On judges when the rule of law is under attack
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1929Keywords:
judges, rule of law, backslidingAbstract
A main question of the paper is why the courts, and the judiciary are such a main focus of those in power who attack liberal democracy today. First it adresses the connections between democratic decline and rule of law backsliding. Then it adresses some historical perspectives and compare the present situation to autocracies and totalitarian experiences in Europe in the twentieth century. Finally, it discusses different measures taken by autocratic rulers to limit judicial control, how to distinguish such measures from measures of legitimate legal reform, and how to counter such measures.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
First_Online_Graver_OSLS 58
References
Alston, P., 2013. Does the Past Matter? Harvard Law Review [online], vol. 126, 2043–81. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23415065
Bell, J., 2006. Introduction. In: J. Bell, Judiciaries within Europe: A Comparative Review. Cambridge University Press, 1–43.
Bell, J., 2013. Path Dependence and Legal Development. Tulane Law Review [online], 87(4), 787–810. Available at: https://www.tulanelawreview.org/pub/volume87/issue4/path-dependence-and-legal-development
Bencze, M., 2021. Judicial Populism and the Weberian Judge—The Strength of Judicial Resistance Against Governmental Influence in Hungary. German Law Journal [online], 22(7), 1282–1297. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.67 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.67
Bermeo, N., 2016. On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy [online], 27(1), 5–19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012
Boese, V.A., et al., 2022. Autocratization Changing Nature? Democracy Report 2022 [online]. University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute (V-Dem). Available at: https://www.v-dem.net/documents/19/dr_2022_ipyOpLP.pdf
Bogdandy, A., and Sonnevend, P., eds., 2015. Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area. Theory, Law and Politics in Hungary and Romania. Baden Baden: Nomos. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474202176
Bojarski, L., 2023. Judicial Resistance against the Rule of Law Backsliding —Judges and Citizens—the case of Poland [online]. PhD Thesis, University of Oslo. Available at: https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/105831/PhD-Bojarski-2023.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Bourdieu, P., 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
Bourdieu, P., 1990. The Logic of Practice. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621749
Brownlee, J., and Miao, K., 2022. Debate: Why Democracies Survive. Journal of Democracy [online], 33(4), 133–49. Available at: https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/debate-why-democracies-survive/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2022.0052
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2020 Rule of Law Report The rule of law situation in the European Union (COM(2020) 580 final) [online]. Brussels, 30 September. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0580
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 2022 Rule of Law Report (COM(2022) 55 final) [online]. Luxembourg, 13 July. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1658828718680&uri=CELEX%3A52022DC0500
Corrales, J., 2015. The Authoritarian Resurgence: Autocratic Legalism in Venezuela. Journal of Democracy [online], 26(2), 37–51. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0031
Čuroš, P., 2021. Panopticon of the Slovak Judiciary – Continuity of Power Centers and Mental Dependence. German Law Journal [online], 22(7), 1247–1281. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.62
Čuroš, P., 2023. Attack or Reform – Systemic Interventions in the Judiciary in Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 13(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1393
Čuroš, P., and Graver, H.P., 2020. Dissimilar Similarities: Structural Reforms of the Courts in Norway and Slovakia. VerfBlog [online], 26 November. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20201126-123123-0
Danilet, C., 2020. Justice versus Politics: from Inability to Independence in 900 Days of Uninterrupted Siege Upon the Romanian Magistracy: A Survival Guide [online]. Bucharest: C.H. Beck. Available at: https://www.kas.de/documents/280457/0/900_days_EN_20201202.pdf/2d07e665-a8e3-b003-55c8-a0bae8b4ff6c?version=1.0&t=1609841294482
Deflem, M., 2008. Sociology of law: visions of a scholarly tradition. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815546
Fleck, Z., 2021. Changes of the Political and Legal Systems: Judicial Autonomy. German Law Journal [online], 22, 1298–1315. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.64 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.64
Follesdal, A., 2020. Survey Article: The Legitimacy of International Courts. Journal of Political Philosophy [online], 28(4), 476–99. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12213
Graver, H.P., 2015. Judges Against Justice, On Judges When the Rule of Law is Under Attack. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Graver, H.P., 2016. Judges Against Justice, on Judges when the Rule of Law is under Attack. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44293-7
Graver, H.P., 2018. Judicial Independence Under Authoritarian Rule: An Institutional Approach to the Legal Tradition of the West. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 10, 317–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0071-8
Graver, H.P., 2019. Law and the Russian Revolution: A Comparison with the Nazi Approach to Law. In: A. Pozdnakocva, ed., Russian Revolutions of 1917 Scandinavian Perspectives. London: Wildi, Simmonds & Hill.
Gutmann, J., and Voigt, S., 2020. Judicial independence in the EU: a puzzle. European Journal of Law and Economics [online], 49, 83–100. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-018-9577-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-018-9577-8
Gyöngyi, P., 2020. Hungary - Protecting the Liberal Constitution. In: S. Hardt, A.W. Heringa and H.T. Nguyen, eds., Populism and Democracy. Hong Kong/Taiwan: Eleven International, 213–238.
Gyöngyi, P.M., 2019. Judicial Reforms in Hungary and Romania the Challenging Implementation of EU Rule of Law Standards [online]. 12 December. Thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Available at: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/124331/Dissertation-PM-Gyongyi_final.pdf
Gyöngyi, P., 2020. The Obligation of Judges to Uphold Rules of Positive Law and Possibly Conflicting Ethical Values in Context. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy [online], 2, 196–217. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5553/NJLP/221307132020049002005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/NJLP/221307132020049002005
Herre, B., 2022. The world has recently become less democratic. OurWorldInData.org [online]. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/less-democratic
Huneeus, A.V., and Madsen, M., 2018. Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics. A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(1), 136–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy011
Huq, A., and Ginsburg, T., 2018. How to Lose a Constitutional Democracy. UCLA Law Review [online], 65(1), 78–169. Available at: https://www.uclalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Huq-Ginsburg-65-1.pdf
Kirchheimer, O., 1961. Political Justice. Princeton University Press.
Knutsen, C.H., et al., 2024. Conceptual and Measurement Issues in Assessing Democratic Backsliding. PS: Political Science & Politics [online], 57(2), 162–177. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909652300077X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909652300077X
Kosař, D., 2016. Perils of Judicial Self-Government in Transitional Societies [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316282519 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316282519
Kosař, D., Baroš, J., and Dufek, P., 2019. The Twin Challenges to Separation of Powers in Central Europe. Technocratic Governance and Populism [online]. European Constitutional Law Review 15(3), 427. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019619000336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019619000336
Kühn, Z., 2021. The Judiciary in Illiberal States. German Law Journal [online], 22(7), 1231–1246. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.71
Laffranque, J., 2014. Judicial Independence in Europe: Principles and Reality. In: N.A. Engstad, A. Lærdal Frøseth and B. Tønder, eds., The Independence of Judges. The Hague: Eleven International, 127–148.
Lagoutte, S., Sano, H.O., and Smith, P.S., 2007. Human Rights in Turmoil. Facing threats, consolidating achievements. Huneeus: Martinus Nijhoff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004154322.i-299
Lohne, K., 2019. Advocates of Humanity. Human Rights NGOs in International Criminal Justice. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198818748.001.0001
Markovits, I., 2007. The Death of Socialist Law? Annual Review of Law and Social Science [online], 3(1), 233–253. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112849
Meierhenrich, J., 2018. The Remnants of the Rechtsstaat: An Ethnography of Nazi Law. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814412.003.0006
Moliterno, J., and Čuroš, P., 2021. Recent Attacks on Judicial Independence: The Vulgar, the Systemic, and the Insidious. German Law Journal [online], 22(7), 1159–1191. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.63 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.63
Nord, M., et al., 2024. Democracy Report 2024: Democracy Winning and Losing at the Ballot [online]. University of Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute. Available at: https://www.v-dem.net/documents/43/v-dem_dr2024_lowres.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4774409
Pech, L., 2022. The Rule of Law as a Well-Established and Well-Defined Principle of EU Law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law [online], vol. 14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00176-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00176-8
Pech, L., and Scheppele, K., 2017. Illiberalism Within: Rule of Law Backsliding in the EU. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies [online], 19, 3–47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2017.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2017.9
Pech, L., Wachowiec, P., and Mazur, D., 2021. Poland’s Rule of Law Breakdown: A Five-Year Assessment of EU’s (In)Action. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law [online], 13, 1–43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-021-00151-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-021-00151-9
Rovira Kaltwasser, C., et al., eds., 2017. The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001
Sadurski, W., 2019. Polish Constitutional Tribunal Under PiS: From an Activist Court, to a Paralysed Tribunal, to a Governmental Enabler. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law [online], 11(1), 63–84. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40803-018-0078-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0078-1
Sajó, A., 2022. Ruling by Cheating Governance in Illiberal Democracy. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108952996
Sanchez-Urribarri, R., 2011. Courts between Democracy and Hybrid Authoritarianism: Evidence from the Venezuelan Supreme Court. Law & Social Inquiry [online], 36(4), 854–884. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2011.01253.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2011.01253.x
Scheppele, K.L., Kochenov, D., and Grabowska Moroz, B., 2020. EU values are Law, after All: Enforcing EU Values through Systemic Infringement Actions by the European Commission and the Member States of the European Union. Yearbook of European Law [online], vol. 39. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yeaa012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3706496
Sibert-Fohr, A., 2012. Judicial Independence in Transition. In: A. Sibert-Fohr, ed., Judicial Independence in Transition. Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media, 1279–1360, 1306–1311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28299-7_29
Sida, L., and Halliday, T.C., 2016. Criminal Defense in China: The Politics of Lawyers at Work [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316677230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316677230
Smith, E., 1995. The Legitimacy of Judicial Review of Legislation – a Comparative Approach. In: E. Smith, ed., Constitutional Justice under Old Constitutions [online]. The Hague: Kluwer, 363–402.
Stiansen, Ø., and Voeten, E., 2020. Backlash and Judicial Restraint: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights. International Studies Quarterly [online], 64(4), 770–784. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa047
Szente, Z., 2021. Stepping Into the Same River Twice? Judicial Independence in Old and New Authoritarianism. German Law Journal [online], 22(7), 1316–1326. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.69
Vallinder, T., 1994. The Judicialization of Politics. A World-Wide Phenomenon: Introduction. International Political Science Review / Revue Internationale de Science Politique [online], 15(2), 91–99. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1601557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019251219401500201
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hans Petter Graver
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
