navigating the Intersection of Privacy and Press Freedom in the Digital Age. Strasbourg Observers [online], 3 October. Available at: https://strasbourgobservers.com/2023/10/03/hurbain-v-belgium-navigating-the-intersection-of-privacy-and-press-freedom-in-the-digital-age/

NY Times Editorial Board, 2015. Europe’s expanding ‘Right to be Forgotten’. NY Times [online], 4 February. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/04/opinion/europes-expanding-right-to-be-forgotten.html.

Raynor, P., and Robinson, G., 2005. Rehabilitation, Crime and Justice [online]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230273986 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230273986

Rosen, J., 2012. The Right to Be Forgotten. Stanford Law Review Online [online], 64(88), 88–92. Available at: https://review.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2012/02/64-SLRO-88.pdf

Rotman, E., 1990. Beyond punishment: a new view on the rehabilitation of criminal offenders. New York/Westport: Greenwood Press.

Van der Kerkof, J., 2022. Biancardi v. Italy: a broader right to be forgotten. Strasbourg Observers [online], 7 January. Available at: https://strasbourgobservers.com/2022/01/07/biancardi-v-italy-a-broader-right-to-be-forgotten/

Van Zyl Smit, D., and Snacken, S., 2009. Principles of European prison law and policy: penology and human rights. Oxford University Press.