What is a “case”?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1149Keywords:
Litigation, case, dispute processing, courts, claims, Litigio, caso, proceso de disputas, tribunales, demandasAbstract
This article interrogates the concept of a “case” in court, in an effort to clarify underlying concerns in debates over whether there is “too much” or “too little” litigation. One perspective on litigation takes a bottom-up view, examining the considerations and motives of disputing parties who file civil claims. This perspective includes theories about litigation and social structure, economics, dispute transformation, political participation, and psychology. An alternative top-down view examines litigation from the perspective of government, including its interest in dispute resolution, social control, and institutional capacities of courts. The article reviews and critiques existing literature on these perspectives and concludes with the importance of integrating them.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF 381
XML 151
References
Alter, K., and Vargas, J., 2000. Explaining variation in the use of European litigation strategies: European Community law and British gender equality policy. Comparative Political Studies [online], 33(4), 452–482. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414000033004002 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Baum, L., 2011. Specializing the Courts. University of Chicago Press.
Becker, H., 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. Chicago University Press.
Black, D., 1976. The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.
Blackstone, A., Uggen, C., and McLaughlin, H., 2009. Legal consciousness and responses to sexual harassment. Law and Society Review [online], 43(3), 631–666. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00384.x [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Bohannan, P., 1965. The differing realms of law. American Anthropologist [online], 67(6), 33–42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1965.67.6.02a00930 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Cain, M., 1979. The general practice lawyer and the client: towards a radical conception. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 7, 331.
Cicourel, A., 1968. The Social Organization of Juvenile Justice. New York: Wiley.
Coates, D., and Penrod, S., 1981. Social psychology and the emergence of disputes. Law and Society Review [online], 15(3–4), 655–680. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053506 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Cooter, R.D., and Rubinfeld, D.L., 1990. Trial courts: An economic perspective. Law and Society Review [online], 24(2), 533–546. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053694 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Daniels, S., 1990. Caseload dynamics and the nature of change: The civil business of trial courts in four Illinois counties. Law and Society Review [online], 24(2), 299–320. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053680 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Engel, D.M., 1984. The oven bird’s song: Insiders, outsiders, and personal injuries in an American Community. Law and Society Review [online], 18(4), 551–582. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053447 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Engel, D.M., 2016. The Myth of the Litigious Society: Why we Don’t Sue. Chicago University Press.
Engel, D.M., and Munger, F.W., 2003. Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities. University of Chicago Press.
Ewick, P., and Silbey, S.S., 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. University of Chicago Press.
Feeley, M.M., and Rubin, E., 1998. Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America’s Prisons. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Felstiner, W.L.F., 1974. Influences of social organization on dispute processing. Law and Society Review [online], 9(1), 63. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053022 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Felstiner, W.L.F., Abel, R.L., and Sarat, A., 1981. The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming. Law and Society Review [online], 15(3–4), 631–654. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053505 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Friedman, L.M., 1983. Courts over time: A survey of theories and research. In: K.O. Boyum and L. Mather, eds., Empirical Theories About Courts. New York: Longman, 9–50.
Friedman, L.M., 1990. Opening the time capsule: A progress report on studies of courts over time. Law & Society Review [online], 24(2), 229–240. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053675 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Friedman, L.M., and Percival, R.V., 1976. A tale of two courts: Litigation in Alameda and San Benito counties. Law and Society Review [online], 10(2), 267. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053101 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Frohman, L., 1997. Convictability and discordant locales: reproducing race, class, and gender ideologies in prosecutorial decision-making. Law & Society Review [online], 31(3), 531–66. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3054045 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Galanter, M., 1974. Why the “Haves” comes out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law and Society Review [online], 9(1), 95–160. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053023 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Galanter, M., 1983. The Radiating Effects of Courts. In: K.O. Boyum and L. Mather, eds., Empirical Theories About Courts. New York: Longman, 117–142.
Galanter, M., 1990. Case congregations and their careers. Law and Society Review [online], 24(2), 371–395. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053686 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Genn, H., 1999. Paths to Justice. Oxford: Hart.
Gluckman, M., 1967. The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. Manchester University Press. (Originally published in 1955).
Granfield, R., and Mather, L., 2009. Pro bono, the public good, and the legal profession: An introduction. In: R. Granfield and L. Mather, eds., Private Lawyers and the Public Interest: The Evolving Role of Pro Bono in the Legal Profession. Oxford University Press, 1–22.
Gulliver, P.H., 1963. Social Control in an African society: A Study of the Arusha, Agricultural Masai of Northern Tanganyika. Boston University Press.
Haltom, W., and McCann, M., 2004. Distorting the Law: Politics, Media, and the Litigation Crisis. University of Chicago Press.
Harrington, C.B., 1985. Shadow Justice: The Ideology and Institutionalization of Alternatives to Court. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Hatcher, L., 2005. Economic Libertarians, property, and institutions: linking Activism, ideas, and identities among property rights advocates. In: A. Sarat and S. Scheingold, eds., The World Cause Lawyers Make. Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 112–146.
Hirschl, R., 2008. The judicialization of politics. In: K.E. Whittington, R.D. Kelemen and G.A. Caldeira, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics. Oxford University Press.
Horan, D.J., Grant, E.R., and Cunningham, P.C., eds., 1987. Abortion and the Constitution: Reversing Roe v Wade through the Courts. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Kagan, R.A., 2001. Adversarial Legalism: The American way of law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Katvan, E., and Shnoor, B., 2021. Don Quixote de la Corte: Serial Litigants, Emotions, and Access to Justice. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 11(this issue). Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1117 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Kidder, R., 1975. Afterword: Change and structure in dispute processing. Law & Society Review [online], 9(2), 385. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3052983 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Kluger, R., 1975. Simple Justice. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Krislov, S., 1983. Theoretical perspectives on case load studies: A critique and a beginning, In: K.O. Boyum and L. Mather, eds., Empirical Theories About Courts. New York: Longman, 161–187.
Kritzer, H.M., 2004. Risks, Reputations, and Rewards: Contingency Fee Legal Practice in the United States. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Kritzer, H.M., 2011, The antecedents of disputes: Complaining and claiming. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 1(6), 1–31. Available from: http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/viewFile/53/225 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
LaFave, W., 1965. Arrest: The Decision to Take a Suspect into Custody. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
Lahav, A., 2017. In Praise of Litigation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Legal case, 2021. Wikipedia [online], 3 January. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_case [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Levin, A., and Alkoby, A., 2021. More lawyers, more litigation? Exploring trends in litigation and the legal profession in Ontario, Canada. Oñati Socio-Legal Series [online], 11(this issue). Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1118 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Levy, A., 2013. The perfect wife. The New Yorker, 30 September, 54–63.
Macaulay, S., 1963. Non-Contractual relations in business: A preliminary study. American Sociological Review [online], 28(1), 55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/2090458 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Marshall, A., 2003. Injustice frames, legality, and the everyday construction of sexual harassment. Law and Social Inquiry [online], 28(3), 659–689. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2003.tb00211.x [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Mather, L., 1998. Theorizing trial courts: Lawyers, policymaking, and tobacco litigation. Law and Social Inquiry [online], 23(4), 897–940. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1998.tb00037.x [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Mather, L., 2009. Lawyers and Solicitors Separated by a Common Legal System: Anti-Tobacco Litigation in the United States and Britain. In: D.M. Engel and M. McCann, eds., Fault Lines: Tort Law as Cultural Practice. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Mather, L., 2018. Client selection: How lawyers reflect and influence community values. In: M.N. Trautner, ed., Insiders, Outsiders, & Law [online]. Cambridge University Press, 82–97. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979716.006 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Mather, L., and Yngvesson, B., 1981. Language, audience, and the transformation of disputes. Law and Society Review [online], 15(3–4), 775–821. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053512 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Mather, L., and Yngvesson, B., 2015. Disputes, social construction and transformation of. In: J.D. Wright, ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. [online]. Elsevier, 560–566. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86024-9 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
McIntosh, W., 1981. 150 Years of litigation and dispute settlement: a court tale. Law and Society Review [online], 15(3–4), 823–848. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053513 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Menkel-Meadow, C., 1984. Toward another view of legal negotiation: The structure of problem solving. UCLA Law Review, 31, 754–842.
Merry, S.E., 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. University of Chicago Press.
Miller, R.E., and Sarat, A., 1981. Grievances, claims, and disputes: Assessing the adversary culture. Law and Society Review [online], 15(3–4), 525–565. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053502 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Moustafa, T., and Ginsburg, T., 2008. Introduction: The functions of courts in authoritarian politics. In: T. Ginsburg and T. Moustafa, eds., Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge University Press.
Munger, F., 1988. Tort litigation and social change: accidents and trial court litigation in West Virginia, 1870–1940. Buffalo Law Review [online], 36, 301. Available from: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1716&context=fac_articles_chapters [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Munger, F., ed., 1990. Special Issue: Longitudinal Studies of Trial Courts. Law and Society Review [online], 24(2). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i354551 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Murayama, M., 2012, Reconsidering the Japanese way of dispute resolution: What it is and why. In: H.N. Scheiber and T. Ginsburg, eds., Japanese Legal System: An Era of Transition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 66–87.
Nader, L., 1969 Styles of Court Procedure: To make the balance. In: L. Nader, ed., Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.
Nader, L., and Todd, H.F., eds., 1978. The Disputing Process: Law in Ten Societies. New York: Columbia Press.
Peel, P., 2017. Renewing the longitudinal study of trial courts. Justice Systems Journal [online], 38(3), 290–305. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2017.1306816 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
PON staff, 2019. What is the Multi-Door Courthouse Concept. Program on negotiation, Harvard Law School [online], 22 August. Blog post. Available from: https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/international-negotiation-daily/a-discussion-with-frank-sander-about-the-multi-door-courthouse/ [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Reed, D.S., 2001. On Equal Terms: The Constitutional Politics of Educational Opportunity. Princeton University Press.
Rosenberg, G.N., 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? University of Chicago Press.
Santos, B.S., 1977. The law of the oppressed: The construction and reproduction of legality in Pasargada. Law & Society Review [online], 12, 5–126. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053321 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Sarat, A., and Grossman, J., 1975. Courts and conflict resolution: Problems in the mobilization of adjudication. American Political Science Review [online], 69, 1200. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/1955281 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Sarat, A., and Scheingold, S., eds., 1998. Cause Lawyering. Oxford University Press.
Shapiro, M., 1980. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Shapiro, M., 1993. The globalization of law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 1(1), 37–64.
Skogan, W., 1984. Reporting crime to the police: the status of world research. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency [online], 2, 113–137. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427884021002003 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Stone, D., 2020. Counting: How We Use Numbers to Decide What Matters. New York: Livewright.
Toharia, J.J., 1974. Cambio social y vida jurídica en España. Madrid: Edicusa.
van Loon, F., and Langerwerf, E., 1990. Socioeconomic development and the evolution of litigation rates of civil courts in Belgium, 1835–1980. Law and Society Review [online], 24(2), 283–298. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053679 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Vidmar, N., and Schuller, R.A., 1987. Individual differences and the pursuit of legal rights. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 299–317.
Vose, C., 1959. Caucasians Only: The Supreme Court, the NAACP, and the Restrictive Covenant Cases. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wilson, J.Q., 1968. Varieties of Police Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wollschläger, C., 1990. Civil litigation and modernization: The work of the municipal courts of Bremen, Germany, in five centuries, 1549–1984. Law and Society Review [online], 24(2), 261–282. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053678 [Accessed 1 March 2021].
Yngvesson, B., 1985. Re-examining continuing relations and the law. Wisconsin Law Review, 1985(3), 623–646.
Yngvesson, B., 1993. Virtuous Citizens, Disruptive Subjects: Order and Complaint in a New England Court. New York: Routledge.
Yngvesson, B., and Mather, L. 1983. Courts, moots and the disputing process, In: K.O. Boyum and L. Mather, eds., Empirical Theories About Courts. New York: Longman, 51–83.
Zemans, F., 1983. The neglected role of law in the political system. American Political Science Review, 77(3), 690–703.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Lynn Mather
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
