Re-examining Burial Disputes in Kenyan Courts through the Lenses of Legal Pluralism.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0982Keywords:
Legal pluralism, customary law, burial disputes, legal proximity, Pluralismo jurídico, derecho consuetudinario, disputas por enterramiento, proximidad jurídicaAbstract
This paper starts by exploring the place of customary law in socio-legal studies. It examines the different criticisms levelled against customary law and argues that although customary law is considered not to have the features of formal legal systems, the said comparison is unjustified as customary law and formal state law originate from different foundations. The second part of this paper highlights the contemporary theoretical discourse on legal pluralism. It responds to scholarly criticism of legal pluralism and traces the historical development of the concept. Using landmark burial disputes in Kenya, the paper examines the use of customary law in Kenyan courts. It identifies the inconsistencies and absurdities that result from the use of common law principles in the resolution of customary law disputes and advocates for the government to embrace non-state justice systems in resolving burial disputes.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF 1449
References
Abdullahi, A.M., 1999. Burial Disputes in Modern Kenya: Customary Law in a Judicial Conundrum. University of Nairobi Press.
An-Na’im, A.A., 1992. Towards a Cross Cultural Approach to Defining International Standards of Human Rights: The Meaning of Cruel and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. In: A.A. An-Na’im, ed., Human Rights in Cross Cultural Perspectives: a Quest for Consensus. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
An-Na’im, A.A., 2010. The Compatibility Dialectic: Mediating the Legitimate Coexistence of Islamic Law and State Law. Modern Law Review, 73 (1), 1-29.
Bennett, T.W., 1991. A sourcebook of African customary law for Southern Africa. Cape Town: Juta.
Bennett, T.W., 2009. Re-Introducing African Customary Law to the South African Legal System. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 57 (1), 1-31.
Bennett, T.W., 2011. Ubuntu: An African Equity. Potchefstroom Electronic Journal [online], (14) 4, 30-61. Available from: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/pelj/article/download/68745/56815 [Accessed 19 April 2018].
Brennan, M., 2008. Mourning and Disaster: Finding Meaning in the Mourning for Hillsborough and Diana. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Chanock, M., 1989. Neither Customary nor Legal: African Customary Law in an Era of Family Law Reform. International Journal of Law and the Family, 3, 72-88.
Chopra, T., and Isser, D., 2011. Women’s Access to Justice, Legal Pluralism and Fragile States. In: P. Albrecht et al., eds., Perspectives on Involving Non-State and Customary Actors in Justice and Security Reform [online]. Rome: International Development Law Organization in conjunction with the Danish Institute for International Studies. Available from: http://pure.diis.dk/ws/files/61420/DIIS_Book.pdf [Accessed 9 April 2018].
Cotran, E., and Rubin, N.N., eds., 1970. Readings in African law. London: F. Cass.
Davies, J.A., and Dagbanja, D.N., 2009. The Role and Future of Customary Tort Law in Ghana: a Cross-Cultural Perspective. Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law [online], 26 (2), 303-333. Available from: http://arizonajournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/DaviesDagbanja.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2018].
De Mot, J.P.B., and Parisi, F., 2014. Customary Law. In: M.T. Gibbons, ed., The Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 792–793.
Ehrlich, E., and Isaacs, N., 1922. The sociology of law. Harvard Law Review, 36 (2), 130-145.
Ellickson, R.C., 2005. Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fuller, L.L., 1964. The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT / London: Yale University Press.
Fuller, L.L., 1969. Human Interaction and the Law. The American Journal of Jurisprudence [online], 14 (1), 1-36. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ajj/article-pdf/14/1/1/7289948/ajj-14-1.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Griffiths, J., 1986. What is Legal Pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18 (24), 1-55.
Gunga, S.O., 2009. The politics of Widowhood and Re-Marriage among the Luo of Kenya. Thought and Practice: a Journal of the Philosophical Association of Kenya [online], 1 (1), 165-178. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fafb/6ab796944718e1d7c653e239ded2ce9b44a0.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Gyekye, K., 1996. African Cultural Values: An Introduction. Lansing, MI: Sankofa.
Hart, H.L.A., 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Jackson, S.A., 2006. Legal Pluralism between Islam and the Nation-State: Romantic Medievalism or Pragmatic Modernity? Fordham International Law Journal [online], 30 (1), 158-176. Available from: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj/vol30/iss1/5 [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Jaja, J.M., 2013. The Dead in the Lives of the Living: A Socio-Cultural Survey of Burial Sites in the Niger Delta. Global Journal of Human-Social Science Research [online], 13 (3). Available from: https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/907/0 on 5/8/2017 [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Jupp, P.G., and Gittings, C., eds., 2000. Death in England: an Illustrated History. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Kamau, W., 2009. Law, Pluralism and the Family in Kenya: Beyond Bifurcation of Formal Law and Custom. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family [online], 23 (2), 133-144. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1401797 [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Kamau, W., 2015. Judicial Approaches to the Applicability of Customary Law to Succession Disputes in in Kenya. East African Law Journal, 1 (1), 140-164.
Kariuki, F., 2015a. Community, Customary and Informal Justice Systems in Kenya: Reflecting on and Exploring the Appropriate Terminology [online]. Nairobi: Strathmore University Dispute Resolution Centre. Available from: http://www.strathmore.edu/sdrc/uploads/documents/books-and-articles/Paper%20on%20Traditional%20justice%20terminology.pdf [Accessed 18 April 2018]
Kariuki, F., 2015b. Conflict Resolution by Elders in Africa: Successes, Challenges and Opportunities. Alternative Dispute Resolution, 3 (2), 30-53.
Kariuki, M., 2015. Empowering Kenyan People through Alternative Dispute Resolution. Alternative Dispute Resolution, 3 (2), 64-108.
Kariuki, M., and Kariuki, F., 2015. ADR, Access to Justice and Development in Kenya. Strathmore University Law Journal [online], 1 (1), 1-25. Available from: http://www.strathmore.edu/sdrc/uploads/documents/books-and-articles/ADR%20access%20to%20justice%20and%20development%20in%20Kenya.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Kuzenski, W., 1924. Property in Dead Bodies. Marquette Law Review [online], 9 (1), 17-24. Available from: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol9/iss1/3 [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Lagoutte, S., ed., 2014. Dissolution of Marriage, Legal Pluralism and women’s rights in Francophone West Africa [online]. Bamako / Dakar / Niamey / Copenhagen: Danish Institute of Human Rights. Available from: https://www.humanrights.dk/files/media/billeder/nyheder/engelsk_version.pdf. [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Letsas, G., 2012. Harmonic Law: The Case against Pluralism. In: J. Dickson and P. Eleftheriadis, eds., Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law. Oxford University Press.
Levi, E.H., 1948. An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. University of Chicago Law Review [online], 15 (3), 501-574. Available from: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.es/&httpsredir=1&article=5687&context=journal_articles [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Mamdani, M., 1996. Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. 1st ed. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Mbiti, J.S., 1990. Introduction to African Religion and Philosophy. 1st ed. Oxford: Heinemann.
Mbote, P.K., 2002. Gender Dimensions of Law, Colonialism and Inheritance in East Africa: Kenya Women’s Experience [online]. Originally published in Verfassung und Recht in Übersee, 35/3. Republished by International Environmental Law Research Centre, Geneva. Available from: http://www.ielrc.org/content/a0205.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Michaels, R., 2005. The Re-state-ment of Non-State Law: The State, Choice of Law and the Challenge from Global Legal Pluralism. Wayne Law Review [online], 51, 1210-1254. Available from: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/1226/ [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Moore, S.F., 1973. Law and Social Change: the Semi-autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study. Law and Society Review [online], 719-746. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3052967 [Accessed 18 April 2018].
Musembi, C.N., 2003. Review of Experience in Engaging with ‘Non-state’ Justice Systems in East Africa [online]. Institute of Development Studies, Sussex University. DFID funded research paper, 23. Published by: Governance and Social Development Resource Centre. Available from: http://www.gsdrc.org/docs/open/ds37.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Mwendwa Malelu, J., 2017. The Need for Disposal of Dead Body Legislation in Kenya. Kenya Law Reform Commission Blog [online], 19 February. Available from: http://www.klrc.go.ke/index.php/klrc-blog/511-concept-paper-on-need-for-disposal-of-dead-body-legislation-in-kenya?showall=1 [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Mwimali, B.J., 2015. Human Rights Perspective of Informal Dispute Resolution Processes and the Criminal Justice System in Kenya. Law Society of Kenya Journal, 2 (2) 1-11.
Ndulo, M., 2011. African Customary Law, Customs and Women’s Rights. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies [online], 18 (1), 87-120. Available from: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijgls/vol18/iss1/5 [Accessed 18 April 2018].
Nelken, D., 2008. Eugen Ehrlich, Living Law, and Plural Legalities. Theoretical Inquiries in Law [online], 9 (2), 444-469. Available from: https://www7.tau.ac.il/ojs/index.php/til/article/download/691/650 [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Ngare, S.N., 2006. Burial Disputes in Kenya: A case for Legislation. Thesis for the Master’s of Laws Degree. University of Nairobi Research Archive.
Nwabueze, R.N., 2008. Legal Approaches to the Burial Rights of a Surviving Wife. Amicus Curiae [online], 73, 12-15. Available from: http://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/1722/1/Amicus_Curiae_2008_Issue_73%2C_12-15.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Nyamu, C.I., 2000 .Achieving Gender Equality in Plural Legal Context: Customs and Women’s Access to Control of Land in Kenya. Third World Legal Studies [online], 15 (1), 21-63. Available from: http://scholar.valpo.edu/twls/vol15/iss1/3 [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Ojwang, D., 2015. Dismantling Jurist Stereotypes towards the Traditional Justice Systems: Can Something Good come from Article 159 (2) (C) of the Constitution? Alternative Dispute Resolution, 3 (2), 192-204.
Onyango, P., 2013. African Customary Law: An Introduction. Nairobi: Law Africa.
Oomen, B., 2014. The application of socio-legal theories of legal pluralism to understanding the implementation and integration of human rights law European Journal of Human Rights [online], 4, 471-495. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2919353 [Accessed 19 April 2018].
Pavone, T., 2014. A Critical Adjudication of the Fuller-Hart Debate [online]. Available from: https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/tpavone/files/fuller-hart_debate_critical_review.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Pimentel, D., 2010. Legal Pluralism in Post-Colonial Africa: Linking Statutory and Customary Adjudication in Mozambique. Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal [online], 14 (1), Article 2, 59-102. Available from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5f99/6354ded978218afbeecb2367c2476962b58a.pdf [Accessed 18 April 2018].
Scharffs, B.G., 2004. The Character of Legal Reasoning. Washington and Lee Law Review [online], 61, 733-786. Available from: http://law2.wlu.edu/deptimages/Law%20Review/61-2Scharffs.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Tamanaha, B.Z., 2008. Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global. Sydney Law Review [online], 30 (3), 375-411. Available from: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/SydLRev/2008/20.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Ubink, J., 2011. Stating the Customary: an Innovative Approach to the Locally Legitimate Recording of Customary Law in Namibia. In: J. Ubink and T. McInerney, eds., Customary Justice: Perspectives on Legal Empowerment [online]. Rome: IDLO. Available from: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/142874/CustomaryJustice3.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Ubink, J., and van Rooij, B., 2011. Towards Customary Legal Empowerment: an Introduction. In: J. Ubink and T. McInerney, eds., Customary Justice: Perspectives on Legal Empowerment [online]. Rome: IDLO. Available from: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/142874/CustomaryJustice3.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Waldron, J., 2008. No Barking: Legal Pluralism and the Contrast between Hart’s Jurisprudence and Fuller’s [online]. For the colloquium: The Hart-Fuller Debate 50 Years On. Acton: Australian National University College of Law, 17-19 December. Available from: https://law.anu.edu.au/sites/all/files/waldron.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Woodman, G.R., 1996. Legal pluralism and the search for justice: studying people's search for justice. Journal of African Law [online], 40 (2), 152-167. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-african-law/article/legal-pluralism-and-the-search-for-justice/0A20E0E04EFCA2611565297CF146C093 [Accessed 10 April 2018].
Young, M., and Cullen, L., 1996. A Good Death: Conversations with East Londoners. London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 David Otieno Ngira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
