Harm and governance of prisons’ systemic overcrowding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2044Keywords:
prison overcrowding, harm of prison experience, governance of systemic overcrowding, punishment, penal policyAbstract
Overcrowding has been on the national policy agendas of many jurisdictions for decades. While many other aspects of punishment are largely investigated as penal policy-related issues, overcrowding has not received the same attention. This article investigates how we may best understand prison congestion by considering it as a widely accepted operational condition for many prison systems. Following a brief introduction on how overcrowding is a structural problem in many jurisdictions, the essay is developed into three independent, but related, parts: an analysis of overcrowding and its definitional issues that includes a discussion of the theoretical and epistemological challenges it poses; a discussion of the impact and legitimacy of congestion on incarceration experience via the notion of ‘harm’; and, finally, the discussion of the concept of ‘governance of systemic overcrowding’. By doing so the paper aims to challenge the current knowledge on prison overcrowding and wants to suggest a new analytical standpoint, which, however, is deserving of further research.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
First_Online_Santorso_OSLS 177
References
Albrecht, H.J., 1988. Particular Difficulties in Enforcing the Law arising out of basic Conflicts Between the Different Agencies Regarding the Best Suited Reactions upon Highly Sensitive Kinds of Crime. In: Council of Europe, ed., Interactions within the Criminal Justice System. Strasbourg, 41–82.
Albrecht, H.J., 2012. Prison overcrowding–finding effective solutions: strategies and best practices against overcrowding in correctional facilities [online]. Edition Iuscrim. Available at: https://static.mpicc.de/shared/data/pdf/research_in_brief_43_-_albrecht_prisonvercrowding.pdf
Baggio, S., et al., 2020. Do overcrowding and turnover cause violence in prison? Frontiers in Psychiatry [online], 10, 1015–19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01015
Behan, C., 2022. No longer a “collateral consequence”: Imprisonment and the reframing of citizenship. European Journal of Criminology [online], 19(6), 1283–1303. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370820961066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370820961066
Bleich, J., 1989. The politics of prison crowding. California Law Review [online], 77(5), 1125–1180. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3480644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3480644
Box, S., and Hale, C., 1985. Unemployment, imprisonment and prison overcrowding. Contemporary Crises [online], 9(3), 209–228. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00728593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00728593
Bryans, S., 2000. The managerialisation of prisons: Efficiency without a purpose? Criminal Justice Matters [online], 40(1), 7–8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09627250008552852 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09627250008552852
Cate, S.D., 2022. The Mississippi model: Dangers of prison reform in the context of fiscal austerity. Punishment & Society [online], 24(4), 715–741. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211006176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211006176
Christian, J., Mellow, J., and Thomas, S., 2006. Social and economic implications of family connections to prisoners. Journal of Criminal Justice [online], 34(4), 443–452. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.05.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.05.010
Chung, S.Y., 2000. Prison Overcrowding: Standards in Determining Eighth Amendment Violations. Fordham Law Review [online], 68(6), 2351–2400. Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol68/iss6/9
Clear, T.R., 1994. Harm in American penology: Offenders, victims, and their communities. New York: SUNY Press.
Clemmer, D., 1958. The Prison Community. Chicago: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Cliquennois, G., and Birch, P., 2020. Prison overcrowding: Examining the problem through the prism of the European Court of Human Rights. In: P. Birch and L. Sicard, eds., Prisons and Community Corrections [online]. Abingdon: Routledge, 43–56. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003010562-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003010562-4
Cliquennois, G., Snacken, S., and Van Zyl Smit, D., 2021. Can European human rights instruments limit the power of the national state to punish? A tale of two Europes. European Journal of Criminology [online], 18(1), 11–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370820980354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370820980354
Cohen, F., 1985. Corrections Law Developments-Search and Seizure of Prison Cells-The Constitution Takes a Holiday. Criminal Law Bulletin, 21(3), 237–243.
Cohen, S., 2001. States of Denial. Knowing About Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cohen, S., and Taylor, L., 1981. Psychological Survival: The Experience of Long-term Imprisonment. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Condry, R., and Minson, S., 2021. Conceptualizing the effects of imprisonment on families: Collateral consequences, secondary punishment, or symbiotic harms? Theoretical Criminology [online], 25(4), 540–558. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480619897078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480619897078
Crewe, B., 2011. Depth, weight, tightness: Revisiting the pains of imprisonment. Punishment & society [online], 13(5), 509–529. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474511422172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474511422172
Davis, A.Y., and Rodriguez, D., 2000. The challenge of prison abolition: A conversation. Social Justice, 27(3(81), 212–218.
Dayan, C., 2011.The Law Is a White Dog: How Legal Rituals Make and Unmake Persons [online]. Princeton University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691070919.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691070919.001.0001
De Viggiani, N., 2007. Unhealthy prisons: exploring structural determinants of prison health. Sociology of health & illness, 29(1), 115–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00474.x
DiIulio, J.J.,1990. Governing prisons. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Duff, A., and Garland, D., eds., 1994. A reader on punishment. Oxford University Press.
Dye, M.H., 2010. Deprivation, importation, and prison suicide: Combined effects of institutional conditions and inmate composition. Journal of Criminal Justice [online], 38(4), 796–806. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.05.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.05.007
ECtHR, 2022. Guide on Article 3 of the Convention – Prohibition of Torture [online]. Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights, 1–42. Available at: https://ks.echr.coe.int/web/echr-ks/article-3
Farrington, D.P., and Nuttall, C.P., 1980. Prison size, overcrowding, prison violence, and recidivism. Journal of Criminal Justice [online], 8(4), 221–231. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(80)90002-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(80)90002-1
Favuzza, F., 2017. Torreggiani and prison overcrowding in Italy. Human Rights Law Review, 17(1), 153–173.
Feeley, M.M., and Simon, J., 1992. The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology [online], 30(4), 449–474. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.x
Fitzgerald, M., and Sim, J., 1982. British Prisons. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Foucault, M., 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.
Frottier, P., et al., 2002. Jailhouse blues revisited. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology [online], 37, 68–73. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s127-002-8217-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s127-002-8217-7
Garcia-Guerrero, J., and Marco, A., 2012. Overcrowding in prisons and its impact on health. Revista Española de Sanidad Penitenciaria [online], 14(3), 106–113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4321/S1575-06202012000300006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4321/S1575-06202012000300006
Garland, D., 2001. Introduction: The meaning of mass imprisonment. Punishment & Society [online], 3(1), 5–7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228203
Gilmore, R.W., 2022. Abolition geography: Essays towards liberation. London: Verso Books.
Ginn, S., and Robinson, R., 2012. Prison environment and health. British Medical Journal [online], 345, p. e5921. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5921
Goffman, E., 1961. Asylums. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Guetzkow, J., and Schoon, E., 2015. If you build it, they will fill it: The consequences of prison overcrowding litigation. Law & Society Review [online], 49(2), 401–432. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12140
Guo, W., et al., 2019. A systematic scoping review of environmental health conditions in penal institutions. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health [online], 222(5), 790–803. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.05.001
Haney, C., 2005. Death by design: Capital punishment as a social psychological system [online]. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195182408.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195182408.001.0001
Haney, C., 2006. The Wages of Prison Overcrowding: Harmful Psychological Consequences and Dysfunctional Correctional Reactions. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy [online], 22(1), 265–294. Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol22/iss1/22
Haney, C., 2020. The science of solitary: Expanding the harmfulness narrative. Northwestern University Law Review [online], 115(1), 211–256. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/nulr/vol115/iss1/5/
Hannah-Moffat, K., and Lynch, M., 2012. Theorizing punishment’s boundaries. Theoretical Criminology [online], 16(2), 119–121. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480612443303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480612443303
Hirst, P., 1984. The Concept of Punishment. Law in Context: Socio-Legal Journal, 2, 73–88.
Irwin, J., and Owen, B., 2013. Harm and the contemporary prison. In: A. Liebling and S. Maruna, eds., The effects of imprisonment. Abingdon: Routledge, 94–117.
Ismail, N., 2020. The politics of austerity, imprisonment and ignorance: a case study of English prisons. Medicine, Science and the Law [online], 60(2), 89–92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802419899744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802419899744
Johnson, R., Rocheleau, A.M., and Martin, A.B., 2016.. Hard Time: A Fresh Look at Understanding and Reforming the Prison. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Keller, H., and Sweet, A.S., eds., 2008. A Europe of rights: the impact of the ECHR on national legal systems. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535262.001.0001
King, R.D., and McDermott, K., 1995. The state of our prisons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lacey, N., 2008. The Prisoners’ Dilemma [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819247
Lappi-Seppala, T., 2005. Reducing the prison population: long-term experiences from Finland. In: Council of Europe, ed., Crime Policy in Europe. Strasbourg, 139–155.
Mathiesen, T., 1990. Prison on Trial. London: Sage.
Mauer, M., and Nellis, A., 2018. The meaning of life: The case for abolishing life sentences. New York: The New Press.
McLeod, A.M., 2015. Prison abolition and grounded justice. UCLA Law Review [online], 62, 1156. Available at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1490/
Mullen, J., 1985. Prison Crowding and the Evolution of Public Policy. National Institute of Corrections: Our Crowded Prisons. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science [online], 478(1), 31–46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716285478001004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716285478001004
Paulus, P., et al., 1975. Some effects of crowding in a prison environment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology [online], 5(1), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1975.tb00674.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1975.tb00674.x
Penal Reform International, 2023. Global Prison Trends 2023 [online]. Available at: https://www.penalreform.org/global-prison-trends-2023/
Pitts, J.M., Griffin, O.H., and Johnson, W.W., 2014. Contemporary prison overcrowding: Short-term fixes to a perpetual problem. Contemporary Justice Review [online], 17(1), 124–139. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2014.883844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2014.883844
Pratt, J., and Eriksson, A., 2014. Contrasts in Punishment: An Explanation of Anglophone Excess and Nordic Exceptionalism [online]. Abingdon: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203096116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203096116
Price, J.M., 2015. Prison and social death. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt15jjc08
Santorso, S., 2015. La perception de la peine d’emprisonnement entre privation et solidarité: Une analyse des conditions matérielles de vie des détenus. Déviance et Société [online], 39(2), 171–188. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3917/ds.392.0171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/ds.392.0171
Santorso, S., 2023. The Politics of Prison Crowding: A Critical Analysis of the Italian Prison System [online]. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003030997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003030997
Scarry, E., 2020. The body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world. In: M. Fraser and M. Greco, eds., The Body [online]. Abingdon: Routledge, 324–326. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060338-55 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060338-55
Schoenfeld, H., 2010. Mass incarceration and the paradox of prison conditions litigation. Law & Society Review [online], 44(3–4), 731–768. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00421.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00421.x
Silberman, M., 1995. A World of Violence: Corrections in America. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Simon, J., 2007. Rise of the Carceral State. Social Research [online], 74(2), 471–508. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2007.0000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2007.0000
Simon, J., 2015. The new overcrowding. Connecticut Law Review [online], 48, 1191–2116. Available at: https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/law_review/325/
Slade, K., 2018. Dual harm: an exploration of the presence and characteristics for dual violence and self-harm behaviour in prison. Journal of Criminal Psychology [online], 8(2), 97–111. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-03-2017-0017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-03-2017-0017
Sowle, S.D., 1994. Regime of social death: criminal punishment in the age of prisons. New York University Review on Law & Social Change [online], 21(3), 497–566. Available at: https://socialchangenyu.com/review/regime-of-social-death-criminal-punishment-in-the-age-of-prisons-a/
Steiner, B., and Wooldridge, J., 2009. Rethinking the link between institutional crowding and inmate misconduct. The Prison Journal [online], 89, 205–233. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885509334804 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885509334804
Sykes, G., 1958. The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum-Security Prison. Princeton University Press.
van Ginneken, E., Sutherland, A., and Molleman, T., 2017. An ecological analysis of prison overcrowding and suicide rates in England and Wales, 2000–2014. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry [online], 50, 76–82. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.05.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.05.005
Wacquant, L., 2001. Deadly symbiosis: When ghetto and prison meet and mesh. Punishment & society [online], 3(1), 95–133. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228276
Wacquant, L., 2009. Prisons of poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ward, T., and Stewart, C., 2003. Criminogenic needs and human needs: A theoretical model. Psychology, Crime & Law [online], 9, 125–143. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316031000116247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316031000116247
Warmsley, R., 2005. Prison health care and the extent of prison overcrowding. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 1(1), 3–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449200500156897
White, A.A., 2008. The concept of “less eligibility” and the social function of prison violence in class society. Buffalo Law Review, 56(3), 737–820.
Woollard, F., 2012. The doctrine of doing and allowing II: The moral relevance of the doing/allowing distinction. Philosophy Compass [online], 7(7), 459–469. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00492.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00492.x
Zedner, L., 2016. Penal subversions: When is a punishment not punishment, who decides and on what grounds?. Theoretical Criminology [online], 20(1), 3–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480615598830 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480615598830
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Simone Santorso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.