The Canadian Wheat Board, Socio-economic Vulnerability and the Neo-liberal State
Keywords:
Canadian Wheat Board, grain marketing, neo-liberalism, farmer vulnerability, Junta Canadiense del Cereal, mercado del cereal, neo-liberalismo, vulnerabilidad de los agricultoresAbstract
The Canadian Prairies is one of the world's largest breadbaskets. But its location in the centre of the country, far from world markets, increases farmers' vulnerability to the middle-men who ship, handle and market their grain. To protect them, the federal government set up the Canadian Wheat Board in 1935 and gave it monopoly marketing powers in 1943. However, these monopoly powers came increasingly under attack as a market-driven, neo-liberal agenda of free trade, small government, privatization and deregulation gained a hold in the 1980s in Canada, as elsewhere. In 2011, Canada's Conservative-led government adopted the controversial Marketing Freedom for Grain Farmers Act ending the Board's monopoly powers. This legislation is controversial not so much for what it does as for how it was done.
This paper explores the possible effects of this on Prairie grain farmers. It compares the functioning of an 'open' (or private) market with the CWB's 'controlled' market; it describes the neo-liberal challenges to the CWB's monopoly since the 1980s; and it questions the promise of 'marketing freedom' under the new Act. It concludes with a consideration of several over-arching concerns, including the state of parliamentary democracy and the rule of law in Canada
Las praderas de Canadá son uno de los graneros más grandes del mundo. Pero su ubicación en el centro del país, lejos de los mercados mundiales, aumenta la vulnerabilidad de los agricultores frente a los intermediarios, que transportan, manejan y comercian con su grano. Para protegerlos, el gobierno federal creó en 1935 el Canadian Wheat Board (CWB) (Junta Canadiense del Cereal), y le otorgó el monopolio del comercio en 1943. Sin embargo, este poder se vio atacado por el avance de la agenda neoliberal de libre mercado, pequeño gobierno, privatización y desregulación que fue ganando fuerza en los años 80 en Canadá y el resto del mundo. En 2011, el gobierno conservador de Canadá adoptó la controvertida Marketing Freedom for Grain Farmers Act (Ley de libre comercio para los productores de cereales), que acabó con el monopolio de la junta. Esta legislación es controvertida, no tanto por lo que hace, sino por cómo se hizo.
Este artículo explora los posibles efectos de esta ley sobre los productores de cereales de la pradera. Compara el funcionamiento de un mercado "abierto" (o privado) con el mercado "controlado" por la CWB; describe los desafíos neoliberales frente al monopolio de la CWB desde la década de 1980; y cuestiona la promesa de la "libertad de mercado" bajo la nueva ley. Concluye con la consideración de diversas preocupaciones globales, incluyendo el estado de la democracia parlamentaria y el estado de Derecho en Canadá.
DOWNLOAD THIS PAPER FROM SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2570821
Downloads
Downloads:
PDF 299
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.