Posiciones en disputa frente a la regulación de las TRHA: El caso argentino (Positions in dispute against the regulation of ARTS: The Argentinian case)
Keywords:
Reproducción asistida, salud, conservadurismo, derechos, familia, Assisted Reproduction Techniques, health, conservatism, rights, familiesAbstract
Las Técnicas de Reproducción Humana Asistida (TRHA) constituyen innovaciones que, en el espacio social, dan cuenta de los procesos de gobernabilidad reproductiva, tensionando definiciones de reproducción, familia, parentesco y persona. En el caso argentino, estas definiciones, por su acceso, se dirimieron en gran medida en el escenario jurídico y legislativo. Tomando el debate legislativo argentino, este artículo analiza las argumentaciones de las posiciones a favor y de las oposiciones conservadoras a la hora de regular el acceso de la población a las TRHA. Mediante una metodología cualitativa, se realiza un análisis de contenido de documentos y versiones taquigráficas del debate legislativo por la regulación de las TRHA (2012-2013) en el Congreso de la Nación Argentina, retomando los principales ejes de debate: las nociones de sexualidad, de familia y de reproducción, así como las disputas sobre el estatus del embrión producto de estas técnicas.The Assisted Reproduction Techniques (ARTs) constitute innovations that in the social space account for the processes of reproductive governance, stressing definitions of reproduction, family, kinship, and person. In the Argentine case, these definitions for their access were primarily resolved in the legal and legislative scenarios. From the Argentine legislative debate, this article analyzes the arguments of positions in favor and conservative oppositions, when regulating the access of the population to the ARTs. Through a qualitative methodology, analysis of the content of documents, and shorthand versions of the legislative debate for the regulation of the ARTs (2012-2013) in the Argentine National Congress. This is carried out taking up the principal axes of discussion: the notions of sexuality, of family, reproduction as well as disputes about the status of the embryo product of these techniques.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1133
Downloads
Downloads:
PDF 236
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.