Law and hostile design in the city

Imposing decorum and visibility regimes in the urban environment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1306

Keywords:

Hostile design, law and urban objects, decorum, visibility regimes, right to the city

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to examine new trends in the regulation of access to public space, looking at the legal implications of the adoption of hostile architecture and objects as a widespread tendency in urban design. The paper approaches the rising interest in hostile architecture and design with the aim to show the normative aspects of such a trend and how law contributes to shaping an urban space more prone to the insertion of hostile urban objects in it. I begin with a brief discussion of attempts to define and understanding hostile architecture through some examples and showing how the topic matters for legal and socio-legal studies. Then, drawing on examples from Italian legislation, I analyze how the link between “decorum” and hostile architecture shapes public spaces and how this helps to create a specific regime of visibility and expulsion for certain categories of people. Finally, I make some concluding remarks on how hostile design represents a challenge for re-thinking cities in more inclusive terms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

        Metrics

Views 3378
Downloads:
PDF_12_3_Nitrato_Izzo_OSLS 2141
XML_12_3_Nitrato_Izzo_OSLS 1096


Author Biography

Valerio Nitrato Izzo, University of Naples Federico II, Department of Law

Assistant professor, Università di Napoli Federico II. Contact details: Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza, Via Porta di Massa 32, 8° 80138 Napoli, Italy. Email: valerio.nitratoizzo@unina.it

References

Auby, J.B., 2013. Droit de la ville: Du fonctionnement juridique des villes au droit à la Ville. Paris: LexisNexis.

Bauman, Z., 2005. Fiducia e paura nella città. Milan: Bruno Mondadori.

Bernardini, M.G., and Giolo, O., 2021. Introduzione. Dalla critica del soggetto alla critica degli spazi. In: M.G. Bernardini and O. Giolo, eds., Abitare i diritti: Per una critica del rapporto tra giustizia e spazi urbani. Pisa: Pacini, 7–15.

Blank, Y., and Rosen-Zvi, I., 2010. The Spatial Turn in Legal Theory. HAGAR: Studies in Culture, Polity & Identities, 10(1), 37–60.

Blomley, N., 2008. Making Space for Law. In: K.R. Cox, M. Low and J. Robinson, eds., The Sage Handbook of Political Geography. London: Sage, 155–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607880.n10

Branco, P., 2019. City/Courthouse Building: A Mirror Game. Examining Connections Between Courthouse Buildings and Location in the Urban Environment. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 32, 597–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-019-09622-7

Bukovski, W., 2019. La buona educazione degli oppressi: Piccola storia del decoro. Rome: Alegre.

Butler, J., 2015. Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674495548

Dal Lago, A., and Giordano, S., 2018. Sporcare i muri: Graffiti, decoro, proprietà privata. Rome: Derive Approdi.

Davis, M., 1990. City of Quartz: Excavating the future in Los Angeles. New York: Vintage Books.

de Fine Licht, K., 2020. “Hostile architecture” and its confederates: A conceptual framework for how we should perceive our cities and the objects in them. Canadian Journal of Urban Research [online], 29(2), 1–17. Available from: https://cjur.uwinnipeg.ca/index.php/cjur/article/download/290/145/ [Accessed 26 April 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2022.2025654

Duneier, M., 2000. Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Flusty, S., 1994. Building Paranoia: The Proliferation of Interdictory Space and the Erosion of Spatial Justice. Los Angeles Public Library.

Foucault, M., 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House.

Fuller, L., 1958. Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart. Harvard Law Review, 1(4), 630–672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1338226

Gerrard, J., and Farrugia, D., 2015, The “lamentable sight” of homelessness and the society of the spectacle. Urban Studies [online], 52(12), 2219–2233. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014542135 [Accessed 26 April 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014542135

Grigolo, M., 2019. The Human Rights City: New York, San Francisco, Barcelona. New York/Oxon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315628530

Joyce, P., 2003. The Rule of Freedom: Liberalism and the Modern City. London/New York: Verso Books.

Kang, H.Y, and Kendall, S., 2020. Legal Materiality. In: M. Del Mar, B. Meyler and S. Stern, eds., Oxford Handbook for Law and the Humanities. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190695620.013.9

Katyal, N.K., 2002. Architecture as Crime Control. Yale Law Journal, 111(5), 1039–1139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/797618

Klinenberg, E., 2018. Palaces for the People: How Social Infrastructure Can Help Fight Inequality, Polarization, and the Decline of Civic Life. London: Penguin.

Lefebvre, H., 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lessig, L., 1999. Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.

Lieto, L., 2017. How material objects become urban things? City, 21(5), 568–579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1374782

Lorini, G., and Moroni, S., 2020. Ruling without Rules: Not Only Nudges. Regulation beyond Normativity. Global Jurist, 20(3), 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2019-0051

Macherey, P., 2009. De Canguilhem à Foucault, la force des normes. Paris: Fabrique.

Massey, D., 2005. For Space. London: Sage.

Mitchell, D., 2003. The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York/London: Guildford Press.

Mohr, R., 2019. Urban space and collective action: The city as a site of enactment and denial of rights [online]. Draft Paper. 17 August. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/40114346/Urban_space_and_collective_action_The_city_as_a_site_of_enactment_and_denial_of_rights [Accessed 26 April 2022].

Moroni, S., and Chiodelli, F., 2014. Municipal regulations and the use of public space: local ordinances in Italy. City, Territory and Architecture [online], 1(11), 1–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/2195-2701-1-11 [Accessed 26 April 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2195-2701-1-11

Mubi Brighenti, A., 2010. Visibility in Social Theory and Social Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230282056

Nitrato Izzo, V., 2017. Gli spazi giuridici della città contemporanea: Rappresentazioni e pratiche. Naples: Editoriale Scientifica.

Oomen, B., Davis, M.F., and Grigolo, M., eds., 2016. Global Urban Justice. The Rise of Human Rights Cities. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316544792

Petty, J., 2016. The London spikes controversy: homelessness, urban securitisation and the question of “hostile architecture“. International journal for crime, justice and social democracy [online], 5(1), 67–81. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i1.286 [Accessed 26 April 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i1.286

Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A., 2015. Spatial justice: Body, Lawscape, Atmosphere. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315780528

Pitch, T., 2013. Contro il decoro: L’uso politico della pubblica decenza. Rome/Bari: Laterza.

Quinn, B., 2014. Anti-homeless spikes are part of a wider phenomenon of “hostile architecture“. The Guardian [online], 13 June. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2014/jun/13/anti-homeless-spikes-hostile-architecture [Accessed 26 April 2022].

Rancière, J., 2000. Le Partage du sensible : Esthétique et politique. Paris: La fabrique. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/lafab.ranci.2000.01

Rosenberger, R., 2017. Callous objects: Designs against the Homeless. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/9781452958538

Rosenberger, R., 2020. On hostile design: Theoretical and empirical prospects. Urban Studies, 57(4), 883–893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019853778

Sassen, S., 2014. Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369818

Savičić, G., and Savić, S., eds., 2013. Unpleasant Design. Belgrade: G.L.O.R.I.A.

Savicic, G., and Savic, S., no date. Interview with Factory Furniture Design Team: On benefits of Unpleasant Design. Un.pleas.ant de.sign [online]. Available from: https://unpleasant.pravi.me/interview-with-factory-furniture-design-team/ [Accessed 26 April 2022].

Schindler, S., 2015. Architectural Exclusion: Discrimination and Segregation Through Physical Design of the Built Environment. Yale Law Journal [online], 124(6), 1934–2024. Available from: https://www.yalelawjournal.org/article/architectural-exclusion [Accessed 26 April 2022].

Sennett, R., 2018. Building and Dwelling: Ethics for the City. London: Allen Lane.

Sudjic, D., 2016. The Language of Cities. London: Allen Lane.

Valverde, M., 2009. Laws of the Street. City & Society, 21(2),163–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-744X.2009.01020.x

Volcler, J., 2011. Le son comme arme : Les usages policiers et militaires du son. Paris: La Découverte.

Waldron, J., 1991. Homelessness and the issue of freedom. UCLA Law Review, 39(2), 295–324.

Winner, L., 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–36.

Published

01-06-2022

How to Cite

Nitrato Izzo, V. (2022) “Law and hostile design in the city: Imposing decorum and visibility regimes in the urban environment”, Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 12(3), pp. 522–539. doi: 10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1306.