Authoritarian constitutionalism, judicial capture or the ambivalence of modern law: The case of the Chilean Constitutional Tribunal

Eduardo Chia

doi:10.35295/osls.iisl.1903

Authors

Eduardo A. Chia Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0123-4231

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1903

Keywords:

Chilean constitutional tribunal, authoritarian constitutionalism, judiciary, ratio and voluntas, authoritarian neoliberalism

Abstract

This paper explores the tension between ratio and voluntas in modern law. The work builds primarily on literature analysis to critically engage with two interrelated issues: (i) the notion of “authoritarian constitutionalism” and (ii) the ambivalences observed in judicature’s conceptual articulation and institutional structuration. Then, it presents Chile’s legal order as a study case, examining how the practice and decisions of its Constitutional Tribunal in specific periods exemplify the aforementioned interplay. Afterwards, it incorporates reviews of recent experiences of “democratic backslide” in selected Central and Eastern European countries for a broader comparative dimension. These cases, despite their distinct economic and historical-political contexts, support the paper’s suggestion of a universally observable yet contingently manifested conflicted duality in constitutional orders —oscillating between liberation and repression.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Views 93
Downloads:
First_Online_Chia_OSLS 85

Author Biography

Eduardo A. Chia, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main

Eduardo A. Chia, Institute for Criminal Justice and Philosophy of Law, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main. Email address: eduardo.chia@gmail.com

References

Adorno, T., et al., 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper & Brothers.

Alemparte, B., 2022. Towards a Theory of Neoliberal Constitutionalism: Addressing Chile’s first Constitution-making Laboratory. Global Constitutionalism [online], 11(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381721000058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381721000058

Ansaldi, O., and Pardo-Vergara, M., 2020. What Constitution? On Chile’s Constitutional Awakening, Law & Critique [online], 31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-020-09260-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-020-09260-0

Atria, F., 2011. Jurimprudencia Constitucional. In: P. Marshall, ed., Jurisprudencia constitucional destacada. Santiago: Legal Publishing, 160-165.

Atria, F., 2020. Sobre el Tribunal Constitucional en la Doctrina Tradicional (I): Conceptualismo Constitucional. Derecho y Crítica Social, 6(1).

Augustine, 1841. Contra Faustum Manichaeum. In: J.P. Migne, ed., Patrologia Latina (Patrologiae Cursus Completus), 42. Paris. (Original from 400 a.D.).

Barros, R., 2002. Constitutionalism and Dictatorship: Pinochet, the Junta, and the 1980 Constitution [online]. New York: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606298

Barros, R., 2009. Courts Out of Context: Authoritarian Sources of Judicial Failure in Chile (1973–1990) and Argentina (1976–1983). In: T. Ginsburg and T. Moustafa, eds., Rule by Law. The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press, 156-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814822.007

Bassa, J., 2015. El Tribunal Constitucional en la Constitución chilena vigente. In: J. Bassa, J.C. Ferrada and C. Viera, eds., La Constitución chilena. Una revisión crítica a su práctica política. Santiago: LOM, 253-284.

Bastida, F., 1986. Jueces y franquismo. El pensamiento político del Tribunal Supremo en la dictadura. Barcelona: Ariel.

Bazyler, M., 2016. Holocaust, Genocide, and the Law. A Quest for Justice in a Post-Holocaust World [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195395693.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195395693.001.0001

Bernhard, M., 2021. Democratic Backsliding in Poland and Hungary. Slavic Review [online], 80(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/slr.2021.145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/slr.2021.145

Bickel, A., 1986. The Least Dangerous Branch. The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press. (Originally published in 1962).

Biebricher, T., 2020. Neoliberalism and Authoritarianism. Global Perspectives [online], 1(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1525/001c.11872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/001c.11872

Brewer-Carías, A.R., 2011. Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators: A Comparative Law Study [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511994760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511994760

Bruff, I., and Tansel, C.B., eds., 2020. Authoritarian Neoliberalism. Philosophies, Practices, Contestations [online]. New York: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429355028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429355028

Brunkert, L., Kruse, S., and Welzel, C., 2018. A Tale of Culture-bound Regime Evolution: The Centennial Democratic Trend and its Recent Reversal. Democratisation [online], 26(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1542430 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1542430

Buckel, S., 2007. Subjektivierung und Kohäsion. Zur Rekonstruktion einer materialistischen Theorie des Rechts. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.

Castaldo, A., and Memoli, V., 2024. Political Support and Democratic Backsliding Trends. The Strange Case of Central and Eastern European Countries. Journal of Contemporary European Studies [online], 32(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.2206115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.2206115

Chia, E.A., and Quezada, F., 2017. Rol del Estado, Justicia Constitucional y Derechos Fundamentales en el marco de una Nueva Constitución. En: J. Cifuentes, C. Pérez y S. Rivera, eds., ¿Qué Políticas Públicas para Chile? Santiago: Centro de Estudios para el Desarrollo, 64-81.

Cianetti, L., Dawson, J., and Hanley, S., eds., 2019. Rethinking ‘Democratic Backsliding’ in Central and Eastern Europe [online]. New York: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429264795 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429264795

Cordero, R., 2019. The Negative Dialectics of Law: Luhmann and the Sociology of Juridical Concepts. Social and Legal Studies [online], 29(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663918819173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663918819173

Cotterrell, R., 1995. Law’s Community. Legal Theory in Sociological Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Couso, J., et al., 2011. Constitutional Law in Chile. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer.

Čuroš, P., and Moliterno, J., 2021. Recent Attacks on Judicial Independence: The Vulgar, the Systemic, and the Insidious. German Law Journal [online], 22(7). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.63 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.63

Dahl, R.A., 2006. Decision-Making in a Democracy. The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker. In: R. Bellamy, ed., Constitutionalism and Democracy. New York: Routledge. (Originally published in 1957).

Drake, P.W., 1978. Corporatism and Functionalism in Modern Chilean Politics. Journal of Latin American Studies [online], 10(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X00019751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X00019751

Dworkin, R., 2016. Judicial Discretion. In: R. Bellamy, ed., The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers [online]. New York: Routledge. (Originally published in 1963). Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315085302-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315085302-7

Fine, B., 2002. Democracy and the Rule of Law. Marx’s Critique of the Legal Form. Caldwell: Blackburn Press. (Originally published in 1984).

Frankenberg, G., 2019. Authoritarian Constitutionalism—Coming Terms with Modernity’s Nightmares. In: H. Alviar and G. Frankenberg, eds., Authoritarian Constitutionalism. Comparative Analysis and Critique [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1–36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788117852.00006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788117852.00006

Frankenberg, G., 2020. Authoritarianism. Constitutional Perspectives [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800372726 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800372726

Gallo, E., 2022. Three Varieties of Authoritarian Neoliberalism: Rule by the Experts, the People, the Leader. Competition and Change [online], 26(5). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294211038425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294211038425

Giannoulopoulos, D., and McDermott, Y., eds., 2022. Judicial Independence Under Threat [online]. Oxford: The British Academy/Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197267035.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197267035.001.0001

Gözler, K., 2008. Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments: A Comparative Study. Bursa: Ekin Press.

Graver, H.P., 2014. Judges Against Justice: On Judges When the Rule of Law is Under Attack [online]. Heidelberg: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44293-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44293-7

Graver, H.P., 2018a. Judicial Independence Under Authoritarian Rule: An Institutional Approach to the Legal Tradition of the West. Hague Journal on the Rule Law [online], 10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0071-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0071-8

Graver, H.P., 2018b. Why Adolf Hitler Spared the Judges: Judicial Opposition Against the Nazi State. German Law Journal [online], 19(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200022896 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200022896

Graver, H.P., 2019. Der Krieg der Richter. Die deutsche Besatzung 1940-1945 und der norwegische Rechtsstaat [online]. Trans.: M. Hack. Baden-Baden: Nomos. (Originally published in 2015). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845296296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845296296

Griffiths, J.A.G., 1997. Politics of the Judiciary. 5th ed. London: Fontana Press. (Originally published in 1977).

Günther, K., forthcoming, 2025. Rule of Law or Rule by Law? A Crisis Symptom of Constitutional Democracy [Forthcoming in a collective volume].

Habermas, J., 1987. Wie ist Legitimität durch Legalität möglich? Kritische Justiz [online], 20(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5771/0023-4834-1987-1-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0023-4834-1987-1-1

Habermas, J., 1992. Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Hilbink, L., 2007. Judges Beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile [online]. New York: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511509

Hirschl, R., 2004. Towards Juristocracy. The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hobbes, T. (with J.C.A. Gaskin, ed., intro. and notes), 1996. Leviathan. New York: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1651).

Huneeus, C., 2007. The Pinochet Regime [online]. Trans.: L. Sagari. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781626371583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781626371583

Jessop, B., 2019. Authoritarian Neoliberalism: Periodisation and Critique. South Atlantic Quarterly [online], 118(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-7381182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-7381182

Keane, K., 2020. The New Despotism [online]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674246713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674246713

Kelsen, H., 2006. General Theory of Law and State. New Brunswick: Transaction. (Originally published in 1949).

Kelsen, H., 2019. Wer soll der Hüter der Verfassung sein? Zweite Auflage [online]. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. (Originally published in 1931). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-158979-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-158979-9

Kennedy, D., 1997. A Critique of Adjudication. {Fin de siècle}. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lavis, S., 2020. The Exception and the Norm in the Third Reich. In: C. Cercel, G.G. Fusco and S. Lavis, eds., States of Exception. Law, History, Theory [online]. New York: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429022296-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429022296-5

Law, D., and Versteeg, M., 2013. Sham Constitutions. California Law Review [online], 101(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1989979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1989979

Lorenz, A., 2005. How to Measure Constitutional Rigidity: Four Concepts and Two Alternatives. Journal of Theoretical Politics [online], 17(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629805052883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629805052883

Lovera, D., 2022. Chile. In: C. Hübner Mendes, R. Gargarella and S. Guidi, eds., Oxford Handbook of Constitutional Law in Latin America [online]. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786900.013.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786900.013.4

Lovera, D., and Contreras, P., 2023. El Tribunal Constitucional Chileno y la doctrina de reformas constitucionales inconstitucionales: una doctrina inconveniente. Revista Justicia y Derecho [online], 6(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.32457/rjyd.v6i2.2161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32457/rjyd.v6i2.2161

Lovera, D., and Vargas, C., 2021. El Congreso Nacional y la Interpretación Constitucional en el Proceso Legislativo: Criterios y Momentos. Revista Chilena de Derecho [online], 48(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.7764/R.483.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7764/R.483.4

Lührmann, A., and Lindberg, S., 2019. A third wave of Autocratization is here: what is new about it? Democratisation [online], 26(7). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029

Madariaga, A., 2020. Neoliberal Resilience: Lessons in Democracy and Development from Latin America and Eastern Europe. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691182599.001.0001

Mańko, R., et al., eds., 2024. Law, Populism and the Political in Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032624464

Marcuse, H., 1936. Teil III, Ideengeschichtler. In: M. Horkheimer, ed., Studien über Autorität und Familie, 5. Lüneburg: Dietrich zu Klampen, 136-228.

Marx, K., 1977. The Constitution of the French Republic adopted November 4, 1848. MEW, 10, 535-548. (Originally published in 1851). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783050076034-059

Maus, I., 2018. Justiz als gesellschaftliches Über-Ich. Zur Position der Rechtsprechung in der Demokratie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Neumann, F.L., 1936/1986. The Rule of Law. Political Theory and the Legal System in Modern Society. Leamington Spa: Berg.

Neumann, F.L., 1937. Der Funktionswandel des Gesetzes im Recht der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung [online], 6(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5840/zfs1937633 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/zfs1937633

Neumann, F.L., 1952. On the Limits of Justifiable Disobedience. In: R.M. MacIver, ed., Conflict of Loyalties. New York: Harper & Brothers.

Neumann, F.L., 2009. Behemoth. The Structure and Practice of National Socialism 1933-1944. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee. (Originally published in 1942).

Niembro, R., 2016. Conceptualizing Authoritarian Constitutionalism. Verfassung und Recht in Übersee [online], 49(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-2016-4-339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-2016-4-339

Pinochet, A., 1977. Discurso en Cerro Chacarillas, con ocasión del Día de la Juventud el 9 de julio de 1977. Nueva Institucionalidad en Chile. Discursos de S.E. el Presidente de la República General de Ejército D. Augusto Pinochet Ugarte. Santiago: Memoria Chilena/Biblioteca Nacional de Chile.

Ponce de León, V., and Soto, P., eds., 2021. El Tribunal Constitucional frente al proceso constituyente. Ensayos críticos sobre su jurisprudencia y sus prácticas. Santiago: Thomson Reuters.

Pozas-Loyo, A., and Ríos-Figueroa, J., 2022. Authoritarian Constitutionalism. In: C. Hübner Mendes, R. Gargarella and S. Guidi, eds., Oxford Handbook of Constitutional Law in Latin America [online]. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786900.013.17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786900.013.17

Raz, J., 1993. On the Autonomy of Legal Reasoning. Ratio Iuris [online], 6(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1993.tb00134.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1993.tb00134.x

Rousseau, J.J., 2007. Du contrat social. Amsterdam: Metalibri. (Originally published in 1762).

Roznai, Y., 2017. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers. Oxford University Press.

Sadurski, W., 2019. Polish Constitutional Tribunal Under PiS: From an Activist Court to a Paralysed Tribunal, to a Governmental Enabler. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law [online], 11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0078-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0078-1

Santos, B.S., 2020. Toward a New Legal Common Sense. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 2002).

Scheppele, K.L., 2018. Autocratic Legalism. The University of Chicago Law Review [online], 85(2). Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev/vol85/iss2/2/

Schmitt, C., 2017. Verfassungslehre. Elfte Auflage [online]. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. (Originally published in 1928). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-55206-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-55206-1

Sembler, C., 2022. Familia y Sociedad en la Génesis de la Constitución de 1980. Revista Temas Sociológicos [online], 31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29344/07196458.31.3323 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29344/07196458.31.3323

Shklar, J., 1964. Rousseau’s Images of Authority. American Political Science Review [online], 58(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1953290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1953290

Siavelis, P., 2002. Exaggerated Presidentialism and Moderate Presidents: Executive–Legislative Relations in Chile. In: S. Morgenstern and B. Nacif, eds., Legislative Politics in Latin America [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615665.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615665.005

Silbey, S., 2005. After Legal Consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science [online], 1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115938

Somek, A., 2003. Authoritarian Constitutionalism: Austrian Constitutional Doctrine 1933 to 1938 and its Legacy. In: C. Joerges and N. Ghaleigh, eds., Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions. Oxford: Hart, 361-388.

Somek, A., 2014. The Cosmopolitan Constitution [online]. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199651535.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199651535.001.0001

Spång, M., 2018. Emancipation, Democracy and the Modern Critique of Law [online]. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62890-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62890-5

Tacik, P., 2019. A New Popular Front, or, on the Role of Critical Jurisprudence under Neo-Authoritarianism in Central-Eastern Europe. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica [online], 89. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.89.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.89.03

Thompson, E.P., 1975. Whigs and Hunters. The Origin of the Black Act. London: Penguin.

Tiede, L., 2016. The Political Determinants of Judicial Dissent: evidence from the Chilean Constitutional Tribunal. European Political Science Review [online], 8(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773915000090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773915000090

Tuori, K., 2016. Ratio and Voluntas. The Tension Between Reason and Will in Law [online]. London: Routledge. (Originally published in 2010). Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603629

Tuori, K., 2018. Whose voluntas, what ratio? Law in the State Tradition. International Journal of Constitutional Law [online], 16(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy093

Tushnet, M., 2013. Authoritarian Constitutionalism. Some Conceptual Issues. In: T. Ginsburg and A. Simpser, eds., Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes [online]. Cambridge University Press, 36-50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107252523.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107252523.004

Tushnet, M., 2015. Authoritarian Constitutionalism. Cornell Law Review [online], 100(2). Available at: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol100/iss2/3/

Viera, C., 2021. El Activismo Político del Tribunal Constitucional. In: V. Ponce de León and P. Soto, eds., 2021. El Tribunal Constitucional frente al proceso constituyente. Ensayos críticos sobre su jurisprudencia y sus prácticas. Santiago: Thomson Reuters, 19-36.

Wacks, R., 2021. The Rule of Law Under Fire? [online] Oxford: Hart. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509950614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509950614

Wilkinson, M.A., 2021. Authoritarian Liberalism and the Transformation of Modern Europe [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198854753.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198854753.001.0001

Ziółkowski, M., 2020. Two Faces of the Polish Supreme Court After “Reforms” of the Judiciary System in Poland: The Question of Judicial Independence and Appointments. European Papers [online], 5(1). Available at: https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/two-faces-of-polish-supreme-court-after-reforms-of-judiciary-system-in-poland