Intervention in family conflicts through mediation from the comparative perspective of Brazil and Portugal legislation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1319Keywords:
Family conflicts, Mediation, Comparative, Brazil, PortugalAbstract
The jurisdictional function of a country plays an important role in the resolution of family conflicts, causing a high number of lawsuits. However, the ability to resolve conflicts of this nature is not exclusive to the judiciary, it being possible for other ways, with help of a third party other than the State. Given the growing number of disputes that can be resolved extra judicially, the need for more investment in the development of other means of conflict resolution, such as mediation, to achieve social peace remains evident. This article aims to compare some aspects of mediation in Brazil and Portugal, seeking to focus especially on family conflicts, investigating similarities, equivalences and differences between the family mediation guiding principles in Brazil and Portugal. For this effect, it was privileged bibliographical and legislative research, with qualitative comparative analysis, which led to the conclusion that, despite the differences, the two diplomas are very similar, showing equivalences and few absences, which do not compromise the basis of mediation.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF_12_4_Coelho_et_al_OSLS 324
XML_12_4_Coelho_et_al_OSLS 59
References
Azevedo, A.G., ed., 2016. Manual da Mediação Judicial [online]. Brasilia: Comitê gestor nacional da conciliação, Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Available from: https://www.cnj.jus.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/f247f5ce60df2774c59d6e2dddbfec54.pdf [Accessed 29 September 2021].
Brown, H.J., and Marriott, A.L., 2005. ADR principles and practice. London: Thomson, Sweet & Maxwell.
Cabral, T.N.X., 2017. A evolução da conciliação e da mediação no Brasil. Revista FONAMEC [online], 1(1), 354–369. Available from: https://www.emerj.tjrj.jus.br/revistas/fonamec/volumes/volumeI/revistafonamec_numero1volume1_368.pdf [Accessed 3 January 2022].
Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ), 2010. Resolução n° 125/2010 [online]. 29 November 2010. Available from: https://atos.cnj.jus.br/files/resolucao_125_29112010_03042019145135.pdf [Accessed 29 September 2021].
Cruz, R.M., 2018. A mediação familiar como meio complementar de justiça. Coimbra: Almedina.
Flandrin, J.L., 1991. Famílias: parentesco, casa e sexualidade na sociedade antiga. 2nd ed. Lisbon: Estampa.
Jerónimo, M., 2018. Reflexão sobre a Constitucionalidade da Mediação Pré-processual Obrigatória. Revista electrónica de direito [online], 16(2), 111–127 Available from: https://cije.up.pt/pt/red/edicoes-anteriores/2018-nordm-2/reflexao-sobre-a-constitucionalidade-da-mediacao-pre-processual-obrigatoria/ [Accessed 18 December 2021].
Lopes, D., and Patrão, A., 2016. Lei da Mediação comentada. Coimbra: Almedina.
Pinto-Ferreira, J. P., 2018. Mediação: Legislação e regulamentação consolidadas [online]. Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Available from: https://laboratorioral.fd.unl.pt/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Media%C3%A7%C3%A3o-Legisla%C3%A7%C3%A3o-e-regulamenta%C3%A7%C3%A3o-consolidadas.pdf [Accessed 18 July 2022].
Roberts, M., 2014. Mediation in family disputes. Principles of practices. 1st ed. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Rothenburg, W.C., 2008. Igualdade material e discriminação positiva: O princípio da isonomia, Novos Estudos Jurídicos [online], 13(2), 77–92. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14210/nej.v13n2.p77-92 [Accessed 18 July 2022].
Severino, R., 2012. As rupturas conjugais e as responsabilidades parentais: Mediação familiar em Portugal. Lisbon: Universidade Católica Editora.
Silva, F.R.A., 2016. O modelo brasileiro de defensoria pública e a proteção jurídica portuguesa – semelhanças e diferenças no serviço de assistência jurídica. Revista jurídica luso-brasileira [online], 2(3), 541–569. Available from: https://www.cidp.pt/revistas/rjlb/2016/3/2016_03_0541_0569.pdf [Accessed 3 January 2022].
Silva, J.M. da, 2016. A família das crianças na separação dos pais. Forte da Casa: Petrony.
Simmel, G., 1983. A natureza sociológica do conflito. In: E.M. Filho, ed., Sociologia. São Paulo: Ática.
Takahashi, B., et al., 2019. Manual de Mediação e Conciliação da Justiça Federal [online]. Brasilia: Conselho da Justiça Federal. Available from: https://www.cjf.jus.br/cjf/corregedoria-da-justica-federal/centro-de-estudos-judiciarios-1/publicacoes-1/outras-publicacoes/manual-de-mediacao-e-conciliacao-na-jf-versao-online.pdf [Accessed 29 September 2021].
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Kelly Coelho Silva, Rossana Cruz, Gilsilene Passon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
