Considering a different model for the Family and Children Courthouse Building
Reflections on the Portuguese experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0940Keywords:
Family law and justice, courthouse buildings, architecture, PortugalAbstract
Courthouse buildings do not usually play a significant role in most socio-legal research on law-and-courts; and where the courthouse buildings have been considered, authors often take for granted the need for a ritualized adjudicative process within a certain kind of building, usually a pompous and prominent one. My aim, nevertheless, is to discuss the law buildings, and their internal configuration, where the specialized jurisdiction of family and children justice is rendered, in Portugal. This article will thus consider the discrepancies between the courthouses in books and the courthouses in action, or how they are legally designed and concretely structured, and lived, by giving voice to court professionals (judges and prosecutors) and court users, pointing out the problems and needs they have identified, and the claims they make.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF 141
References
Anthony, T. and Grant, E., 2016. Courthouse Design Principles to Dignify Spaces for Indigenous Users: Preliminary Observations. International Journal for Court Administration [online], 8 (1), 43-59. Available from: https://www.iacajournal.org/articles/10.18352/ijca.217/galley/219/download/ [Accessed 7 February 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.217
Arrieta, V., 2014. Diversos escenarios judiciales y su impacto en la victimización secundaria. Eguzkilore [online], 28, 287-320. San Sebastian: UPV/EHU. Available from: https://www.ehu.eus/documents/1736829/3498354/17-veronica+arrieta+p.pdf [Accessed 18 January 2018].
Asma, D., 1997. Genuflecting at the bench: rituals of power and power of rituals in American courts. Critical criminology [online], v. 5. Available from: http://www.critcrim.org/redfeather/journal-pomocrim/Vol-5-Dramaturgy/genuflecting%20at%20the%20bench.htm [Accessed 25 September 2017].
Branco, P., 2015. Os Tribunais como Espaços de Reconhecimento, de Funcionalidade e de Acesso à Justiça. Oporto: Vida Económica.
Branco, P., 2016. Courthouses as Spaces of Recognition, Functionality and Access to Law and Justice: A Portuguese Reflection. Oñati Socio-legal Series [online], 6 (3), 426-441. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2812699 [Accessed 8 February 2018].
Branco, P.et al., 2011. Entre a forma e a função: arquitectura judiciária e acesso ao direito e à justiça nos tribunais com competência em família e menores. Lex Familiae, 15, 33-56.
Brigham, J., 2009. Material Law: A Jurisprudence of What’s Real. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Brownlee, D.B., 1984. The Law Courts: The Architecture of George Edmund Street. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Bybee, K.J., 2012. Judging in Place: Architecture, Design, and the Operation of Courts. Law & Social Inquiry [online] 37 (4), 1014-1028. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01327.x [Accessed 8 February 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01327.x
Carmo, R., 2014. A Nova Organização do Sistema Judiciário e a Jurisdição de Família e Menores. Revista do Ministério Público, 140, 9-32.
Chase, O.G. and Thong, J., 2012. Judging Judges: The Effect of Courtroom Ceremony on Participant Evaluation of Process Fairness-Related Factors. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities [online], 24 (1), 221-245. Available from: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjlh/vol24/iss1/10 [Accessed 8 February 2018].
Clark, J., 2009. Reflection. Justice. Architecture Australia [online], 98 (5), September. Available from: https://architectureau.com/articles/reflection-8/ [Accessed 7 February 2018].
Commaille, J., 2013. O espaço da justiça como questão política entre necessidades e desafios – uma abordagem de sociologia política do direito. In: P. Branco, ed., Sociologia do(s) Espaço(s) da Justiça: Diálogos Interdisciplinares. Coimbra, Portugal: CES / Almedina, 21-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8235.v108i0p929-933
Correia, T., 2016. (Exclusivo) Beja: Novo Palácio da Justiça vai começar a ser construído no segundo trimestre de 2017. Lidador notícias [online], 16 May. Available from: http://www.lidadornoticias.pt/exclusivo-beja-novo-palacio-da-justica-vai-comecar-a-ser-construido-no-segundo-trimestre-de-2017/ [Accessed 18 January 2018].
Council of Europe, 2010. Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on child-friendly justice. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice, 2014. Guidelines on the organization and accessibility of court premises [online]. Document adopted by the CEPEJ at its 24th Plenary Meeting. Strasbourg, 11-12 December. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/16807482cb [Accessed 18 January 2018].
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, 2015. Child-friendly justice – Perspectives and experiences of professionals on children’s participation in civil and criminal judicial proceedings in 10 EU Member States. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Fischer Taylor, K., 1993. In the Theatre of Criminal Justice: The Palais de Justice in Second Empire Paris. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Garapon, A., 1997. Bem julgar. Ensaio sobre o ritual judiciário. Lisbon: Instituto Piaget.
Garapon, A., 2013. Imaginer le Palais De Justice Du XXIe Siècle. Notes de L’IHEJ [online], 5, 1-22. Available from: http://ihej.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Antoine_Garapon_Palais_de_justice_NoteIHEJ5_062013.pdf [Accessed 18 January 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.gara.2013.01.0001
Gélinas, F. et al., 2015. Architecture, Rituals, and Norms in Civil Procedure. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice [online], 32 (2), 213-232. Available from: https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/WYAJ/article/download/4711/3975 [Accessed 8 February 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4711
Goltsman, S., 1992. Recognizing children and families in the design of a children’s court. Children’s Environments, 9 (1), 72-76.
Goodrich, P., 2008. Visive Powers: Colours, Trees and Genres of Jurisdiction. Law and Humanities [online], 2 (2), 213-231. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Peter_Goodrich3-YU/publication/263370239_Visive_Powers_Colours_Trees_and_Genres_of_Jurisdiction/links/58f49ee7aca27289c21c8c92/Visive-Powers-Colours-Trees-and-Genres-of-Jurisdiction.pdf [Accessed 8 February 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17521483.2008.11423752
Lucien, A., 2010. Staging and the Imaginary Institution of the Judge. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 23 (2), 185-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-010-9150-4
Marella, M.R. and Marini, G., 2014. Di cosa parliamo quando parliamo di famiglia. Le relazioni familiari nella globalizzazione del diritto. Rome / Bari: Laterza.
McNamara, M.J., 2004. From tavern to courthouse. Architecture & ritual in American Law, 1658-1860. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mulcahy, L., 2011. Legal Architecture. Justice, due process and the place of law. London / New York: Routledge.
Mulcahy, L., 2013. Back to the Future? The Challenge of the Past for Courthouses of Tomorrow. In: J. Simon, N. Temple and R. Tobe, eds. Architecture and Justice. Judicial Meanings in the Public Realm. Surrey: Ashgate, 71-83.
Ngwa-Suh, M., 2006. Facility Facelifts: How Courthouses Are Accommodating Children and Youth. Children’s Voice, 15 (1), 29-31.
Nunes, A.M., 2013. «Levante-se o Réu». Os Tribunais de Menores em Portugal entre 1911 e 1974. In: P. Branco, ed. Sociologia do(s) Espaço(s) da Justiça: Diálogos Interdisciplinares. Coimbra: CES / Almedina, 147-160.
Ordem dos Advogados, 2015. Um ano de novo "mapa judiciário". Boletim da Ordem dos Advogados [online], 130 (september), 6-21. Available from: https://portal.oa.pt/media/117987/n%C2%BA130-set2015.pdf [Accessed 18 January 2018].
Papke, D.R., 1999. The American Courtroom Trial: Pop Culture, Courthouse Realities, and the Dream World of Justice. South Texas Law Review, 40, 919 932.
Pedroso, J. et al., 2010. A(s) Justiça(s) da Família e das Crianças em Portugal no início do século XXI: uma nova relação entre o judicial e o não judicial. Lex Familiae, 13, 101-119.
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A., 2016. Flesh of the Law: Material Legal Metaphors, Journal of Law and Society, 43 (1), 45-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2016.00740.x
Pound, R., 1910. Law in Books and Law in Action. American Law Review, 44, 12-36.
Resnik, J. and Curtis, D., 2011. Representing Justice. Invention, Controversy, and Rights in City-States and Democratic Courtrooms. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rowden, E. and Jones, D., 2015. Design, Dignity and Due Process: The Construction of the Coffs Harbour Courthouse. Law, Culture and the Humanities, first published 15 November, 1-20.
Rowden, E., 2013. As instalações à distância para crianças e testemunhas vulneráveis: novas perspetivas a propósito de uma tipologia espacial emergente. In: P. Branco, ed. Sociologia do(s) Espaço(s) da Justiça: Diálogos Interdisciplinares. Coimbra: CES / Almedina, 161-184.
Rowden, E., 2015. Distributed Courts and Legitimacy: What do we Lose When we Lose the Courthouse? Law, Culture and the Humanities, first published November 5, 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872115612966
Scheppele, K.L., 2012. Judges as Architects. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities [online], 24 (1), 345-396. Available from: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1391&context=yjlh [Accessed 18 January 2018].
Serra, E., 1955. O novo direito criminal de menores. Princípios enformadores. Os tribunais de menores e a especialização da respectiva magistratura. Infância e Juventude, 3, 3-8.
Spaulding, N.W., 2012. The Enclosure of Justice. Courthouse Architecture, Due Process, and the Dead Metaphor of Trial. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities [online], 24 (1), 101 133. Available from: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1390&context=yjlh [Accessed 18 January 2018].
Tait, D. and Kennedy, L., 1999. Court perspectives: architecture, psychology and law reform in Western Australia. Western Australian Law Commission, 1017-1100.
Traldi, L., 2017. L’Olanda ha un non-problema. La Repubblica, 11 February.
Wardle, B., 2017. Legal Façades. Griffith Law Review [online], 25 (4), 525-551. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2016.1273080. [Accessed 18 January 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2016.1273080
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrícia Branco
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
