“Just in case”

Too much litigation?

Authors

  • Eyal Katvan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1186

Keywords:

Access to justice, litigation, court, judges, lawyers, the legal profession, judgements

Abstract

This Oñati Socio-Legal Series publication is the product of an Oñati workshop on Too much litigation, held June 2019. This is the third and final part of a trilogy of workshops held in Oñati; the first two parts dealt with the legal professionals: lawyers (Oñati workshop 2012, titled Too Many Lawyers?); and judges (Oñati workshop 2016, titled Too Few Judges?). In this final workshop, we focused on litigants and litigation – the “clients” of both judges and lawyers. The overall finding is that too much/not enough litigation might endanger access to justice. In a wider context, putting the three themes together creates a better understanding of the importance of access to justice and the role of the legal profession and the professionals in ensuring this basic right.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

        Metrics

Views 368
Downloads:
PDF 281
XML 14


Downloads

Published

27-05-2024

How to Cite

Katvan, E. (2024) “‘Just in case’: Too much litigation?”, Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 11(2), pp. 315–320. doi: 10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1186.