Feminist Judgments

Comparative Socio-Legal Perspectives on Judicial Decision Making and Gender Justice

Authors

  • Linda L. Berger University of Nevada Las Vegas
  • Bridget J. Crawford Pace University
  • Kathryn M. Stanchi Temple University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0999

Keywords:

Feminist judgments, feminist methodology, jurisprudence, judging

Abstract

This collection of essays is the product of the workshop Feminist Judgments: Comparative Socio-Legal Perspectives on Judicial Decision Making and Gender Justice held at the International Institute for the Sociology of Law (Oñati, Spain) in May, 2017. The papers explain and explore the multiple global projects that attempt to rewrite judicial opinions by incorporating feminist legal reasoning or methods. Each essay grows out of the authors’ experiences working with projects based in a particular socio-political, geographical, historical and jurisprudential context: Canada, England, Australia, Ireland, New Zealand, Scotland, and a multi-jurisdictional international law project. Collectively, the essays bring new insights, methods and challenges to the study of the feminist project of equal justice across the boundaries of culture, race, nation and gender.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

        Metrics

Views 601
Downloads:
PDF 991


References

Douglas, H., et al., eds., 2014. Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Oxford: Hart. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474201292

Enright, M., McCandless, J., and O’Donoghue, A., eds., 2017. Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Hart.

Hunter, R., McGlynn, C., and Rackley, E., eds., 2010. Feminist Judgments: from Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart.

Majury, D., 2006. Introducing the Women’s Court of Canada. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law [online], 18 (1), 1-26. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/230237 [Accessed 14 May 2018].

McDonald, E., et al., eds., 2017. Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand – Te Rino: a Two-Stranded Rope. Oxford: Hart. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509909766

Stanchi, K., Berger, L., and Crawford, B., eds., 2016. Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316411254

Downloads

Published

31-12-2018

How to Cite

Berger, L. L., Crawford, B. J. and Stanchi, K. M. (2018) “Feminist Judgments: Comparative Socio-Legal Perspectives on Judicial Decision Making and Gender Justice”, Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 8(9), pp. 1215–1223. doi: 10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0999.