Forthcoming

Subordination, conformity and alignment

Lack of professional autonomy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1896

Keywords:

Rule of law, judiciary, judicial integration, legal profession, Legal Culture

Abstract

Can a judiciary operating in an autocratic political system be expected to defend the rule of law? What are the implications of the relative autonomy of the judges in such an environment? The main reason why judges are unable to affirm the values of the rule of law is that several conditions of resistance are lacking. Organizational, structural and cultural factors all play a role. The lack of professional solidarity is particularly important. The display of collective power by judges requires particular effort and is not supported by any tradition. The Hungarian political regime has severely eroded the internal culture of the judiciary in its post-2010 reforms of the judiciary. As a result, it is clear that the judicial system, which has received special European attention, cannot be expected to halt the deterioration of the rule of law. An understanding of the culture of subordination and conformity can contribute not only to the analysis of autocratic regimes but also to the reflection on the reconstruction of the rule of law.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

        Metrics

Views 106
Downloads:
First_Online_Fleck_OSLS 77


Author Biography

Zoltán Fleck, ELTE

Lawyer, sociologist, Professor of ELTE, Budapest. Email address: zfleck@ajk.elte.hu, Egyetem tér 1-3. 1056, Hungary.

References

Abel, R., 1998. Speaking Law to Power: Occasions for Cause Lawyering. In: A. Sarat and S. Scheingold, eds., Cause Lawyering. Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities [online]. Oxford University Press, 69–117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195113198.003.0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195113198.003.0003

BN, DM, EN v. Getin Noble Bank S.A. (2022) 9, judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 29 March 2022, EU:C:2022:235.

Bois, J., and Dawson, M., 2023. Towards a legally plausible theory of judicialization in the European Union, Journal of European Integration [online], 45(5), 823–842. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2190104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2190104

Bourdieu, P., 1990. The Logic of Practice [online]. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621749 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621749

Bourdieu, P., 2018. Habitus. In: J. Hillier and E. Rooksby, eds., Habitus: A Sense of Place. London: Routledge, 43–49. (Originally published in 2005).

Caenegem, R.C., 1992. Judges, Legislators and Professors: Chapters in European Legal History. Cambridge University Press.

Calhoun, C., Gaonkar, D.P., and Taylor, C., 2022. Degeneration of Democracy [online]. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674276024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2k4fwtt

Donati, P., and Archer, M.S., 2015. The Relational Subject [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316226780 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316226780

Farkas, L., 2020.The EU, Segregation and Rule of Law Resilience in Hungary. VerfBlog [online], 8 March. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20200308-214541-0

Filipek, P., 2022. Drifting Case-law on Judicial Independence: A Double Standard as to What Is a ‘Court’ Under EU Law? (CJEU Ruling in C-132/20 Getin Noble Bank). VerfBlog [online], 13 May. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20220513-182117-0

Fine, G.A., 2012. Tiny Publics: A Theory of Group Action and Culture. New York: Russell Sage.

Fine, G.A., 2021. The Hinge. Civil Society, Group Cultures, and the Power of Local Commitments [online]. The University of Chicago Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226745831.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226745831.001.0001

Fleck, Z., 2019. Bírói magatartások. Szociológiai vázlat a jogállam romlásához. Mozgó Világ 12–19.

Friedman, S., 2016. Habitus clivé and the emotional imprint of social mobility. The Sociological Review [online], 64(1), 129–147. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12280

Goffman, E., 1972. Encounters. Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. London: Allen Lane.

Goodman, N., 1978. Ways of Worldmaking [online]. Indianapolis: Hackett. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350928558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350928558

Graver, H., and Čuroš, P., 2021. Judges Under Stress: Understanding Continuity and Discontinuity of Judicial Institutions of the CEE Countries. German Law Journal [online], 22(7), 1147–1158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.73 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.73

Graver, H.P., 2015. Judges Against Justice. On Judges When the Rule of Law is Under Attack [online]. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44293-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44293-7

Gutmann, J., and Voigt, S., 2023. Militant constitutionalism: a promising concept to make constitutional backsliding less likely? Public Choice [online], 195, 377–404. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00874-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00874-1

Habermas, J., and Leaman, J., 1988. Concerning the Public Use of History. New German Critique [online], 44, 40–50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/488145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/488145

Halliday, T.C., 2023. Judges Under Stress: Legal Complexes and a Sociology of Hope [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4482114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4482114

Halliday, T.C., Karpik, L., and Feeley, M., eds., 2007. Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism. Oxford: Hart.

Halmai, G., 2017. The Early Retirement Age of the Hungarian Judges. In: F. Nicola and B. Davies, eds., EU Law Stories: Contextual and Critical Histories of European Jurisprudence [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316340479.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316340479.024

Hertogh, M., 2018. Nobody’s Law. Legal Consciousness and Legal Alienation in Everyday Life [online]. London/New York/Shanghai: Palgrave. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60397-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60397-5

Hillier, J., and Rooksby, E. 2016. Introduction to First Edition, In: J. Hillier and E. Rooksby, eds., Habitus: A Sense of Place [online]. London: Routledge, 19–42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315253701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315253701

Hirschl, R., 2007. Towards Juristocracy. The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.

Honneth, A., 2008. Reification. A New Look at An Old Idea [online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320466.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320466.001.0001

Hungarian Helsinki Committee, 2022. Smear Campaign Against a Hungarian Judge, the Spokesperson of the National Judicial Council (NJC) [online]. 14–20 August. Available at: https://helsinki.hu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Annex-I-Smear-Campaign-against-NJC-Members-First-Wave.pdf

Hupe, P., ed., 2022. The Politics of the Public Encounter. What Happens When Citizens Meet the State [online]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800889330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800889330

Joerges, C., and Ghaleigh, N.S., eds., 2003. Darker Legacies of Law in Europe. The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions. London: Bloomsbury.

Kazai, V.Z., 2018. Guilty of Homelessness – The Resurgence of Penal Populism in Hungary. VerfBlog [online], 31 October. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17176/20181102-110856-0

Kelemen, D., 2011. Eurolegalism. The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union [online]. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061057

Kenes, B., 2020. Viktor Orbán: Past to Present. ECPS Leader Profiles. European Center for Populism Studies (ECPS) [online]. 2 August. Available at: https://doi.org/10.55271/lp0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55271/lp0001

Krastev, I., 2020. Eastern Europe’s Illiberal Revolution. The Long Road to Democratic Decline. In: B. Vormann and M.D. Weinman, eds., The Emergence of Illiberalism. Understanding a Global Phenomenon [online]. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429347368-12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429347368-12

Krygier, M., 2008. The Rule of Law: Legality, Teleology, Sociology. In: G. Palombella and N. Walker, eds., Relocating the Rule of Law [online]. Oxford: Hart, 44–69. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472564634.ch-003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472564634.ch-003

Krygier, M., 2017. Tempering Power. In: M. Adams, A. Meuwese and E.H. Ballin, eds., Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law: Bridging Idealism and Realism [online]. Cambridge University Press, 34–59. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316585221.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316585221.002

Kühn, Z., 2011. The Judiciary in Central and Eastern Europe: Mechanical Jurisprudence in Transformation? [online] Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047429005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047429005

Lahire, B., 2011. The Plural Actor. London: Polity Press.

Maffesoli, M., 1996. The Time of the Tribes. The Decline of Individualism in Mass Society [online]. London: Sage. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446222133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446222133

Markovits, I., 2007. The Death of the Socialist Law? The Annual Review of Law and Social Science [online], 3, 233–253. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112849

Matthes, C.Y., 2022. Judges as activists: how Polish judges mobilise to defend the rule of law. East European Politics [online], 38(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2022.2092843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2022.2092843

Mazmanyan, A., 2012. Failing Constitutionalism: From Political Legalism to Defective Empowerment. Global Constitutionalism [online], 1(2), 313–33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381711000128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381711000128

McCoy, J., and Somer, M., 2019. Toward a theory of pernicious polarization and how it harms democracies: Comparative evidence and possible remedies. ANNALS AAPSS [online], 681(1), 234–271. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218818782 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218818782

Popova, M., 2012. Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies: A Study of Courts in Russia and Ukraine [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139055345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139055345

Puleo, L., and Coman, R., 2023. Explaining judges’ opposition when judicial independence is undermined: insights from Poland, Romania, and Hungary. Democratization [online], 31(1), 1–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2255833 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2255833

Rév, I., 1987. The Advantages of Being Atomized. How Hungarian Peasants Coped with Collectivization. Dissent, 335–349.

Rüthers, B., 2022. Die unbegrenzte Auslegung - Zum Wandel der Privatrechtsordnung im Nationalsozialismus. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. (Originally published in 1969).

Sajó, A., 2019. The Rule of Law as Legal Despotism: Concerned Remarks on the Use of “Rule of Law” in Illiberal Democracies. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law [online], 11, 371–376. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-019-00097-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-019-00097-z

Sajó, A., 2021. Ruling by Cheating. Governance in Illiberal Democracy [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108952996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108952996

Sztompka, P., 1993. Civilizational Incompetence: The Trap of Post-Communist Societies. Zeitschrift für Soziologie [online], 22(2), 85–95. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1993-0201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1993-0201

Tate, N., and Vallinder, T., eds., 1997. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York University Press.

Tóth, C., 2014. Full text of Viktor Orbán’s speech at Băile Tuşnad (Tusnádfürdő) of 26 July 2014. The Budapest Beacon [online], 29 July. Available at: https://budapestbeacon.com/full-text-of-viktor-orbans-speech-at-baile-tusnad-tusnadfurdo-of-26-july-2014/

Uzelac, A., 2010. Survival of the Third Tradition? Supreme Court law Review [online], 377–396. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2498760

Vadász, V., 2019. A Hungarian Judge Seeks Protection from the CJEU – Part II. VerfBlog [online], 7 August. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17176/20190807-201241-8

Weller, S., 2021. The Idea of Europe. A Critical History [online]. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108784252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108784252

Widlak, T., 2019 Judges’ s Virtues and Vices: outline of a Research Agenda for Legal Theory. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa I Filozofii Spolecznej. Journal of the Polish Section of IVR [online], 2(20), 51–62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2019.2.51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2019.2.51

Wójcik, A., 2022. Keeping the Past and the Present Apart: The CJEU, the Rule of Law Crisis, and Decommunization. VerfBlog [online], 26(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.17176/20220426-182140-0

Xu, B., 2022. The Culture of Democracy. London: Polity Press.

Published

27-06-2024

How to Cite

Fleck, Z. (2024) “Subordination, conformity and alignment: Lack of professional autonomy”, Oñati Socio-Legal Series. doi: 10.35295/osls.iisl.1896.

Issue

Section

Thematic Articles