The concept of speed in Luhmann’s schemata: The case of the Russian criminal justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1733Keywords:
Criminal Justice, Luhmann, systems theory, speed, Russian studies on courtsAbstract
Notwithstanding Luhmann’s systems theory has a variety of concepts (code, structures, programs, operations, structural couplings, self-irritations, etc.) to analyze the Russian Criminal Justice as a self-referential system, it exhibits some limitations as well. A lack of fully-developed speed concept does not allow the autopoietic approach to adequately describe the Russian Criminal Justice System’s emphasis on the efficiency, which is measured by a high rate of convictions produced within the system per unit of time. Drawing primarily upon intuitions of systems theory itself, this paper reconstructs the speed as a schema for the observation of changes and the number of operations produced within the system per unit of time. At the most abstract level, the speed concept is a prerequisite for observing the rate and tempo of oscillation between sides of distinction per se. Exploiting these theoretical adjustments, it is shown that the Russian Criminal Justice System seeks to increase the rate of oscillation within guiding distinction “legally guilty (non-lawful)”/”legally non-guilty (lawful)”. In so doing, this system condenses most of meanings on the side “legally guilty” (connectivity value), minimizes the horizon of possibilities related to jury trials and due process rights, and decelerates a speed of reverse crossing to the side “legally non-guilty” (reflexive value).
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
13(S1)_Skoblik_OSLS 166
XML_13(S1)_Skoblik_OSLS 17
References
Andersen, N.A., and Born, A.W., 2000. Complexity and change: Two “Semantic Tricks” in the triumphant oscillating organization. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 13(3), 297–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009511026806
Antonovsky, A., 2007. Niklas Luman: epistemologicheskoe vvedenie v teoriyu social'nyh sistem [Niklas Luhmann: An Epistemological Introduction to the Theory of Social Systems]. IFRAN.
Baraldi, C., Corsi, G., and Esposito, E., 2021. Unlocking Luhmann. Bielefeld University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839456743
Barros, M.A., 2021. Observing courts: an organisational sociology for socio-legal research. In: C.F. Campilongo, L.F. Amato and M.A. Barros, eds., Luhmann and Socio-Legal Research: An Empirical Agenda for Social Systems Theory. Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 141–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003120391-11
Borch, C., 2012. Functional eclecticism: On Luhmann's style of theorizing. Revue internationale de philosophie, 259(1), 123–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rip.259.0123
Durkheim, É., 1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press.
Francot, L., 2020. Sociology of legal temporalities. In: J. Přibáň, ed., Research Handbook on the Sociology of Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 190–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789905182.00023
Gonçalves, G.L., 2017. Functional differentiation as ideology of the (neo)colonial society. Thesis Eleven, 143(1), 70–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513617741165
Grabham, E., and Beynon-Jones, S.M., 2019. Introduction. In: E. Grabham and S.M. Beynon-Jones, eds., Law and Time. Abingdon: Routledge, 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167695-1
Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the RF, 2021. Otchet o rabote sudov obshchej yurisdikcii po rassmotreniyu ugolovnyh del po pervoj instancii [The report on the work of general jurisdiction courts in handling criminal cases as courts of the first instance] (online). Available at: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79&item=5671
Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the RF, 2023. Otchet o rabote sudov obshchej yurisdikcii po rassmotreniyu ugolovnyh del po pervoj instancii [The report on the work of general jurisdiction courts in handling criminal cases as courts of the first instance] (online). Available at: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79&item=7096
Khodzhaeva, E., 2023. When juries come to Russian district courts: Lay participation expansion and court system noncompliance. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 31(2), 217–248. Available at: https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/280/article/889915
King, M., and Thornhill, C., 2003. Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Politics and Law. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503588
Lange, B., 2021. Regulation without interests? An introduction to Luhmannian empirical mapping of system-environment relationships. In: C.F. Campilongo, L.F. Amato and M.A. Barros, eds., Luhmann and Socio-Legal Research: An Empirical Agenda For Social Systems Theory. Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 71–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003120391-7
Latour, B., 2005. Trains of thought: The fifth dimension and its fabrication In: A.N. Perret-Clermont, ed., Thinking Time: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Time. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber, 173–187.
Luhmann, N., 1976. The future cannot begin: temporal structures in modern society. Social Research, 43(1), 130–152.
Luhmann, N., 1988. Tautology and paradox in the self-descriptions of modern society. Sociological Theory, 6(1), 21–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/201911
Luhmann, N., 1990a. Essays on Self-Reference. Columbia University Press.
Luhmann, N., 1990b. The cognitive program of constructivism and a reality that remains unknown In: W. Krohn, G. Küppers and H. Nowotny, eds., Selforganization. Sociology of the Sciences (A Yearbook). Dordrecht: Springer, 64–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2975-8_5
Luhmann, N., 1995. Social Systems (writing science). Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Luhmann, N., 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, N., 2004. Law as a Social System. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198262381.001.0001
Luhmann, N., 2013. Introduction to Systems Theory. Londres: Polity Press.
McCarthy, L., 2015. Trafficking Justice: How Russian Police Enforce New Laws, From Crime to Courtroom. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9780801453892.001.0001
Moiseeva, E., 2014. Working groups in the courts of St. Petersburg. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 17(4), 86–100.
Nobles, R., and Schiff, D., 2013a. Observing Law through Systems Theory. Oxford: Hart.
Nobles, R., and Schiff, D., 2013b. Structural coupling between the systems of law and the media: the contrasting examples of criminal conviction and criminal appeal In: A. Febbrajo and G. Harste, eds., Law and Intersystemic Communication. Farnham: Ashgate, 317–326.
Nuotio, K., 2010. Systems theory with discourse ethics: Squaring the circle? Comment on Marcelo Neve’s Zwischen Themis und Leviathan. No Foundations: journal of extreme legal positivism, 7, 59–85.
Ostrom, B.J., et al., 2007. Trial Courts as Organizations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Packer, H.L., 1964. Two models of the criminal process. University of Pennsylvania Law Review [online], 113(1), 1–68. Available at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6428&context=penn_law_review DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3310562
Packer, H.L., 1968. The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804780797
Paneyakh, E., 2014. Faking performance together: systems of performance evaluation in Russian enforcement agencies and production of bias and privilege. Post-Soviet Affairs 30(2–3), 115–136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2013.858525
Paneyakh, E., Titaev, K., and Shklyaruk, M., 2018. Traektoriya ugolovnogo dela: institucional'nyj analiz [The Trajectory of the Criminal Case: An Institutional Analysis]. St. Petersburg: EUSP Press.
Paterson, J., and Teubner, G., 2021. Changing maps: Empirical legal autopoiesis. In: C.F. Campilongo, L.F. Amato and M.A. Barros, eds., Luhmann and Socio-Legal Research: An Empirical Agenda For Social Systems Theory. Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 33–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003120391-5
Petrukhin, I.L., 2009. Opravdatel'nyy prigovor i pravo na reabilitatsiyu [Acquittal and the Right to Rehabilitation]. Moscow: Prospect.
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A., 2009. Niklas Luhmann: Law, Justice, Society. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203872086
Qvortrup, L., 2005. Society’s educational system – An introduction to Niklas Luhmann’s pedagogical theory. Seminar.net – International journal of media, technology and lifelong learning, 1(1), 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.2534
Silva, A.S., 2020. Legal decision in socio-legal research: systemic elements to observe the construction of sense in law In: M.A. Barros, L.F. Amato and G.F. Fonseca, eds., World Society’s Law: Rethinking Systems Theory and Socio-Legal Studies [online]. Porto Alegre: Fi, 251–301.
Skoblik, K.V., 2022. Coping with the undesired consequences of jury reform: How does the Russian criminal justice system control an acquittals spike over the reform 2018–2020? Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 12(4), 790–821. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1268
Skoblik, K., 2023. The human rights backlash in criminal justice: The case of Russia’s exit from the European Convention on Human Rights. EJIL:Talk!. [online], 1 August. Available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-human-rights-backlash-in-criminal-justice-the-case-of-russias-exit-from-the-european-convention-on-human-rights/
Solomon, P.H., 1987. The case of the vanishing acquittal: informal norms and the practice of soviet criminal justice. Soviet Studies, 39(4), 531–555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668138708411718
Solomon, P.H., 2015. Understanding Russia’s low rate of acquittal: pretrial screening and the problem of accusatorial bias. Review of Central and East European Law, 40(1), 1–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-40012001
Teubner, G., 1993. Law as an Autopoietic System. Padstow: T.J. Press.
The State Duma of the Russian Federation, 2023. Federal'nyj Zakon N 216 “O vnesenii izmeneniya v stat'yu 30 Ugolovno-processual'nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii” [Law No. (216) “On Amendments to the Article 30 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation”] (online). Available at: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/291794-8
Thornhill, C., 2012. Sociological enlightenments and the sociology of political philosophy. Revue internationale de philosophie., 1(259), 55–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rip.259.0055
Virilio, P., 1994. The Vision Machine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Konstantin Skoblik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
