Integrating “storytelling” as a method in judicial processes?
The case of Justicia Especial para la Paz
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1271Keywords:
Colombia, transitional justice, storytelling, criminal law, justicia transicional, narración, derecho penalAbstract
This paper examines how Colombia’s Justicia Especial para la Paz (JEP) emerges as a tribunal within which the roles of history, politics, and transitional justice becomes contested. The paper starts by placing the JEP in a historical, social, and political context. Building on the contextualization, it focuses on how the JEP appears to be an extension of the five-decade long conflict in Colombia in its attempt to deal with the past. The paper underscores how punishing “bad” things is not an easy task. Against this background, the paper challenges the boundaries of criminal liability by discussing and analyzing “storytelling” as an alternative to truth-telling in the JEP in order to not only provide additional nuances to the conflict, but also as a way to, at least theoretically, tie different social collectives together in a post-conflict society and enable the courtroom to function constructively with difficult social issues in the aftermath of cataclysm.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF_12_4_Strandberg_OSLS 355
XML_12_4_Strandberg_OSLS 78
References
Akhavan, P., 2012. Reducing Genocide to Law: Definition, Meaning, and the Ultimate Crime. Cambridge University Press.
Ambos, K., 2021. Treatise on International Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Amstutz, M., 2005. The Healing of Nations: The Promise and Limits of Political Forgiveness. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Baaz, M., 2015. The “Dark Side” of International Criminal Law: The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 60(1), 158–186.
Baaz, M., and Lilja, M., 2016. Using International Criminal Law to Resist Transitional Justice. Conflict and Society: Advances in Research [online], 2(1), 142–159. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3167/arcs.2016.020113 [Accessed 10 March 2021].
Bandes, S., 1999. The Passions of Law. New York University Press.
Bar-On, D., 1996. Attempting to Overcome the Intergenerational Transmission of Trauma. In: J. Apfel and B. Simon, eds., Minefields in Their Hearts: The Mental Health of Children in War and Communal Violence. New Haven: Yale University Press, 165–188.
Bermúdez Liévano, A., 2019. In Colombia, Transitional Justice Is Caught Up in Politics. JusticeInfo [online], 30 July. Available from: https://www.justiceinfo.net/en/42052-colombia-transitional-justice-is-caught-up-in-politics.html [Accessed 10 March 2021].
Björkdahl, A., and Warvsten, L., 2021. Friction in Transitional Justice Processes: The Colombian Judicial System and the ICC. International Journal of Transitional Justice [online], 00, 1–22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijab018 [Accessed 9 February 2022].
Borneman, J., 1997. Settling Accounts: Violence, Justice and Accountability in Postsocialist Europe. Princeton University Press.
Botero, S., 2020. Trust in Colombia’s Justicia Especial Para La Paz: Experimental Evidence. Journal of Politics in Latin America [online], 12(3), 300–322. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X20959509 [Accessed 10 March 2021].
Bruncevic, M., 2022. Regulating Transnational Heritage: Memory, Identity and Diversity. New York: Routledge.
Buchanan, R., 2008. Writing Resistance into International Law. International Community Law Review, 10(4), 445–454.
Bull, H., and Watson, A., 1984. The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Chernick, M.W., 2003. Does Injustice Cause Violence? In: S.E. Eckstein and T.O. Wickham-Crowley, eds., What Justice? Whose Justice? Fighting for Fairness in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press, 185–214.
Colombia–FARC Peace Agreement, 2016. Final Agreement to End the Armed Conflict and Build a Stable and Lasting Peace [online]. 24 November. Available from: https://www.peaceagreements.org/generateAgreementPDF/1845 [Accessed 10 March 2021].
Colprensa, 2020. Duque a las Farc: Esperamos la verdad sobre secuestros El presidente de la República, Iván Duque, respondió de esta manera las declaraciones dadas por Rodrigo Londoño. El Universal [online], 16 September. Available from: https://www.eluniversal.com.co/colombia/duque-a-las-farc-esperamos-la-verdad-sobre-secuestros-YK3491735 [Accessed 14 February 2022].
D’Amato, A., 1985. Nicaragua and International Law: The “Academic” and the “Real”. Faculty Working Papers [online], Paper 135. Available from: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1134&context=facultyworkingpapers [Accessed 10 March 2020].
Damaška, M., 2008. What Is the Point of International Criminal Justice? Chicago-Kent Law Review [online], 83(1), 329–365. Available from: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol83/iss1/15/ [Accessed 9 February 2022].
Drumbl, M., 2005. Collective Violence and Individual Punishment: The Criminality of Mass Atrocity. Northwestern University Law Review [online], 99(2), 539–610. Available from: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035&context=wlufac [Accessed 9 February 2022].
Duffy, H., 2005. The “War on Terror” and the Framework of International Law. Cambridge University Press.
Dukalskis, A., 2011. Interactions in Transition: How Truth Commissions and Trials Complement or Constrain Each Other. International Studies Review [online], 13(3), 432–451. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2011.01014.x [Accessed 9 February 2022].
Elster, J., 2004. Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Eltringham, N., 2017. The Judgement Is Not Made Mow; The Judgement Will Be Made in the Future: “Politically Motivated” Defense Lawyers and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’s “Historical Record.” Humanity [online], 13 July. Available from: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/70233/2/09.-N.-EltringhamJudgement-Is-not-Made-Now.pdf [Accessed 9 March 2021].
Emblad, P., 2020. Det civilrättsliga i svensk inkomstskatterätt [Substance and Function – Theories on Private Law within Swedish Income Taxation]. Doctoral thesis, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Emblin, R., 2021. Colombia’s JEP Indicts Former FARC on War Crimes for Kidnapping. The City Paper [online], 28 January. Available from: http://thecitypaperbogota.com/news/colombias-justice-tribunal-indicts-former-farc-on-war-crimes-for-kidnapping/26594 [Accessed 10 March 2021].
Esquirol, J.L., 2000. Can International Law Help? An Analysis of the Colombian Peace Process. Connecticut Journal of International Law [online], 16(1), 23–93. Available from: https://ecollections.law.fiu.edu/faculty_publications/329 [Accessed 9 February 2022].
FARC, 2015. 5 Arguments Against the Legal Framework for Peace. FARC-EP International [online], 6 July. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20171125192019/http://farc-epeace.org/background/item/778-5-arguments-against-the-legal-framework-for-peace.html [Accessed 14 February 2022].
Flower, L., 2018. Doing Loyalty: Defense Lawyers’ Subtle Dramas in the Courtroom. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 47(2), 226–254.
Foggin, S., 2019. JEP budget for 2020 to reduce by 30 percent. The Bogotá Post [online], 15 July. Available from: https://thebogotapost.com/jep-budget-for-2020-to-reduce-by-30-percent/39310/ [Accessed 14 February 2022].
Friedlander, S., 1994. Trauma, Memory, and Transference. In: G. Hartmann, ed., Holocaust Remembrance: The Shapes of Memory. Oxford: Blackwell, 252–263.
Gidley, R., 2019. Illiberal Transitional Justice and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gidley, R., and Turner, M., 2018. Judicializing History: Mass Crimes Trials and the Historian as Expert Witness in West Germany, Cambodia, and Bangladesh. Genocide Studies and Prevention [online], 9(3), 52–67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.12.3.1566 [Accessed 9 February 2022].
Gilroy, P., 2004. After Empire: Melancholia or Convivial Culture? Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
Goldstone, R., 1998. Bringing War Criminals to Justice during an Ongoing War. In: J. Moore, ed., Hard Choices: Moral Dilemmas in Humanitarian Intervention. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 195–210.
González González, F., 2014. Poder y violencia en Colombia. Bogotá: Odecofi-Cinep-Colciencias.
Harber, K., and Pennebaker, J., 1992. Overcoming Traumatic Memories. In: S.A. Christianson, ed., The Handbook of Emotion and Memory: Research and Theory. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 359–387.
Heller, K.J., and Simpson, G., 2013. The Hidden Histories of War Crimes Trials. Oxford University Press.
Historical Memory Group (GMH), 2016. BASTA YA! Colombia: Memories of War and Dignity [online]. Bogotá: Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica (CNMH). Available from: http://centrodememoriahistorica.gov.co/descargas/informes2016/basta-ya-ingles/BASTA-YA-ingles.pdf [Accessed 9 February 2022].
Holtermann, J.H., 2017. “One of the Challenges That Can Plausibly Be Raised Against Them”? On the Role of Truth in Debates About the Legitimacy of International Criminal Tribunals. In: N. Hayashi and C. Bailliet, eds., The Legitimacy of International Criminal Tribunals. Oxford University Press, 206–227.
International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), 2019. Colombia: The Special Jurisdiction for Peace, Analysis One Year and a Half After its Entry into Operation [online]. June. Geneva: International Commission of Jurists. Available from: https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Colombia-Jurisd-para-la-paz-PUBLICATIONS-Reports-Fact-finding-mission-report-2019-ENG.pdf [Accessed 10 March 2021].
International Criminal Court (ICC), 2016. Draft Policy Paper on Case Selection and Prioritization [online]. 20 February. The Hague: Office of the Prosecutor of the ICC. Available from: https://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/otp/29.02.16_Draft_Policy-Paper-on-Case-Selection-and-Prioritisation_ENG.pdf [Accessed 14 February 2022].
International Crisis Group (ICG), 2018. Risky Business: The Duque Government’s Approach to Peace in Colombia [online]. 21 June 2018. Brussels: International Crisis Group. Available from: https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/067-risky-business-the-duque-governments-approach_0.pdf [Accessed, 14 February 2022].
Jain, N., 2018. Radical Dissents in International Criminal Trials. European Journal of International Law [online], 28(4), 1163–1186. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx072 [Accessed 10 March 2021].
Jiménez, T., 2014. The Real Focus of the Discussion on Victims. FARC-EP International [online], 28 July. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20171125144009/http:/farc-epeace.org/blogs/timoleon-jimenez/item/463-the-real-focus-of-the-discussion-on-victims.html [Accessed 19 December 2021].
Justicia Especial para la Paz (JEP), 2019. Comprehensive System of Truth Justice Reparation and Non-Repetition (SIVJRNR) [online]. Available from: https://www.jep.gov.co/Infografas/SIVJRNR_EN.pdf [Accessed 17 December 2021].
Kearney, R., 2002. On Stories. London: Routledge.
Kelly, C.D., 2017. Contextual Complementarity: Assessing Unwillingness and Genuine Prosecutions in Colombia’s Special Jurisdiction for Peace. Georgetown Journal of International Law [online], 48(3), 807–838. Available from: https://www.law.georgetown.edu/international-law-journal/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2018/05/48-3-Contextual-Complementarity.pdf [Accessed 9 February 2022].
Kennedy, D., 1987. International Legal Structures. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Kiss, E., 2000. Moral Ambition Within and Beyond Political Constraints: Reflections on Restorative Justice. In: R. Rotberg and D. Thompson, eds., Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press, 68–99.
Kohler, L., and Saner, H., 1992. Hannah Arendt–Karl Jaspers Correspondence 1926–1969. New York: Mariner Books.
Koskenniemi, M., 2002. Between Impunity and Show Trials. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 6(1), 1–35.
Koskenniemi, M., 2011. The Politics of International Law. Oxford: Hart. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199565665.003.0002
Koskenniemi, M., 2016. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge University Press.
Laplante, L.J., and Theison, K., 2006. Transitional Justice in Times of Conflict: Colombia’s Ley de Justicia Paz. Michigan Journal of International Law [online], 28(1), 49–108. Available from: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol28/iss1/2 [Accessed 9 February 2022].
Lévinas, E., 1969. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Luban, D., 2011. Hannah Arendt as a Theorist of International Criminal Law. International Criminal Law Review, 11(3), 621–641.
May, L., and Hoskins, Z., 2010. Introduction. In: L. May and Z. Hoskins, eds., International Criminal Law and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Mégret, F., 2013. International Criminal Justice: A Critical Research Agenda. In: C. Schwöbel et al., eds., Critical Approaches to International Criminal Law. New York: Routledge, 17–54.
Mégret, F., 2018. International Criminal Justice as a Peace Project. European Journal of International Law [online], 29(3), 835–858. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy057 [Accessed 10 March 2021].
Minkkinen, P., 2013. Critical Legal “Method” as Attitude. In: D. Watkins and M. Burton, eds., Research Methods in Law. Abingdon: Routledge, 119–138.
Morales,A., 2021. The Rocky Road to Peace: Current Challenges at the Special Jurisdiction for Peace in Colombia. EJIL: Talk! [online], 3 May. Available from: https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-rocky-road-to-peace-current-challenges-at-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-in-colombia/ [Accessed 14 February 2022].
Nersessian, D., 2010. Genocide and Political Groups. Oxford University Press.
Orford, A., and Hoffmann, F., 2016. Introduction: Theorizing International Law. In: A. Orford and F. Hoffmann, eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law. Oxford University Press, 1–17.
Purvis, N., 1991. Critical Legal Studies in Public International Law. Harvard International Law Journal, 32(1), 81–127.
Reus-Smit, C., 2014. International Law. In: J. Baylis, S. Smith and P. Owens, eds., The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Oxford University Press, 274–288.
Richani, N., 2002. Systems of Violence: The Political Economy of War and Peace in Colombia. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Rieff, D., 2016. In Praise of Forgetting: Historical Memory and its Ironies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rodríguez, J., 2019. JEP responde al Gobierno tras solicitud de cancelar audiencia ante la CIDH. RCN Radio [online], 5 May. Available from: https://www.rcnradio.com/colombia/jep-responde-al-gobierno-tras-solicitud-de-cancelar-audiencia-ante-la-cidh [Accessed 10 March 2021].
Rorty, R., 1989. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ross, A., 2018. Beyond Empathy and Compassion: Genocide and the Emotional Complexities of Humanitarian Politics. In: T. Brudholm and J. Lang, eds., Emotions and Mass Atrocity. Cambridge University Press, 185–208.
Rotberg, R., and Thompson, D., eds., 2000. Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Scarry, E., 1985. The Body in Pain. Oxford University Press.
Sikkink, K., 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Sikkink, K., and Booth Walling, C., 2007. The Impact of Human Rights Trials in Latin America. Journal of Peace Research, 44(4), 427–445.
Slovic, P., 2007. “If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic Numbing and Genocide. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(2), 79–95.
Stokes, D., 2005. America’s Other War: Terrorizing Colombia. London: Zed Books.
Strandberg Hassellind, F., 2020. The International Criminal Trial as a Site for Contesting Historical and Political Narratives: The Case of Dominic Ongwen. Social & Legal Studies [online], 30(5), 790–809. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0964663920971836 [Accessed 10 March 2021].
Strandberg Hassellind, F., and Baaz, M., 2020. Just Another Battleground: Resisting Courtroom Historiography in the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Journal of Political Power [online], 13(2), 252–267. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2020.1764806 [Accessed 10 March 2021].
Symmes Cobb, J., and Casey, N., 2016. Colombia Peace Deal Is Defeated, Leaving a Nation in Shock. The New York Times [online], 2 October. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/03/world/colombia-peace-deal-defeat.html [Accessed 10 March 2021].
Tallgren, I., 2002. The Sensibility and Sense of International Criminal Law. European Journal of International Law, 13(3), 561–595.
Teitel, R., 2003. Transitional Justice. Oxford University Press.
UN Affairs, 2019. At UN, Colombia’s Duque stands behind peace process, vows to stamp out narco-terrorists. UN News [online], 25 September. Available from: https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/09/1047582 [Accessed 10 March 2021].
United Nations, 2005. Organization of the Work of the Session: Report of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Situation of Human Rights in Colombia. (E/CN.4/2005/10) [online]. 28 February. Geneva: UN. Available from: https://www.hchr.org.co/documentoseinformes/informes/altocomisionado/Informe2004_eng.pdf [Accessed 10 March 2021].
Valencia, E.M., 2007. Theories of Compliance in International Conflict: The Place of the Third Geneva Convention in the Colombian Armed Conflict. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, 21(2), 445–476.
Valiñas, M., 2020. The Colombian Special Jurisdiction for Peace: A Few Issues for Consideration When Investigating and Adjudicating Sexual and Gender-based Crimes. Journal of International Criminal Justice [online], 18(2), 449–467. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqaa022 [Accessed 10 March 2021].
Vargas Trujillo, J., 2020. Participación colectiva de víctimas ante la jurisdicción especial para la paz (JEP). Vniversitas [online], 69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.vj69.pcvj [Accessed 17 December 2021].
Von der Groeben, C., 2011. The Conflict in Colombia and the Relationship Between Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law in Practice: Analysis of the New Operational Law of the Colombian Armed Forces. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 16(1), 141–164.
Weinstein, J., 2007. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. Cambridge University Press.
Wickham-Crowley, T., 1992. Guerrillas and Revolution in Latin America: A Comparative Study of Insurgents and Regimes Since 1956. Princeton University Press.
Wilson, R., 2011. Writing History in International Criminal Trials. Cambridge University Press.
Zolkos, M. 2008. The Time That Was Broken, the Home That Was Razed: Deconstructing Slavenka Drakulic’s Storytelling About Yugoslav War Crimes. International Journal of Transitional Justice [online], 2(2), 214–226. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijn006 [Accessed 9 February 2022].
Zunino, M., 2019. Justice Framed: A Genealogy of Transitional Justice. Cambridge University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Filip Strandberg Hassellind
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
