A relational analysis of enterprise obligations and carbon majors for climate justice
Keywords:
Climate justice, relational theory, business and human rights, carbon majors, international human rights law, Justicia climática, teoría relacional, derechos empresariales y humanos, principales empresas responsables de emisiones de carbonoAbstract
A coherent theory of climate justice must answer the question of “who owes what to whom, and why?” This paper considers the human rights responsibilities of business enterprises for climate injustice. I first introduce a relational approach to legal analysis, drawing upon the work of diverse theorists who confront the dominant yet unacknowledged prevalence of the bounded autonomous individual of liberal thought in diverse areas of law and policy, and offer a method for reinterpretation and transformation of law in the Anthropocene. I then examine the 2018 Principles on Climate Obligations of Enterprises, drafted by a sub-group of the legal experts responsible for the 2015 Oslo Principles. Ultimately, I argue that a coherent theory of justice in the Anthropocene is dependent upon relational insights which enable us to tell old stories in new ways, and so reveal the interconnectedness and interdependence of all beings, while accounting for power and difference.Una teoría coherente sobre justicia climática debe responder la pregunta de “¿Quién debe qué a quién, y por qué?” Este artículo trata sobre las responsabilidades que tienen las empresas sobre derechos humanos por injusticia climática. Primero, se presenta un enfoque relacional sobre el análisis jurídico, basándonos en el trabajo de diversos teóricos que se enfrentan a la prevalencia dominante –aunque no reconocida– del individuo autónomo pero limitado del pensamiento liberal en varias áreas de derecho y políticas, y se propone un método de reinterpretación y transformación del derecho en el Antropoceno. Después, examinamos los Principios sobre Obligaciones de las Empresas respecto al Cambio Climático, bosquejadas en 2018 por un subgrupo de los expertos juristas responsables de los Principios de Oslo de 2015. Finalmente, se aduce que una teoría coherente de la justicia en el Antropoceno depende de visiones relacionales que nos permitan relatar viejas historias de formas nuevas, y revelar así la interconectividad e interdependencia de todos los seres, al tiempo que se explican así el poder y la diferencia.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1139
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Sara L. Seck

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.