Counter-hegemonic uses of law in struggles for freedom of movement in the Central Mediterranean
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1921Keywords:
Search and Rescue, migration, Central Mediterranean, hegemony, litigation, postcolonial justiceAbstract
Law constitutes the architecture of the governance of global mobility. It regulates the irreducible impulse to move, binding people to territories through the institution of citizenship and limiting the possibilities of crossing international borders. Law can also be mobilised to secure the rights of people on the move. In the Mediterranean various actors interact across a densely entangled legal landscape involving the Law of the sea, fundamental rights and asylum, and public law rules granting control and repressive powers to states for border protection and crime prevention. This article asks if — and under which conditions — law can take on counter-hegemonic qualities in the struggles for freedom of movement. It argues that legal interventions that support migrants on the move can be counter-hegemonic if they combine different approaches regarding the legal responsibility of states and when they support migratory claims to enter European territory without focusing only on the issue of international protection.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
14(4)_Santer_Gennari_OSLS 58
XML_14(4)_Santer_Gennari_OSLS 0
References
Achiume, T.E., 2019. Migration as Decolonization. Stanford Law Review [online], 71(6), 1509–1574. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3330353
Affolter, L., 2022. Trained to Disbelieve: The Normalisation of Suspicion in a Swiss Asylum Administration Office. Geopolitics [online], 27(4), 1069–1092. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1897577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1897577
Amighetti, S., and Nuti, A., 2016. A Nation’s Right to Exclude and the Colonies. Political Theory [online], 44(4), 541–566. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591715589764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591715589764
Anghie, A., 2004. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614262
Arendt, H., 1951. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Atak, I., and Crépeau, F., 2021. Refugees as Migrants. In: C. Costello, M. Foster and J. McAdam, eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law [online]. Oxford University Press, 134–151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0008
Benhabib, S., and Nathwani, N., 2021. The Ethics of International Refugee Protection. In: C. Costello, M. Foster and J. McAdam, eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law [online]. Oxford University Press, 114–133. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0007
Bhambra, G.K., 2015. Europe won’t resolve the “migrant crisis” until it faces its own past. The Conversation [online], 1 September. Available at: https://theconversation.com/europe-wont-resolve-the-migrant-crisis-until-it-faces-its-own-past-46555
Buckel, S., and Fischer-Lescano, A., 2009. Gramsci Reconsidered: Hegemony in Global Law. Leiden Journal of International Law [online], 22(3), 437–454. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156509990033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156509990033
Buonamano, R., 1998. The Economy of Violence: Derrida on Law and Justice. Ratio Juris [online], 11(2), 168–179. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00083
Cancellaro, F., 2020. Dagli hotspot ai “porti chiusi”: quali rimedi per la libertà “sequestrata” alla frontiera? Diritto penale contemporaneo - Rivista trimestrale [online], n. 3. Available at: https://www.sistemapenale.it/it/articolo/cancellaro-hotspot-porti-chiusi-liberta-personale-rimedi
Carrera, S., and Cortinovis, R., 2019. Search and rescue, disembarkation and relocation arrangements in the Mediterranean: Sailing Away from Responsibility? CEPS Paper in Liberty and Security in Europe [online], 2019–10. Available at: https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/search-and-rescue-disembarkation-and-relocation-arrangements-in-the-mediterranean/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203275-10
Cover, R.M., 1983. Foreword: Nomos and Narrative. Harvard Law Review [online], 97(1), 4–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340787 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1340787
Danewid, I., 2017. White innocence in the Black Mediterranean: hospitality and the erasure of history. Third World Quarterly [online], 38(7), 1674–1689. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1331123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1331123
Dann, P., and Eckert, J., 2020. Norm-creation beyond the state. In: M.C. Foblets et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Law and Anthropology [online]. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 808–826. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198840534.013.47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198840534.013.47
De Vittor, F., 2023. La migrazione via mare nel diritto internazionale: libertà di movimento, obblighi di soccorso e rispetto dei diritti umani delle persone migranti. Naples: Editorial Scientifica.
Derrida, J., 1992. Force of Law: The “Mystical Foundation of Authority”. In: D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld and D. Gray Carlson, eds., Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York/London: Routledge.
Douzinas, C., 2000. The End of Human Rights: Critical Legal Thought at the Turn of the Century [online]. Oxford: Hart. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509955527 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509955527
Eckert, J., 2023. Decolonising the political: Presence, Law, and Obligation. Anthropological Theory [online], 23(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14634996231185324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14634996231185324
El-Enany, N., 2008. Who is the new European refugee? European Law Review [online], 33(3), 313–335. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1033334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1033334
Fassin, D., 2005. Compassion and Repression: The Moral Economy of Immigration Policies in France. Cultural Anthropology [online], 20(3), 362–387. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2005.20.3.362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2005.20.3.362
Gil-Bazo, M.T., and Guild, E., 2021. The Right to Asylum. In: C. Costello, M. Foster, and J. McAdam, eds. The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law [online]. Oxford University Press, 867–882. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0049
il Fatto Quotidiano, 2019. Sea Watch, la Corte europea dei Diritti dell’uomo: “Sì assistenza dei migranti a bordo, no alla richiesta di sbarco”. Il Fatto Quotidiano [online], 29 January. Available at: https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2019/01/29/sea-watch-la-corte-europea-dei-diritti-delluomo-si-assistenza-a-bordo-no-alla-richiesta-di-sbarco/4933936/
Kennedy, D., 1973. Legal formality. The journal of legal studies [online], 2(2), 351–398. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/467502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/467502
Kennedy, D., 2002. The critique of rights in critical legal studies. Left legalism/left critique [online], 178, 216–227. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822383871-006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11hpn4c.9
Kukathas, C., 2016. Are Refugees Special? In: S. Fine and L. Ypi, eds., Migration in Political Theory [online]. Oxford University Press, 249–268. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676606.003.0012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676606.003.0012
Lorde, A., 1984. Sister Outsider. Toronto: The Crossing Press.
Mann, I., 2020. The Right to Perform Rescue at Sea: Jurisprudence and Drowning. German Law Journal [online], 21(special issue 3), 598–619. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.30
McAdam, J., 2021. Displacement in the Context of Climate Change and Disasters. In: C. Costello, M. Foster and J. McAdam, eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law [online]. Oxford University Press, 832–847. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0047
McLoughlin, D., 2016. Post-Marxism and the Politics of Human Rights: Lefort, Badiou, Agamben, Rancière. Law and Critique [online], 27(3), 303–321. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-016-9177-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-016-9177-0
Moreno-Lax, V., and Giuffré, M., 2017. The Rise of Consensual Containment: From “Contactless Control” to “Contactless Responsibility” for Forced Migration Flows. In: S.S. Juss, ed., Research Handbook on International Refugee Law. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar, 82–108.
Morris, R.C., 2007. Legacies of Derrida: Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology [online], 36, 355–389. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094357
Rajagopal, B., 1998. Locating the Third World in Cultural Geography. Third World Legal Studies [online], 15(1), 1–20. Available at: http://scholar.valpo.edu/twls/vol15/iss1/2
Rancière, J., 2004. Who Is the Subject of the Rights of Man? The South Atlantic Quarterly [online], 103(2), 297–310. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-103-2-3-297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-103-2-3-297
Rancière, J., 2010. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics [online]. London: Bloomsbury. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472547378.ch-001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472547378.ch-001
Rothberg, M., 2019. The Implicated Subject: Beyond Victims and Perpetrators [online]. Stanford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609600
Sanfilippo, A., 2021. La corte EDU adotta misure provvisorie contro Polonia e Lettonia. IARI [online], 5 October. https://iari.site/2021/10/05/la-corte-edu-adotta-misure-provvisorie-contro-polonia-e-lettonia/
Santos, B. S., 2020. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization, and Emancipation, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662427
Santos, B.S., 2005. The counter-hegemonic use of law in the struggle for a globalization from below. Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez, 39, 421–474.
Shachar, A., and Hirschl, R., 2007. Citizenship as Inherited Property. Political Theory [online], 35(3), 253–287. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591707299808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591707299808
Sharma, N., 2020. Home Rule: National Sovereignty and the Separation of Natives and Migrants [online]. Durham: Duke University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478002451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478002451
Trevisanut, S., 2014. Is there a right to be rescued at sea? A constructive view. Questions of International Law [online], 1, 3–15. Available at: https://www.qil-qdi.org/is-there-a-right-to-be-rescued-at-sea-a-constructive-view/
Trubek, D.M., 1984. Where the Action Is: Critical Legal Studies and Empiricism. Stanford Law Review [online], 36(1/2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1228692 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1228692
Young, I.M., 2006. Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model. Social Philosophy and Policy [online], 23(01), 102. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052506060043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052506060043
Zirulia, S., and Cancellaro, F., 2019. Caso Sea Watch: cosa ha detto e cosa non ha detto la Corte di Strasburgo nella decisione sulle misure provvisorie. Diritto Penale Contemporaneo [online], 26 June. Available at: https://archiviodpc.dirittopenaleuomo.org/d/6760-cosa-ha-detto-e-cosa-non-ha-detto-la-corte-di-strasburgo-sul-caso-sea-watch
Zumbansen, P., 2010. Transnational legal pluralism. Transnational Legal Theory [online], 1(2), 141–189. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2010.11424506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2010.11424506
Zumbansen, P., 2019. Transnational Law as Socio-Legal Theory and Critique: Prospects for “Law and Society” in a Divided World. Buffalo Law Review [online], 67(3), 909–960. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol67/iss3/
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dr. des. Kiri Olivia Santer, Lucia Gennari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
