What’s yours is mine and what’s mine is mine?
Re-thinking intellectual property and research ethics from the experience of the Purhépecha community of Cherán
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1102Keywords:
Indigenous peoples, research ethics, intellectual property, autonomy, oral historyAbstract
Intellectual property and cultural policy are essential to the practice of cultural rights, however, in both legal frameworks, indigenous peoples have often found that the state has little consideration for their voices and their world views. In contrast, though no more representative of indigenous perspectives, the social sciences, while engaging with indigenous voices, have often treated them as a source to be appropriated with disregard of their rights and agency. Through an activist and collaborative methodology that includes the concerns of a wide group of indigenous and non-indigenous persons, this article explores how the oral history project of the Fogata Kejtsitani in the Purhépecha community of Cherán, México, contributes to discussions on the appropriation and dissemination of culture. This community has managed the recognition of their right to autonomy, and in so doing, has founded a continuous process of law creation, on which Kejtsitani takes part.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF 397
References
Antons, C., 2009. The international debate about traditional knowledge and approaches in the Asia-Pacific Region. In: C. Antons, ed., Traditional Knowledge, Traditional Cultural Expressions and Intellectual Property in the Asia-Pacific Region: The International Debate about Traditional Knowledge and Approaches in the Asia-Pacific Region. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, pp. 39-65.
Aragón, O., 2013. El derecho en insurrección. El uso contra-hegemónico del derecho en el movimiento purépecha de Cherán. Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre as Américas, 7 (2), pp. 37-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21057/repam.v7i2.10034
Aragón, O., 2015. El Derecho después de la Insurrección. Cherán y el Uso Contra-Hegemónico del Derecho en la Suprema Corte de Justicia de México. Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies [online], 7 (2), pp. 71-87. Available from: http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/sortuz/article/view/702 [Accessed 12 February 2019].
Aragón, O., 2017. Transformando el constitucionalismo transformador: lecciones desde la experiencia político-jurídica de Cherán, México. Abya Yala, 1 (2), pp. 130-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26512/abyayala.v1i2.7018
Aragón, O., 2018. Otro derecho es posible. Una biografía (intelectual y militante) del Colectivo Emancipaciones. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 8 (5), pp. 703-721. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=3215147 [Accessed 12 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0963
Bárcena, E., 2013. El arte de lo imposible en la era de la democracia liberal. Consideraciones respecto al movimiento de la Comunidad Indígena de San Francisco Cherán como acto político. Morelia: Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo.
Calveiro, P., 2014. Repensar y ampliar la democracia. El caso del Municipio Autónomo de Cherán K’eri. Argumentos [online], 272 (1), pp. 193-212. Available from: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=59533233009 [Accessed 12 February 2019].
Cooper, E., 2015. Copyright and Mass Social Authorship A Case Study of the Making of the Oxford English Dictionary. Social & Legal Studies [online], 24 (4), pp. 509-530. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0964663914565848 [Accessed 12 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663914565848
Craig, C.J., Turcotte, J.F., and Coombe, R.J., 2011. What’s feminist about open access? A relational approach to copyright in the academy. Feminist@law [online], 1 (1), pp. 1-35. Available from: http://journals.kent.ac.uk/index.php/feministsatlaw/article/view/7 [Accessed 12 February 2019].
Criales, L., and Condoreno, C., 2016. Breve reseña del taller de historia oral andina (THOA). Fuentes [online], 10 (43), pp. 57-66. Available from: http://www.revistasbolivianas.org.bo/pdf/fdc/v10n43/v10n43_a12.pdf [Accessed 12 February 2019].
Dommann, M., 2008. Lost in tradition? Reconsidering the history of folklore and its legal protection since 1800. In: C.B. Graber and M. Burri-Nenova, eds., Intellectual Property And Traditional Cultural Expressions In A Digital Environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 3-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848443914.00007
Drahos, P., 1996. A Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 13–39.
Esteva, G., 2015. Para sentipensar la comunalidad. Bajo el Volcán [online], 15 (23), pp. 171-186. Available from: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/286/28643473010.pdf [Accessed 12 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32399/ICSYH.bvbuap.2954-4300.2015.16.23.589
Fitzpatrick, P., 1998. La mitología del derecho moderno. Ciudad de México: Siglo XXI.
Fitzpatrick, P., 2011. El derecho como resistencia: modernismo, imperialismo, legalismo. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre / Universidad Libre.
Flores, B.G., 2016. Nos robaron a la novia: agravio y conflicto a raíz de la patrimonialización de la pirekua por la unesco. Sociológica [online], 31 (87), pp. 175-206. Available from: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=305043762006 [Accessed 12 February 2019].
Graber, C.B., and Burri-Nenova, M., 2008. Intellectual Property And Traditional Cultural Expressions In A Digital Environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. xi–xiii. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848443914
Hagene, T., 2015. The Role and Style of Meetings in a Native Village in Mexico City: A Contribution towards the Analysis of Meetings. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies [online], no. 99, pp. 89-112. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18352/erlacs.10102 [Accessed 12 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/erlacs.10102
Hale, C.R., 2006. Activist Research v. Cultural Critique: Indigenous Land Rights and the Contradictions of Politically Engaged Anthropology. Cultural Anthropology [online], 21 (1), pp. 96-120. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1525/can.2006.21.1.96 [Accessed 12 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2006.21.1.96
Hale, C.R., 2008. Introduction. In: C.R. Hale, ed., Engaging Contradictions: Theory, Politics, and Methods of Activist Scholarship. Berkeley: University of California, pp. 1-28. Available from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/42316/ [Accessed 12 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520916173-004
Hale, C.R., and Stephen, L., eds., 2013. Otros saberes: Collaborative Research on Indigenous and Afro-Descendant Cultural Politics. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.
Hernández Castillo, A., 2016. Multiple InJustices: Indigenous Women, Law and Political Struggle in Latin America. Tucson: University of Arizona.
Ibarra, L., 2010. Autores Indígenas en México. Sortuz: Oñati Journal of Emergent Sociolegal Studies [online], 4 (2), pp. 24–38. Available from: http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/sortuz/article/view/586 [Accessed 12 February 2019].
Ibarra, L., 2018. América Latina y la mirada socio-jurídica del Instituto Internacional de Sociología Jurídica de Oñati (IISJ). Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 8 (5), pp. 586-615. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=3124993 [Accessed 12 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0967
Ibarra, L., et al., forthcoming 2019. Community Administration as Cultural Policy: Empowering citizens in Eltzia. Oñati Socio-legal Series [online], vol. 9 (this issue). Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3332446
INAREMAC, 1985. 10 años de labores del INAREMAC: sus instrumentos de desarrollo alternativo. San Cristóbal: INAREMAC.
Jerónimo, J., 2017. La disputa por el derecho a la diferencia. In: F. Martínez et al., eds., Cherán K’eri: 5 años de autonomía [online]. Concejo Mayor de Gobierno Comunal de Cherán, pp. 135-141. Available from: http://www.ceaal.org/v2/archivos/publicaciones/booksaf/Cheran5anivAutonomia.pdf [Accessed 12 February 2019].
Kongolo, T., 2008. Unsettled International Intellectual Property Issues. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
Kur, A., and Knaak, R., 2004. Protection of traditional names and designations. In: S. von Lewinski, ed., Indigenous Heritage and Intellectual Property: Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, pp. 221-258.
Lemus, A., and Keyser, U., 2017. Introducción. In: C. Leco, A. Lemus and U. Keyser, eds., Juchari eratsikua, Cherán keri: retrospectiva histórica, territorio e identidad étnica. Concejo Mayor de Gobierno Comunal de Cherán, pp. 17-25.
Leyva, X., and Speed, S., 2008. Hacia la investigación descolonizada: Nuestra experiencia de co-labor. In: X. Leyva, A. Burguete and S. Speed, eds., Gobernar (en) la diversidad: experiencias indígenas desde América Latina: hacia la investigación de co-labor [online]. Ciudad de México: CIESAS / FLACSO Ecuador / FLACSO Guatemala, pp. 34-59. Available from: http://www.flacsoandes.edu.ec/libros/112133-opac [Accessed 12 February 2019].
Lucas-Schloetter, A., 2004. Folklore. In: S. von Lewinski, ed., Indigenous Heritage and Intellectual Property: Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, pp. 259-377.
Maldonado, B., 2015. Perspectivas de la comunalidad en los pueblos indígenas de Oaxaca. Bajo el Volcán [online], 15 (23), pp. 151-169. Available from: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=28643473009 [Accessed 12 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32399/ICSYH.bvbuap.2954-4300.2015.16.23.588
Martínez Luna, J., 2015. Conocimiento y comunalidad. Bajo el Volcán [online], 15 (23), pp. 99-112. Available from: http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/286/28643473006.pdf [Accessed 12 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32399/ICSYH.bvbuap.2954-4300.2015.16.23.574
Martínez Navarrete, E., 2017. ¡Bosque para quien lo trabaje! Relaciones de producción e identidad política en los procesos de autonomía indígena. El caso de Cheran K’eri. Ciudad de México: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social (CIESAS).
Matsui, K., 2015. Introduction to the Future of Traditional Knowledge Research. International Indigenous Policy Journal [online], 6 (2). Available from: http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/iipj/vol6/iss2/1/ [Accessed 12 February 2019]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2015.6.2.1
Nader, L., 1990. Harmony Ideology: Justice and Control in a Zapotec Mountain Village. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621831
Picciotto, S., and Campbell, D., 2003. Whose molecule is it anyway? Private and social perspectives on intellectual property. In: A. Hudson, ed., New Perspectives on Property Law, Obligations and Restitution. London: Cavendish, pp. 279-303.
Rivera Cusicanqui, S., 2012. Experiencias de montaje creativo: de la historia oral a la imagen en movimiento ¿Quién escribe la historia? Chasqui Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación [online], nº. 120, pp. 14-18. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.16921/chasqui.v0i120.495 [Accessed 12 February 2019].
Rivera Cusicanqui, S., and Lehm Ardaya, Z., 1988. Lxs Artesanxs Libertarixs y la Ética del Trabajo. La Paz: THOA.
Rivera-Lugo, C., 2014. ¡Ni una vida más para el derecho! Reflexiones sobre la crisis actual de la forma jurídica. Aguascalientes: Centro de Estudios Jurídicos y Sociales Mispat / Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí.
Santillán, V.M., 2018. La sociedad de los comuneros: procesos políticos y relaciones de poder en Cherán, Michoacán. Ciudad de México: El Colegio de México.
Silva, E., 2017. Uso y costumbre*-cultura en palabra propia de Cherán K’eri. In: C. Leco, A. Lemus and U. Keyser, eds., Juchari eratsikua, Cherán keri: retrospectiva histórica, territorio e identidad étnica. Concejo Mayor de Gobierno Comunal de Cherán, pp. 31-43.
South African San Institute, 2017. San Code of Research Ethics [online]. Northern Cape. Available from: http://trust-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/San-Code-of-RESEARCH-Ethics-Booklet-final.pdf [Accessed 12 February 2019].
Speed, S., 2006. Entre la antropología y los derechos humanos: hacia una investigación activista y comprometida críticamente. Alteridades [online], 16 (31), pp. 73-85. Available from: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/747/74703107.pdf [Accessed 12 February 2019].
Teubner, G., and Fischer-Lescano, A., 2008. Cannibalizing epistemes: will modern law protect traditional cultural expressions. In: C.B. Graber and M. Burri-Nenova, eds., Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions in a Digital Environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 17-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848443914.00008
Tobin, B., 2009. The role of customary law and practice in the protection of traditional knowledge related to biological diversity. In: C. Antons, ed., Traditional Knowledge, Traditional Cultural Expressions and Intellectual Property in the Asia-Pacific Region: the International Debate about Traditional Knowledge and Approaches in the Asia-Pacific Region. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, pp. 127-156.
Torres, Y., 2017. Participación del Concejo de Jóvenes. In: F. Martínez et al., eds., Cherán K’eri: 5 años de autonomía. Concejo Mayor de Gobierno Comunal de Cherán, pp. 121-123.
Velázquez, V.A., 2013. Reconstitución del territorio comunal: el movimiento étnico autonómico en San Francisco Cherán, Michoacán [online]. Tesis de Maestría en Antropología Social. Ciudad de México: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social. Available from: http://repositorio.ciesas.edu.mx//handle/123456789/230 [Accessed 12 February 2019].
Walsh, C., 2009. Interculturalidad, Estado, sociedad: luchas (de)coloniales de nuestra época. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar / Abya-Yala.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Lucero Ibarra Rojas, Ezequiel Escobedo Osorio, Fogata Kejtsitani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
