Objective interpretation as conforming interpretation

Authors

  • Lidka Rodak University of Silesia

Keywords:

Dispute resolution, Conforming interpretation, objective interpretation, objectivity in legal discourse

Abstract

The practical discourse willingly uses the formula of “objective interpretation”, with no regards to its controversial nature that has been discussed in literature.

The main aim of the article is to investigate what “objective interpretation” could mean and how it could be understood in the practical discourse, focusing on the understanding offered by judicature.

The thesis of the article is that objective interpretation, as identified with textualists’ position, is not possible to uphold, and should be rather linked with conforming interpretation. And what this actually implies is that it is not the virtue of certainty and predictability – which are usually associated with objectivity- but coherence that makes the foundation of applicability of objectivity in law.

What could be observed from the analyses, is that both the phenomenon of conforming interpretation and objective interpretation play the role of arguments in the interpretive discourse, arguments that provide justification that interpretation is not arbitrary or subjective. With regards to the important part of the ideology of legal application which is the conviction that decisions should be taken on the basis of law in order to exclude arbitrariness, objective interpretation could be read as a question “what kind of authority “supports” certain interpretation”? that is almost never free of judicial creativity and judicial activism.

One can say that, objective and conforming interpretation are just another arguments used in legal discourse.

DOWNLOAD THIS PAPER FROM SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1989891

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Views 516
Downloads:
PDF 137


Downloads

How to Cite

Rodak, L. (2012) “Objective interpretation as conforming interpretation”, Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 1(9), p. 11. Available at: https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/172 (Accessed: 22 November 2024).

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 9 (2011): Autonomy and Heteronomy of the Judiciary in Europe

Section

Ensuring legitimacy: conform interpretation

License

OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.

The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.

For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.

The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.