Decentralised finance, regulation, and systems theory

John Paterson

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl.1916

Authors

John Paterson University of Aberdeen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1916

Keywords:

Cryptocurrency, central bank digital currencies, internal differentiation, dedifferentiation

Abstract

Cryptocurrency has sparked expressions of concern from regulators – though sometimes coupled with expressions of interest in state-backed alternatives. This paradoxical situation neatly encapsulates the conundrum confronting regulators as they seek to come to terms with the new world opened up by blockchain and leading ultimately perhaps to decentralised finance. How do we best understand this confusing situation? This paper looks for answers by attempting to conceptualise the phenomenon of decentralised finance in autopoietic systems terms. Insofar as a plausible argument can be made for the proposition that finance represents an example of the internal differentiation of the economy, does decentralised finance in some sense constitute an intensified internal differentiation? Alternatively, and paradoxically, insofar as what we are concerned with is decentralised finance, does it instead in some sense represent an example of dedifferentiation? Answers to these questions will have relevance for efforts to regulate this emerging phenomenon. They will also help to shed light on whether state and central bank experiments in this space will produce positive effects or bring their own challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Views 219
Downloads:
14(5)_Paterson_OSLS 294
XML_14(5)_Paterson_OSLS 4

Author Biography

John Paterson, University of Aberdeen

John Paterson is Professor of Law at the University of Aberdeen and a founder member of its Centre for Energy Law. He has worked on a range of international research, teaching, training, and consultancy projects in energy law and has published widely on a range of topics in the field. He has also published in the field of corporate governance and delivered specialist training on this topic. He has also published in the field of systems theory, with a particular focus on its empirical possibilities. He was recently a visiting professor at the National University of Singapore. He coordinates Aberdeen’s contribution to the Advanced Master’s in Energy Law under the North Sea Energy Law Partnership (with the Universities of Copenhagen, Groningen and Oslo).

References

Banco Central do Brasil (BCB), 2023. BCB updates the guidelines of the Digital Brazilian Real and releases the directives of its pilot project [online]. Press release, 17 March. Available at: https://www.bcb.gov.br/en/pressdetail/2466/nota

Brainard, L., 2022. Crypto-Assets and Decentralized Finance through a Financial Stability Lens [online]. Bank of England Conference, London, 8 July. Available at: https://fedinprint.org/item/fedgsq/94445

concerned.tech 2022. Letter in support of responsible fintech policy [online]. 1 June. Available at: https://concerned.tech/

Criddle, C., and Oliver, J., 2022, How Ukraine embraced cryptocurrencies in response to war. Financial Times [online], 19 March. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/f3778d00-4c9b-40bb-b91c-84b60dd09698

Indian Ministry of Finance, 2023. Answer to question on the legalisation of crypto currency [online], 3 April. Available at: https://sansad.in/getFile/annex/259/AU3104.pdf?source=pqars

Karandikar, N., Chakravorty, A., and Rong, C., 2021. Blockchain Based Transaction System with Fungible and Non-Fungible Tokens for a Community-Based Energy Infrastructure. Sensors [online], 21(11), 3822. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21113822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21113822

Kasriel, S., 2022, Where the Metaverse can take FinTech. Medium, 11 May.

Kim, A., Trimborn, S., and Härdle, W.K., 2021, VCRIX — A volatility index for crypto-currencies. International Review of Financial Analysis [online], vol. 78, 2021, 101915, 9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101915

King, M., and Thornhill, C., 2003. Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Politics and Law. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503588

Kotey, S.D., et al., 2023, Blockchain interoperability: the state of heterogenous blockchain-to-blockchain communication. IET Communications [online], 17(8), 891–914. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1049/cmu2.12594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/cmu2.12594

Luhmann, N., 1987. Closure and Openness: On Reality in the World of Law. In: G Teubner, ed., Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: de Gruyter, 335-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110876451.335

Luhmann, N., 1996. Social Systems. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.

Luhmann, N., 1998. Limits of Steering. Theory, Culture and Society, 14(1), 41-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026327697014001003

Luhmann, N., 2004. Law as a Social System. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198262381.001.0001

Nakamoto, S., 2008. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system [online]. White Paper. Available at: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), 2016. Unified Payments Interface (UPI) Product Overview [online]. Available at: https://www.npci.org.in/what-we-do/upi/product-overview

Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI), Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Bank of England, 2022. Joint statement from UK Financial Regulation Authorities on Sanctions and the Cryptoasset Sector [online]. 11 March. Available at: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2022/march/joint-statement-from-uk-financial-regulation-authorities-on-sanctions-and-the-cryptoasset-sector

Paterson, J., 2013, Financial Instruments, Functional Differentiation and Regulatory Challenges. In: A. Febbrajo and G. Harste, eds., Law and Intersystemic Communication: Understanding Structural Couplings. Aldershot: Ashgate, 155-177.

Paterson, J., and Teubner, G., 1998. Changing Maps: Empirical Legal Autopoiesis. Social and Legal Studies [online], 7(4), 451-486. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/096466399800700401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/096466399800700401

People’s Bank of China (PBC), 2021a. Notice on Further Preventing and Disposing of the Risk of Virtual Currency Transaction Speculation [online]. 24 September. Available at: http://www.pbc.gov.cn/goutongjiaoliu/113456/113469/4348556/index.html

People’s Bank of China (PBC), 2021b. Progress of Research and Development of E-CNY in China [online]. Working Paper, July. Available at: http://www.pbc.gov.cn/en/3688110/3688172/4157443/4293696/2021071614584691871.pdf

Schinckus, C., Nguyen, C.P., and Ling, F.C.H, 2020. Crypto-currencies Trading and Energy Consumption. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy [online], 10(3), 355-364. Available at: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/9258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.9258

Smith, S., 2020. Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence and Financial Services: Implications and Applications for Finance and Accounting Professionals. Cham: Springer.

Sonvilla-Weiss, S., 2009. (In)visible: Learning to Act in the Metaverse. Vienna: Springer.

Spencer Brown, G., 1972. Laws of Form. New York: The Julian Press.

Teubner, G., 1983. Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law. Law and Society Review [online], 17(2), 239-85. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053348

Teubner, G., 1985. After Legal Instrumentalism: Strategic Models of Post-Regulatory Law. In: G Teubner, ed., Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110921526

Teubner, G., 1992. Regulatory Law: Chronicle of a Death Foretold. Social and Legal Studies [online], 1, 451-475. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/096466399200100401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/096466399200100401

Teubner, G., 2000. Contracting Worlds: The Many Autonomies of Private Law. Social and Legal Studies [online], 9(3), 399-417. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/096466390000900305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/096466390000900305

Teubner, G., 2007. In the Blind Spot: The Hybridization of Contracting. Theoretical Inquiries in Law [online], 8(1), 51-71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2202/1565-3404.1143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1565-3404.1143

Unsworth, R., 2019. Smart Contract This! An Assessment of the Contractual Landscape and the Herculean Challenges it Currently Presents for “Self-executing” Contracts. In: M. Corrales, M. Fenwick and H. Haapio, eds., Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain. Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation [online]. Singapore: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6086-2_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6086-2_2

Vogel, E.F., 2011. Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674062832

Wilson, C., 2022. Blockchain and Sustainability. Company Secretary’s Review, 45(12), 186-188.