"How exactly is it done here?" Conducting cross-jurisdictional research with judges and court staff

Authors

  • Paula Hannaford-Agor National Center for State Courts

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1702

Keywords:

multijurisdictional research, court organization, court governance, data quality

Abstract

The legal, political, and organizational environment in which judges and court staff work affects their performance in significant ways.  To ensure that researchers control for these effects, it is critical that they take sufficient time in the research design phase to identify relevant factors that might complicate their analyses or distort the interpretation of research findings.  This article highlights common challenges of multijurisdictional research, including inconsistent use of terminology, differing organizational structures and procedures, and exogenous factors such as court governance, policymaking authority, funding, and local court culture.  It also offers guidance to researchers on identifying and integrating these factors into their analyses to enhance the validity and utility of research findings. 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

        Metrics

Views 266
Downloads:
13(S1)_Hannaford_Agor_OSLS 203
XML_13(S1)_Hannaford_Agor_OSLS 3


References

Church, T.A., et al., 1978. Justice Delayed: The Pace of Litigation in Urban Trial Courts [online]. Williamsburg: National Center for State Courts. Available at: https://ncsc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ctadmin/id/0/.

Court Statistics Project, 2020. Trial Court Aggregation (2020 Update) [online]. Williamsburg: National Center for State Courts. Available at: https://www.courtstatistics.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/23833/CSP-Aggregation-Aug-2020.pdf#:~:text=Single%2Dtiered%20state%20courts%20(sometimes,Northern%20Mariana%20Islands%2C%20and%20Vermont

Court Statistics Project, 2023. CSP STAT [online]. Williamsburg: National Center for State Courts. Available at: https://www.courtstatistics.org/court-statistics/interactive-caseload-data-displays/csp-stat

Elek, J., 2022. Engaging courts & judicial professionals in research. Paper presented at the workshop on Empirical Research with Judicial Officers and Courts: Methods and Practices. Oñati: IISL, 23-24 June.

Hannaford-Agor, P., 2019. Caseload Highlights: The Landscape of Civil Litigation in State Courts: Examining Debt Collection, Landlord/Tenant and Small Claims Cases [online]. Williamsburg: National Center for State Courts. Available at: https://www.courtstatistics.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0027/53658/caseload-highlights.pdf

Hannaford-Agor, P., 2022. Our New Normal? How Covid-19 Accelerated Pre-Pandemic Trends in State Court Litigation. DePaul Law Review [online], 71(2), 801. Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol71/iss2/5

Hannaford-Agor, P., Graves S., and Spacek Miller, S., 2015. The Landscape of Civil Litigation in State Courts [online]. Williamsburg: National Center for State Courts. Available at: https://www.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/13376/civiljusticereport-2015.pdf

Mark, A., 2023. Perceptions of administrative policymaking authority: evidence from centralized and decentralized state court systems. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1706

McLuhan, Marshall and Fiore, Quentin, 1968. War and Peace in the Global Village. New York: Bantam Books.

Nagel, S.S., 1973. Comparing Elected and Appointed Judicial Systems. Beverly Hills: Sage.

National Center for State Courts, 2021. National Open Court Data Standards [online]. Williamsburg: National Center for State Courts. Available at: https://www.ncsc.org/services-and-experts/areas-of-expertise/court-statistics/national-open-court-data-standards-nods

Opeskin, B., 2023. Lazy Data? Using Administrative Records in Research on Judicial Systems. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1624

Ostrom, B., et al., 2005. Court Cultures and Their Consequences. Court Manager [online], 20(1). Available at: https://ncsc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/ctadmin/id/986/

Soltoff, B.C., 2015. Agenda-setting in state courts of last resort [online]. Doctoral Dissertation. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University. Available at: https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/files/final_submissions/10993

State Court Organization, 2022. State Court Structures [online]. Williamsburg: National Center for State Courts. Available at: https://cspbr.azurewebsites.net/

Van Zyl Smit, J., 2015. The Appointment, Tenure, and Removal of Judges under Commonwealth Principles: A Compendium and Analysis of Best Practice. Report of Research Undertaken by Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law.

Virginia’s Judicial System, 2021. The Circuit Court [online]. Informational Pamphlet. Richmond. Available at: https://www.vacourts.gov/courts/circuit/circuitinfo.pdf

Weiss, C.W., 2019. Judges can’t use taxpayer funds to sue clerk in paper-files dispute, state supreme court rules. ABA Journal [online], 9 August. Available at: https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/judges-cant-use-taxpayer-funds-to-sue-clerk-in-paper-files-dispute-state-supreme-court-rules

Published

21-07-2023 — Updated on 20-12-2023

How to Cite

Hannaford-Agor, P. (2023) “"How exactly is it done here?" Conducting cross-jurisdictional research with judges and court staff”, Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 13(S1), pp. S102-S120. doi: 10.35295/osls.iisl.1702.