Redrafting imperfect legislation: Structural judgments and judicial supervision of administrative enforcement in Latin America

Cristián Villalonga

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/1909

Authors

Cristián Villalonga Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5018-861X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/1909

Keywords:

Imperfect legislation, Socioeconomic Rights, Structural Judgments, Judicial Monitoring, Latin American Public Law

Abstract

Structural judgments regarding socioeconomic rights and the judicial oversight of their enforcement are two phenomena that have recently characterized Latin American public law. This paper examines how these phenomena of judicial behaviour respond to certain deficiencies in legislation (e.g., incomplete law and legislative stalemate). Suboptimal legislation usually indicates that political actors cannot impose their preferences or reach satisfactory agreements due to high transaction costs, thus presenting an opportunity for judicial intervention. However, the same suboptimal legislation can also expose a degree of political reluctance or lack of state institutional capacity to implement appropriate policies. Without aiming to establish a comprehensive theory, this paper explores how structural judgments and the creation of judicial monitoring systems deal with these different aspects of imperfect legislation. The paper briefly provides an analytical framework and takes a new approach to examining three well-known case studies from Colombia, Argentina, and Peru.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Views 151
Downloads:
14(6)_Villalonga_OSLS 124
XML_14(6)_Villalonga_OSLS 5

Author Biography

Cristián Villalonga, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Associate Professor. Facultad de Derecho. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Alameda 340, Santiago, Región Metropolitana. Zip Code 8331150. Email: cvillalt@uc.cl

References

Agudelo, C., et al., 2011. Sistema de salud colombiano: 20 años de logros y problemas. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva [online], 16(6). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000600020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000600020

Allen, D.W., 1991. What Are Transaction Costs? Research in Law and Economics [online], 14, 1–18. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3882114

Barbieri, G., 2006. El activismo judicial tuvo que enfrentar, una vez más, a la disfuncionalidad administrativa. La Ley, E 316. (2734/2006).

Barrera, L., 2012. La Corte Suprema en escena. Una etnografía del mundo judicial. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.

Barriga, M.L., 2017. Estado de cosas inconstitucional. Análisis y balance de la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional. In: J.M. Sosa Sacio, ed., Igualdad, Derechos Sociales y Control de Políticas Públicas en la Jurisprudencia Constitucional. Lima: Palestra, 243–256.

Barroso, L.R., 2016. Reason Without Vote: The Representative and Majoritarian Function of Constitutional Courts. In: T. Bustamante and B. Gonçalves Fernandes, eds., Democratizing Constitutional Law: Perspectives on Legal Theory and Legitimacy of Constitutionalism [online]. Cham: Springer, 71–92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28371-5_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28371-5_4

Bergallo, P., 2011. Argentina: Courts and the Right to Health: Achieving Fairness Despite Routinization in Individual Coverage Cases. In: A.E. Yamin and S. Gloppen, eds., Can Courts Bring More Justice to Health? [online]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 43-75. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjz81hc.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjz81hc.6

Binder, S.A., 2003. Stalemate. Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Bravo Alarcón, F., 2015. El Pacto Faustico de La Oroya. El derecho a la contaminación beneficiosa [online]. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Available at: http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/54088

Brinks, D., 2017. Solving the Problem of (Non)compliance in Social and Economic Rights Litigation. In: M. Langford, C. Rodríguez-Garavito and J. Rossi, eds., Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance [online]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 140–76. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316673058.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316673058.015

Brinks, D., and Forbath, W., 2014. The Role of Law and Constitutions in the New Politics of Welfare in Latin America. In: R. Peerenboom and T. Ginsburg, eds., Law and Development of Middle-Income Countries. Avoiding the Middle-Income Trap [online]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 231–244. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235730.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235730.015

Brinks, D., Levitsky, S., and Murillo, M.V., 2020. The Political Origins of Institutional Weakness. In: D. Brinks, S. Levitsky and M.V. Murillo, eds., The Politics of Institutional Weakness in Latin America [online]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1–40. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108776608.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108776608.001

Cafferatta, N., 2004. Introducción al Derecho Ambiental. Buenos Aires: Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y los Recursos Naturales.

Cafferatta, N., 2013. Caso Mendoza (De la contaminación del Río Matanza Riachuelo). Doctrina de la Corte Suprema de Justicia en Procesos Colectivos Ambientales. En: J.C. Cassagne, ed., Corte Suprema de la Nación. Máximos Precedentes. Derecho Administrtativo. Tomo II. Buenos Aires: La Ley, 382–410.

Cardona, Á., et al., 2005. Temas críticos en la reforma de la Ley de seguridad social de Colombia en el capítulo de salud. Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública [online], 23(1), 117–33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.541

Casper, J.D., 1976. The Supreme Court and National Policy Making. The American Political Science Review [online], 70(1), 50–63. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1960323 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1960323

Cederstav, A., and Barandiarán, A., 2002. La Oroya no espera. Lima: Asociación Interamericana para la Defensa del Ambiente.

Chilton, A., and Versteeg, M., 2020. How Constitutional Rights Matter [online]. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190871451.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190871451.001.0001

Cooter, R.D., and Ginsburg, T., 1996. Comparative judicial discretion: An empirical test of economic models. International Review of Law and Economics [online], 16(3), 295–313. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(96)00018-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(96)00018-X

Couso, J., Huneeus, A., and Sieder, R., 2010. Cultures of Legality. Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America. In: J. Couso, A. Huneeus and R. Sieder, eds., Cultures of Legality. Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America [online]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 3–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730269.001

Cruz Rodríguez, M., 2019. Decisiones estructurales y seguimiento judicial en Colombia (1997–2017). Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional [online], 117, 167–202. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/redc.117.06 Dahl, R., 1957. Decision-making in democracy: The Supreme Court as national policy-maker. Journal of Public Law, 6(2), 279–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/redc.117.06

Epp, C.R., 1998. The Rights Revolution. Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective [online]. The Chicago University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226772424.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226772424.001.0001

Feeley, M., and Rubin, E., 2000. Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America‘s Prisons. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ferraz, O.L.M., 2021. Health as a Human Right. The Politics and Judicialisation of Health in Brazil [online]. New York: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108678605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108678605

Frank, J., 1970. Law and the Modern Mind. Gloucester: Peter Lang. (Originally published in 1930).

Gidi, A., and Ferrer, E., 2003. La Tutela de los Derechos Difusos, Colectivos e Individuales Homogéneos. Ciudad de México: Porrúa.

Graber, M., 1993. The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary. Studies in American Political Development [online], 7(1), 35–73. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X00000687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X00000687

Guerrero, R., et al., 2011. Sistema de salud de Colombia. Salud Pública México [online], 53(2), 144–155. Available at: https://www.scielosp.org/pdf/spm/2011.v53suppl2/s144-s155

Helmke, G., 2022. Courts and Judicial Manipulation. In: C. Hübner Mendes, R. Gargarella and S. Guidi, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Constitutional Law in Latin America [online]. New York: Oxford University Press, 416–429. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786900.013.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786900.013.26

Hirschl, R., 2008. The Judicialization of Politics. In: K. Whittington, R.D. Kelemen and G. Caldeira, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics [online]. New York: Oxford University Press, 119–141. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0008

Homedes, N., and Ugalde, A., 2005. Why neoliberal health reforms have failed in Latin America. Health Policy [online], 71(1), 83–96. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.01.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.01.011

Kapiszewski, D., Silverstein, G., and Kagan, R.A., 2013. Conclusions. Of judicial ships and winds of change. In: D. Kapiszewski, G. Silverstein and R.A. Kagan, eds., Consequential Courts. Judicial Roles in Global Perspective [online]. New York. Cambridge University Press, 398–412. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139207843.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139207843.021

Kennedy, D., 1997. A Critique of Adjudication (fin de siècle). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Klarman, M.J., 2007. Brown v. Board of Education and the Civil Rights Movement [online]. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195307467.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195307467.003.0003

Lamprea, E., 2011. La Constitución de 1991 y la crisis de la salud. Encrucijadas y salidas. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.

Landau, D., 2012. The reality of social rights enforcement. Harvard International Law Journal [online], 53(1), 190–247. Available at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles/557/

Langford, M., Rodríguez Garavito, C., and Rossi, J., 2017. Introduction: From Jurisprudence to Compliance. In: M. Langford, C. Rodríguez Garavito and J. Rossi, eds., Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance [online]. New York. Cambridge University Press, 3–42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316673058.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316673058.002

Lanius, D., 2019. Strategic Indeterminacy in the Law [online]. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190923693.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190923693.001.0001

Lorenzetti, R., 2014. El arte de juzgar. La intimidad de los casos más difíciles de la Corte Suprema. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.

Moraes, J., and Béjar, S., 2022. Electoral volatility and political polarization in developing democracies: Evidence from Latin America, 1993–2016. Party Politics [online], 29(4), 636–647. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221095098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221095098

Orihuela, J.C., 2014. Las reglas ambientales del desarrollo económico: la regulación de la contaminación del aire generada por las fundidoras de Chuquicamata y La Oroya. Economía [online], 37(74), 213–46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18800/economia.201402.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18800/economia.201402.006

Pistor, K., and Xu, C., 2003. Incomplete Law. New York University Journal of International Law and Policy [online], 35, 931–1013. Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1077/

Raimundo, M., 2018. Sistema de institucionalidad ambiental. A una década de la sentencia colectiva “Mendoza” por la contaminación del Riachuelo. Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Ambiental y Recursos Naturales [online], 30. Available at: https://classactionsargentina.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2018-raimundo-m_a-una-dc3a9cada-de-mendoza.pdf

Rodríguez-Garavito, C., and Rodríguez-Franco, D., 2015. Radical Deprivation on Trial. The Impact of Judicial Activism on Socioeconomic Rights in the Global South [online]. New York: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139940849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139940849

Sánchez Gómez, S., 2020. Las sentencias estructurales del Tribunal Constitucional peruano en el ámbito de los derechos socioeconómicos: salud y educación. Revista Ius et Veritas [online], 60, 146–58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202001.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202001.007

Segal, J., and Spaeth, H., 2002. The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited [online]. New York: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615696

Sigal, M., Rossi, J., and Morales, D., 2017. Argentina: Implementation of Collective Cases. In: M. Langford, C. Rodríguez Garavito and J. Rossi, Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance [online]. New York. Cambridge University Press, 140–176. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316673058.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316673058.006

Spieler, P., 2010. The La Oroya Case: The Relationship Between Environmental Degradation and Human Rights Violations. Human Rights Brief [online], 18(1), 19–23. Available at: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/hrbrief/vol18/iss1/4/

Staveland-Sæter, K., 2011. Litigating the Right to a Healthy Environment Assessing the Policy Impact of “The Mendoza Case.” Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute.

Stone Sweet, A., 2000. Governing with Judges. Constitutional Politics in Europe [online]. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198297718.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198297718.001.0001

Taylor, M., 2008. Judging Policy. Courts and Policy Reform in Democratic Brazil. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804758116.001.0001

Villalonga, C., 2024. Imperfect legislative agreements and judicial policymaking. A theoretical inquiry. The Theory and Practice of Legislation [online], 12(3), 253–280. Available at:https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2024.2351314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2024.2351314

Wang, D., 2013. Courts as Healthcare Policy-Makers: The Problem, The Responses to the Problem, and Problems in the Responses. São Paulo: Direito GV Research Paper 75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2335145

Yamin, A.E., Parra-Vera, O., and Gianella, C., 2011. Colombia. Judicial Protection to the Right to Health. An Elusive Promise. In: A.E. Yamin and S. Gloppen, eds., Litigating Health Rights. Can Courts Bring More Justice to Health? [online] Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjz81hc DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjz81hc.8