Citizenship and housing cultures after COVID-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1743Keywords:
Citizenship, inhabiting, sociality, COVID-19Abstract
Citizenship appears to us as an incessant constituent process, as a dynamic that is never stabilised, as a continuous development of struggles, conflicts, tensions, relationships, contestations and negotiations between social groups and rulers, between subordinate movements and hegemonic institutions. On this level, we can already understand the city (both conceptually and practically) as a political space that crosses bodies, arranging, placing and dislocating them in a series of interactions and relations that configure sociality and power. It is from these interactions that a process of subjectification (valorisation and qualification) and social de-subjectification is initiated: a process that finds in the urban fabric the prerequisites for political realisation (individual and collective) and for the social recognition of human beings. Beyond the many aspects that accompany this discourse, what we are most interested in emphasising here is the relationship between the idea of citizenship, the exercise of political rights and the cultures of living, which after the state of emergency linked to COVID-19 has redesigned an idea of public health as a form on which to redefine social relations.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
14(3)_Ciampi_Marci_OSLS 255
XML_14(3)_Ciampi_Marci_OSLS 4
References
Augé, M., 1995. Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. London: Verso Books.
Balibar, É., 2002. Droit de cité. Culture et politique en démocratie. Paris: PUF.
Balibar, É., 2015. Citizenship. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Batty, M., 2020. The Coronavirus crisis: What will the post-pandemic city look like? Environmental Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science [online], 47(4), 547–52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320926912 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320926912
Bauman, Z., 2000. Missing Community. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Blanchot, M., 1984. La comunità inconfessabile. Milan: Feltrinelli.
Chatterjee, P., 2004. The Politics of the Governed. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ciampi, M., 2011. Forme dell’abitare. Un’analisi sociologica dello spazio borghese. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
Ciampi, M., 2021. Inhabiting the pandemic: a new relationship between body and space. In: E. Piccardo, ed., Pandemic city. Busalla: Plug_in, 72–79.
Ciampi, M., 2022. Vivere il quartiere. Esperienze di socialità e partecipazione a Tor Pignattara e Trullo. Rome: Carocci.
Colombo, E., and Rebughini, P., eds., 2021. Acrobati del presente. La vita quotidiana alla prova del lockdown. Rome: Carocci.
Dahrendorf, R., 1993. Cittadinanza: una nuova agenda per il cambiamento. Sociologia del diritto, 1, 7–18.
Deriu, F., and Bucco, G., 2013. Il social cohousing: una risposta innovativa alle incertezze presenti e future dei giovani in Italia. Sociologia urbana e rurale [online], 100, 74–91. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3280/SUR2013-100006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/SUR2013-100006
Dussel, E.D., Krauel, J., and Tuma, V.C., 2000. Europe, Modernity, and Eurocentrism. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(3), 465–478.
Foucault, M., 1995. Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
Glaeser, E., 2020. Cities and Pandemics Have a Long History. City Journal, 325.
Guha, R., ed., 1982. Subaltern Studies I: Writings on South Asian History and Society. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Habermas, J., 1996. Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J., 2001. Morale, Diritto, Politica. Turin: Comunità.
Jacobs, J., 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
Komninou, E., 2022. Is COVID-19 going to change our relationship with space? A paradigm from Greece. plaNext – next generation planning [online], 12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/83 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/83
Lefebvre, H., 1967. Le droit à la ville [online]. Paris: Anthropos. https://doi.org/10.3406/homso.1967.1063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/homso.1967.1063
Lefebvre, H., 1974. La production de l’espace [online]. Paris: Anthropos. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3406/homso.1974.1855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/homso.1974.1855
Maffesoli, M., 2006. Du nomadisme: Vagabondages initiatiques. Paris: La Table Ronde.
Marci, T., 2003. La società e lo straniero. Per un diritto ospitale nell’età della globalizzazione. Milan: Franco Angeli.
Marci, T., 2009. Esilio ed estraniazione. Parolechiave, 41, 55–86.
Matthew, R.A., and McDonald, B., 2006. Cities under Siege: Urban Planning and the Threat of Infectious Disease. Journal of the American Planning Association [online], 72(1), 109–117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976728
Merleau-Ponty, M., 2009. Fenomenologia della percezione. Milan: Bompiani.
Minkowski, E., 2004. Il tempo vissuto. Fenomenologia e psicopatologia. Turin: Einaudi.
Parmet, W.E., and Rothstein, M.A., 2018. The 1918 influenza pandemic: Lessons learned and not. American Journal of Public Health [online], 108(11), 1435–1436. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304695 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304695
Perini, L., 2020. Housing collaborativo e prospettive creative: scenari per la città a venire. Scienze del territorio [online], 186–193. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13128/sdt-12354
Quijano, A., and Ennis, M., 2000. Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South [online], 1(3), 533–580. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
Rancière, J., 1998. Aux bords du politique. Paris: La Fabrique.
Santos, B.S, 2016. Epistemologies of the South. Justice against Epistemicide. New York: Routledge.
Sennett, R., 2018. Building and Dwelling: Ethics for the City. London: Allen Lane.
Sharifi, A., and Khavarian-Garmsir, A.R., 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on cities and major lessons for urban planning, design, and management. Science of The Total Environment [online], vol. 749. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391
Spivak, G.C., 1988. Can the subaltern speak? In: P. Williams and L. Chrisman, eds., Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory. A Reader. New York: Columbia University Press, 66–111.
Virilio, P., 1998. Lo spazio critico. Bari: Dedalo.
Weber, M., 1978. Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Weber, M., 2004. Science as a Vocation. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Marina Ciampi, Tito Marci
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
