The Italian Supervisory Court’s professional culture and practices
Among legal norms, bureaucratization, and prison moral environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2037Keywords:
prisoners' rights, supervisory judge, rehabilitationAbstract
This article presents a socio-legal reflection on the role of the Italian supervisory judge in shaping the prison moral environment. The Italian supervisory judges ("magistrati di sorveglianza") officially perform two main functions: supervising the enforcement of sentences; and monitoring application of the law in prisons. They should therefore play a key role in terms not only of achieving the rehabilitative ideal, but also of preventing violations of prisoners’ rights. Nevertheless, traditionally they have never fully accomplished their mission of prison supervision, and only in a very few cases do they regularly visit prisons, since they are usually more focused on other (often bureaucratic and formalistic) tasks. Using ethnographic notes collected while acting as an external expert in an Italian Supervisory Court, in this paper I will reflect on how informal norms affect the ordinary practices and the decision-making process, with reference to both of the above-mentioned institutional mandates.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
First_Online_Ronco_OSLS 19
References
Aizpurua, E., and Rogan, M., 2021. Rights protection in prisons: Understanding recommendations-making by prison inspection and monitoring bodies in the European Union. Punishment & Society [online], 23(4), 455-477. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211020818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211020818
Anastasia, S., 2012. Metamorfosi penitenziarie. Carcere, pena e mutamento sociale. Rome: Ediesse.
Banakar, R., 2015. Normativity in Legal Sociology: Methodological Reflection on Law and Regulation in Late Modernity [online]. London: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09650-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09650-6
Blumberg, A., 1967. The practice of law as a confidence game: Organizational co-optation of a profession. Law & Society Review [online], 1(2), 15-40. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3052933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3052933
Bosworth, M., 2017. Border criminology and the changing nature of penal power. In: A. Liebling, S. Maruna and L. McAra, eds., Oxford Handbook of Criminology [online]. 6th ed. Oxford University Press, 373–390. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198719441.003.0017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198719441.003.0017
Brandariz, J. A, 2022. Beyond the austerity-driven hypothesis: Political economic theses on penality and the recent prison population decline. European Journal of Criminology, 19(3), 349–367. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211000640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211000640
Church, T.W., 1982. Examining Local Legal Culture Practitioner Attitudes in Four Criminal Courts. Williamsburg: National Center for State Courts.
Cotterrell, R., 2006. Law, Culture and Society: Legal ideas in the mirror of social theory. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Cotterrell, R., 2017. Sociological Jurisprudence [online]. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167527 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167527
Davies, A., 2003. Are prisons obsolete? New York: Seven Stories Press.
De Giorgi, A., 2006. Re-thinking the political economy of punishment. Aldershot: Ashgate.
De Giorgi, A., 2013a. Prisons and social structure in late-capitalist societies. In: D. Scott, ed., Why prison? [online] Cambridge University Press, 25-43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139344258.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139344258.004
De Giorgi, A., 2013b. Punishment and political economy. In: R. Sparks and J. Simon, eds., The Sage Handbook of punishment and society [online]. London: Sage, 40-59. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247624.n3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247624.n3
Drake, D., 2012. Prisons, Punishment and the Pursuit of Security [online]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137004833 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137004833
Edney, R., 1997. Prison Officers and Violence. Alternative Law Journal, 22(6), 289-297.
Ellis, C., 2016. Telling secrets, revealing lives. Qualitative Inquiries [online], 13(1), 3-29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947
Emerson, R.M., 1969. Judging Delinquents: Context and Social Process in Juvenile Court. Chicago: Aldine.
Fassin, D., 2013. Enforcing order: An ethnography of urban policing. Cambridge: Wiley Polity.
Ferrajoli, L., 2024. Giustizia e politica. Crisi e rifondazione del garantismo penale. Bari: Laterza.
Fiorio, C., 2014. Il diritto penitenziario tra sicurezza e garanzie. Democrazia e Diritto [online], 3, 84-108. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3280/DED2014-003006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/DED2014-003006
Flower and S. Klosterkamp, eds., Courtroom Ethnography. Exploring Contemporary Approaches, Fieldwork and Challenges [online]. London: Palgrave McMacmillan. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37985-7_4
Freidson, E., 1988. Professional Powers. A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, L.M., 1969. Legal culture and social development. Law and Society Review [online], 4, 29-44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3052760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3052760
Gallo, Z., 2015. Punishment, authority, and political economy: Italian challenges to western punitiveness. Punishment & Society [online], 17(5), 598-623. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474515615695 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474515615695
Gallo, Z., 2018. Punishment in a hybrid political economy. The Italian case (1970-2010). In: D. Melossi, M. Sozzo and J.A. Brandariz-García, eds., The political economy of punishment today. Visions, debates and challenges [online]. London: Routledge, 160-184. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315542713-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315542713-8
Galtung, J., 1969. Violence, Peace and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research [online], 6(3), 167-91. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336900600301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336900600301
Garland, D., 2002. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199258024.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199258024.001.0001
Gianfilippi, F., 2015. Tra gusci di noce e tende di cielo: un percorso per la tutela dei diritti dei detenuti. Questione Giustizia, 2, 90-95.
Hambly, J., 2023. Framing the view. In: L. Flower and S. Klosterkamp, eds., Courtroom Ethnography. Exploring Contemporary Approaches, Fieldwork and Challenges [online]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 17-32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37985-7_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37985-7_2
Hester, S., and Eglin, P., 2017. A sociology of crime [online]. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315660318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315660318
Klosterkamp, S., and Anwar, S., 2023. Positionality and Research Ethics. In: L. Flower and S. Klosterkamp, eds., Courtroom Ethnography. Exploring Contemporary Approaches, Fieldwork and Challenges [online]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 47-60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37985-7_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37985-7_4
Llewellyn, K. (with F. Schauer, ed.), 2011. The Theory of Rules [online]. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226487977.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226487977.001.0001
Llewellyn, K., 1960. The Bramble Bush. New York: Oceana. (Originally published in 1930).
Llewellyn, K., 2008. Jurisprudence. Realism in Theory and Practice. New Brunswick: University of Chicago Press. (Originally published in 1962).
McCulloch, J., and Scraton, P., 2008. The Violence of Incarceration. An Introduction. In: P. Scraton and J. McCulloch, eds., The Violence of Incarceration [online]. London: Routledge, 1-18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003421818-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003421818-1
Medlicott, D., 2008. Preventing Torture and Casual Cruelty in Prison Through Independent Monitoring. In: P. Scraton and J. McCulloch, eds., The violence of incarceration [online]. London: Routledge, 244-260. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003421818-13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003421818-13
Mosconi, G., and Pavarini, M., 1993. Discrezionalità e sentencing penitenziario, la flessibilità della pena in fase esecutiva nell’attività dei tribunali di sorveglianza (1987-1990). Dei delitti e delle pene, 3, 149-189.
Nelken, D., 2004. Using the Concept of Legal Culture. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 29, 1-28.
Renoldi, C., 2007. La Magistratura di Sorveglianza tra crisi di legittimazione e funzione rieducativa della pena. Questione Giustizia, 1, 23-42.
Romano L., 2021. La settimana santa. Potere e violenza nelle carceri italiane. Naples: Napoli Monitor.
Santorso, S., 2023. The Politics of Prison Crowding. A Critical Analysis of the Italian Prison System [online]. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003030997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003030997
Sarzotti, C., 2010. Il campo giuridico del penitenziario: appunti per una ricostruzione. In: E. Santoro, ed., Diritto come questione sociale. Turin: Giappichelli, 181-238.
Sbraccia, A., 2018. Contenere il malessere? Salute e socialità in carcere. In: E. Kalica and S. Santorso, eds., Farsi la galera. Spazi e culture del penitenziario. Verona: Ombrecorte, 131-168.
Scomparin, L., 2012. Istanze rieducative e nuovi modelli di giurisdizione penale: l’identità perduta della magistratura di sorveglianza? Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale, 5(4), 1402-1424.
Scomparin, L., and Torrente, G., 2021, Not Citizens, Not Real People. The Italian Way of Governing Immigration through the Criminal Justice System. Revista española de investigación criminológica [online], 18(2), 1-34. Available at: https://doi.org/10.46381/reic.v18i2.339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46381/reic.v18i2.339
Scott, D., 2015. Eating your insides out: cultural, physical and institutionally-structured violence in the prison place. Prison Service Journal, 221, 58-62.
Scott, D., 2018, Haunted by the Presence of Death: Prisons, Abolition and the Right to Life. In: E. Stanley, ed., Human Rights and Incarceration. Critical Explorations [online]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 129-151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95399-1_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95399-1_6
Sim, J., 2002. The Future of Prison Health Care: A Critical Analysis. Critical Social Policy, 22(2), 300-323. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183020220020701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183020220020701
Simon, J., 2014. Mass Incarceration on Trial. New York: The New Press.
Stanley, E., 2018, Human Rights and Incarceration. In: E. Stanley, ed., Human Rights and Incarceration. Critical Explorations [online]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95399-1_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95399-1_1
Stumpf, J., 2006. The crimmigration crisis: Immigrants, crime, and sovereign power. The American University Law Review [online], 56(2), 307–419. Available at: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr/vol56/iss2/3/
Vaughn, M.S., 1999. Penal Harm Medicine: State Torture Remedies for Delaying and Denying Health Care to Prisoners. Crime, Law & Social Change [online], 31, 273-302. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008332904378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008332904378
Vianello F., 2018a. Cultura giuridica ed esecuzione della pena: processi decisionali in tema di misure alternative alla detenzione. Questione Giustizia, 3, 141-145.
Vianello F., 2018b. Norme, codici e condotte: la cultura del penitenziario. Gli attori sociali di fronte alla criticità dell’ambiente carcerario. Sociologia del diritto [online], 3, 67-85. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3280/SD2018-003004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/SD2018-003004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Daniela Ronco
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
