Disputas sobre la regulación jurídica del aborto en Argentina. La abogacía feminista frente a resistencias conservadoras en el proceso judicial T.S. (2000): ecografía, visualización fetal y producción del discurso jurídico (Feminist disputes over...)
Keywords:
Aborto, poder del derecho, abogacía feminista, conservadurismo, estudios socio-legales feministas, Abortion, the power of law, feminist lawyering, conservatism, feminist socio-legal studiesAbstract
Desde un enfoque socio-jurídico feminista, en este trabajo de investigación indago en el proceso judicial T.S. asumiendo que constituye un sitio institucionalizado de disputas sobre la configuración discursiva del aborto. T.S. involucró a Silvia, una mujer con un diagnóstico de embarazo de un feto anencefálico quien, ante la negativa de los profesionales médicos a realizarle la interrupción del embarazo en el sistema de salud y la solicitud de una orden judicial, inició un proceso judicial de amparo en los tribunales de la ciudad de Buenos Aires con el patrocinio de las abogadas de la fundación Unos con Otros en el año 2000. El proceso judicial fue resuelto por la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación en el año 2001. A partir del análisis del discurso de documentos del proceso judicial y entrevistas en profundidad estudio cómo se configuró discursivamente el aborto en este proceso judicial.
From a feminist socio-juridical approach, in this research work I investigate the judicial process T.S. assuming that it constitutes an institutionalized site of disputes over the discursive configuration of abortion. T.S. involved Silvia, a woman with a pregnancy diagnosis of an anencephalic fetus who, faced with the refusal of the medical professionals to perform the interruption of the pregnancy in the health system and the request for a court order, initiated a judicial process of amparo in the courts of the city of Buenos Aires with the sponsorship of the lawyers of the foundation Unos con Otros in the year 2000. The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation ruled the judicial process T.S. in the year 2001. From the discourse analysis of the documents of the judicial process and of in-depth interviews I study how abortion was discursively configured in this judicial process.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0962
Downloads
Downloads:
PDF 131
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.