Beyond bars, coercion and death: Rethinking abortion rights and justice in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1680Keywords:
Carceral politics, access to safe abortion, fear of prosecution, decriminalization, reproductive justiceAbstract
The legal framework governing abortion in India is, at its core, a cis-hetero-patriarchal framework that regulates pregnant persons' bodies using a punitive criminal justice system. The criminal framework encompasses Sections 312-318 IPC, provisions of the POCSO Act, and the PCPNDT Act, which prescribe significant state surveillance and allow for largely unchecked intimidation by law enforcement of both abortion providers and abortion seekers. Several case laws show the “chilling effect” of criminalization on healthcare providers, leading them to hesitate to provide safe abortion services. The stigma around abortions perpetuated by criminalization, leaves pregnant persons with limited reproductive choices – these include either availing of safe abortions and risking prosecution, availing of unsafe abortions and risking adverse health outcomes, or carrying unwanted pregnancies to term and avoiding prenatal and maternal healthcare. Criminalization disproportionately affects marginalized communities, with examples of legal reform showing carceral approaches' disregard for structural factors affecting certain groups' access to fundamental rights and healthcare services. It is, therefore, imperative to decriminalize abortion completely, framing avenues for redressal within a reproductive justice framework. The proposal to completely abolish penal provisions that govern forced abortions begets concerns about leaving marginalized pregnant persons who frequently experience forced abortions with no legal recourse. This feminist dilemma that ensues requires the adoption of decarceral, intersectional approaches that maintain structures of accountability for harm done, without posing any risk to the rights of marginalized pregnant persons.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
14(1)_Jain_OSLS 669
XML_14(1)_Jain_OSLS 82
References
Ahluwalia, S., 2010. Reproductive restraints: Birth control in India 1877–1947. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Armstrong, E., 2013. Gender and Neoliberalism: The All India Democratic Women’s Association and Globalization Politics. London: Routledge.
Bagaric, M., Hunter, D., and Svilar, J., 2021. Prison Abolition. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 111(2), 351–406.
Baker, D., Keogh, S., and Luchsinger, G., 2022. Seeing the unseen: the case for action in the neglected crisis of unintended pregnancy. State of World Population 2022. Report. United Nations Population Fund.
Baxi, P., 2013. Public secrets of law: Rape trials in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198089568.001.0001
Baxi, P., 2016. Carceral Feminism’ as Judicial Bias: The Discontents around State v Mahmood Farooqui. Interdisciplinary Law, 3, 1–30.
Canes-Wrone, B., and Dorf, M., 2015. Measuring the Chilling Effect. New York University Law Review, 90, 1095–1114.
Chakravarti, U., 2003. Gendering caste: Through a feminist lens. London: Sage.
Chandra, A., et al., 2021. Legal Barriers to Accessing Safe Abortion Services in India: A Fact-Finding Study [online]. Center for Reproductive Rights. Available at: https://reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Legal-Barriers-to-Accessing-Safe-Abortion-Services-in-India_Final-for-upload.pdf
Clegg, J., and Usmani, A., 2019. The economic origins of mass incarceration. Catalyst, 3(3), 9–53.
Davis, A.Y., 2003. Are prisons obsolete? New York: Seven Stories Press.
Express News Service, 2022. Maharashtra: Wardha doctor, 2 nurses arrested for carrying out abortion on 13-year-old. Indian Express [online], 14 January. Available at: https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/wardha-doctor-nurses-arrested-abortion-on-13-year-old-7722092/
Finer, L.B., and Hussain, R., 2013. Unintended pregnancy and unsafe abortion in the Philippines: context and consequences. In Brief, 3. New York: Guttmacher Institute.
Foucault, M., 2012. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.
Gottschalk, M., 2015. Bring It on: The Future of Penal Reform, the Carceral State, and American Politics. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 12, 559.
Grover, V., 2015. Citadels Of Power and Impunity, Disturbed but Not Dislodged. In: M. Verwoerd and C. Lopes, eds., Sexualized Violence in the National Debate: Cross-border Observations on India and South Africa. Cape Town: Heinrich Böll Foundation, 114–129.
Gutierrez, N., 2018. Secret service: Underground doctors induce safe abortions. The Rappler [online], 20 August. Available at: https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/investigative/209891-underground-doctors-induce-safe-abortions-philippines/
Hillyard, P., and Tombs, S., 2007. From ‘crime’to social harm? Crime, law and social change [online], 48, 9-25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-007-9079-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-007-9079-z
Hirve, S.S., 2004. Abortion law, policy and services in India: A critical review. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(sup24), 114–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(04)24017-4
Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Jain, D., 2019. Time to Rethink Criminalisation of Abortion? Towards a Gender Justice Approach. NUJS Law Review, 12(1).
Jain, D., and Kartik, K., 2020. Unjust Citizenship: The Law That Isn’t. NUJS Law Review, 13(2).
Jain, D., and Tronic, B., 2019. Conflicting abortion laws in India: Unintended barriers to safe abortion for adolescent girls. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics [online], OctDec;4(4) NS:310-17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20529/ijme.2019.059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2019.059
Kafer, G., and Grinberg, D., 2019. Editorial: Queer Surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 17(5), 592–601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i5.13541
Kapur, R., 2020. Gender and the “faith” in law: equality, secularism, and the rise of the Hindu nation. Journal of Law and Religion, 35(3), 407–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2020.42
Kapur, R., and Cossman, B., 2018. Subversive sites 20 years later: rethinking feminist engagements with law. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 44(2), 265–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2018.1521257
Keown, J., 2002. Abortion, doctors and the law: Some aspects of the legal regulation of abortion in England from 1803 to 1982. Cambridge University Press, 26-49.
Kim, S., Young, N., and Lee, Y., 2019. The role of reproductive justice movements in challenging South Korea’s abortion ban. Health and Human Rights, 21(2), 97–107. PMID: 31885440; PMCID: PMC6927381.
Laude, P., 2012. Student dies from abortion; midwife, aide arrested. Phil Star [online], 1 April. Available at: https://www.philstar.com/metro/2012/04/01/792774/studentdies-abortion-midwife-aide-arrested
Lopreite, D., 2023. The long road to abortion rights in Argentina (1983–2020). Bulletin of Latin American Research [online], 42(3), 357-371. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.13350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.13350
Mandal, S., 2018. Section 377: Whose Concerns Does the Judgment Address? Engage, 53(37), 1–8.
McGlynn, C., 2022. Challenging anti-carceral feminism: Criminalisation, justice and continuum thinking. Women’s Studies International Forum, vol. 93, 102614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102614
Mehta, K., and Tiwari, A., 2021. Between Sexual Violence and Autonomy: Rethinking the Engagement of the Indian Women’s Movement with Criminal Law. German Law Journal [online], 22(5), 860–877. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.40 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.40
Pal, A., 2023. How Has SC/ST Act Evolved, What Are the Outstanding Issues in Realising Its Objectives? Outlook Weekender [online] 2 April. Available at: https://www.outlookindia.com/national/how-has-sc-st-act-evolved-what-are-the-outstanding-issues-in-realising-its-objectives-weekender_story-275436
Patel, P., Das, M., and Das, U., 2018. The perceptions, health-seeking behaviours and access of Scheduled Caste women to maternal health services in Bihar, India. Reproductive health matters, 26(54), 114–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1533361
Puvanesvaran, K., 2020. Abortion in Malaysia [online]. 5 December. Thomas Philip Advoc. & Solic. Available at: https://www.thomasphilip.com.my/articles/abortion-in-malaysia/
Rao, A., 2009. The caste question: Dalits & the politics of modern India. Oakland: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520943377
Ross, L., 2011. Understanding reproductive justice. Off Our Backs, 36(4), 14–19.
Rowena, J. 2017. The “sexual harassment” discourse: A Bahujan Woman’s perspective. Raiot.in, 21 November.
Rubin, G.S., 2002. Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In: R. Parker and P. Aggleton, eds., Culture, Society and Sexuality A Reader. London: Routledge, 143–178.
Sahai, S., 2017. Mapping the Nation: Performance Art in India and Narratives of Nationalism and Citizenship. In: B. Dutt, J. Reinelt and S. Sahai, eds., Gendered Citizenship: Manifestations and Performance [online]. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 99-116. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59093-6_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59093-6_6
Saxena, K.B., 2018. Legislature Proposes, Judiciary Disposes: Supreme Court’s ruling on the Atrocities Act. Social Change, 48(2), 275–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049085718775369
Sen, J., 2016. Three-Quarters of Death Row Prisoners are from Lower Castes or Religious Minorities. The Wire [online], 6 May. Available at: https://thewire.in/law/three-quarters-of-death-row-prisoners-are-from-lower-castes-or-religious-minorities
Sharafi, M., 2021. Abortion in South Asia 1860-1947: A medico-legal history. Modern Asian Studies, 55(2), 371–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X19000234
Sonavane, N., 2017. Rape as an Atrocity: Analysis of Judgments Delivered by the District Court of Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Law Review, Government Law College, 9, 69–93.
Sreenivas, M., 2021. Feminism, family planning and national planning. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 44(2), 313–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2021.1886731
Teltumbde, A., 2018. Republic of caste: Thinking equality in the time of neoliberal Hindutva. New Delhi: Navayana.
Thummar, P., 2020. Bombay High Court Allows 16-Year-Old Rape Survivor to Terminate 24-Week Pregnancy. Law Street Journal [online], 11 May. Available at: https://lawstreet.co/judiciary/bombay-high-court-pregnant-woman
Travis, J., and Western, B., 2021. The era of punitive excess [online]. 13 April. Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law. Available at: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/era-punitive-excess
Winters, J.D., and McLaughlin, R.A., 2020. Soft Sterilization: Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives in the Carceral State. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work [online], 35(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109919882320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109919882320
Yokoe, R., et al., 2019. Unsafe abortion and abortion-related death among 1.8 million women in India. BMJ global health, 4(3), e001491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001491
Zampas, C., and Gher, J.M., 2008. Abortion as a human right—international and regional standards. Human Rights Law Review [online], 8(2), 249-294. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngn008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngn008
Zureick, A., et al., 2018. Physicians’ challenges under El Salvador’s criminal abortion prohibition. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics [online], 143(1), 121–126. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12596
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dipika Jain
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
