Environmental resistance in the Anthropocene
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1048Keywords:
Ecological law, Indigenous law, environmental governance, AnthropoceneAbstract
Scientists describe the current “Anthropocene epoch” as one of profound anthropogenic disruptions in the ecosphere that place humanity at an unacceptable risk. This unprecedented ecological moment in human history is rooted in profoundly unsustainable patterns of production and consumption protected by liberal power structures expressed through law. The exigencies of the Anthropocene call us to expand the subjects of resistance to include future generations of humans, plants, non-human animals, ecosystems and “non-living” natural entities (such as water, air and climatic systems). Since these constituencies cannot resist in a socio-political sense, their representation in current socio-political systems will depend upon “an insurrection of subjugated knowledges” (Foucault 1980, p. 81) including Indigenous law, pre-modern holistic traditions of Western legal thought, and emerging theories of ecological law. This article will explore these approaches as possible paths forward in the Anthropocene, employing a comparative law perspective that considers relevant jurisprudence and policy developments from around the globe.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF 450
References
Atapattu, S., 2002. The Right to Life or the Right to Die Polluted?: The Emergence of a Human Right to a Healthy Environment Under International Law. Tulane Environmental Law Journal [online], 16(1), 65–126. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43292777 [Accessed 11 December 2018].
Bakht, N., and Collins, L., 2017. The Earth is Our Mother: Freedom of Religion and the Preservation of Aboriginal Sacred Sites in Canada. McGill Law Journal [online], 62(3), 777–812. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7202/1042774ar [Accessed 11 December 2018].
Blackstone, W., 1759. The Great Charter and Charter of the Forest. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Borrows, J., 1996. With or Without You: First Nations Law (in Canada). McGill Law Journal [online], 41, 629–665. Available from: https://www.aboriginallegal.ca/assets/withorwithoutyou.pdf [Accessed 11 December 2018].
Borrows, J., 1997. Living Between Water and Rocks: First Nations, Environmental Planning, and Democracy. University of Toronto Law Journal [online], 47(4), 417–468. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/825948 [Accessed 11 December 2018].
Borrows, J., 2010. Canada’s Indigenous Constitution. University of Toronto Press.
Bosselmann, K., and Taylor, P., 2017. Ecological Approaches to Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Boyd, D.R., 2003. Unnatural Law: Rethinking Canadian Environmental Law and Policy. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Boyd, D.R., 2004. Sustainability Law: (R)evolutionary Directions for the Future of Environmental Law. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 14, 357–385.
Boyd, D.R., 2012a. The Environmental Rights Revolution: A Global Study of Constitutions, Human Rights, and the Environment. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Boyd, D.R., 2012b. The Right to a Healthy Environment. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Burton, L., 2002. Worship and Wilderness: Culture, Religion, and Law in Public Lands Management. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Capra, F., and Mattei, U., 2015. The Ecology of Law: Towards a Legal System in Tune with Nature and Community. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler.
Collins, L., 2007. Tort, Democracy and Environmental Governance: Crown Liability for Environmental Non-Enforcement. Tort Law Review, 15(2), 107–126.
Collins, L.M., 2013. Security of the person, peace of mind: a precautionary approach to environmental uncertainty. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 4(1), 79–100.
Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund, 2018. Advancing Legal Rights of Nature: Timeline [online]. Available from: https://celdf.org/rights/rights-of-nature/rights-nature-timeline/ [Accessed 14 July 2018].
Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador, 2008 [online]. Article 71. Available from: http://pdba.georgetown.edu/Constitutions/Ecuador/english08.html [Accessed 14 July 2018].
Cullinan, C., 2011. Wild Law: A Manifesto for Earth Justice. 2nd ed. White River Junction: Chelsea Green.
Daly, E., 2012. The Ecuadorian Exemplar: The First Ever Vindications of Constitutional Rights of Nature. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law [online], 21(1), 63–66. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2012.00744.x [Accessed 11 December 2018].
Daly, E., and May, J.R., 2014. Global Environmental Constitutionalism. Cambridge University Press.
Dauncey, G., 2009. The Climate Challenge: 101 Solutions to Global Warming. Gabriola: New Society.
Davies, J., 2016. The Birth of the Anthropocene. Oakland: University of California Press.
de Bracton, H., 1968. On the Laws and Customs of England (vol. 2). Cambridge: Belknap Press, 39–40.
de Lucia, V., 2017. Critical Environmental Law and the Double Register of the Anthropocene: A Biopolitical Reading. In: L.J. Kotzé, ed., Environmental Law and Governance for the Anthropocene. Oxford: Hart, 97–116.
Ecological Law & Governance Association, 2016. Oslo Manifesto for Ecological Law and Governance [online]. Available from: https://www.elga.world/oslo-manifesto/ [Accessed 13 July 2018].
Edwards, L., 2015. What is the Anthropocene? Eos [online], 30 November. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1029/2015EO040297 [Accessed 8 July 2018].
Fitzmaurice, M., Ong, D., and Merkouris, P., eds., 2010. Research Handbook on International Environmental Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Foucault, M. (with C. Gordon, ed.,) 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Trans.: C. Gordon et al. New York: Pantheon Books.
Francis, the Holy Father, 2015. Encyclical Letter on Care for Our Common Home [online]. Available from: http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html [Accessed 14 July 2018].
Frome Town Council, 2016. River Frome and Rodden Meadow Byelaw [online]. Available from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qnnpA3A2sEKamJ6yJQPKO99e1F3JuFU9/view [Accessed 14 July 2018].
Garver, G., 2013. The Rule of Ecological Law: The Legal Complement to Degrowth Economics. Sustainability [online], 5(1), 316–337. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su5010316 [Accessed 11 December 2018].
Gellers, J., 2015. The Global Emergence of Constitutional Environmental Rights. London: Routledge.
Goldman, M., 2001. Constructing an Environmental State: Ecogovernmentality and other transnational practices of a “green” World Bank. Social Problems, 48(4), 499–523.
Hartman, S., ed., 2017. Contesting Environmental Imaginaries: Nature and Counternature in a Time of Global Change. Leiden: Brill/Rodopi.
Hawken, P., 2008. Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Social Movement in History is Restoring Grace, Justice and Beauty to the World. New York: Penguin.
Hay, P.R., 2002. Main Currents in Western Environmental Thought. Sydney: UNSW Press.
International Commission on Stratigraphy, 2016. International Chronostratigraphic Chart [online]. Available from: http://www.stratigraphy.org/index.php/ics-chart-timescale [Accessed 26 April 2016].
Jones, P., and Pennick, N., 1995. A History of Pagan Europe. New York: Routledge.
Kotzé, L.J., 2012. Global Environmental Governance: Law and Regulation for the 21st Century. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Kotzé, L.J., 2014. Rethinking Global Environmental Law and Governance in the Anthropocene. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law [online], 32(2), 121–156. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2014.11435355 [Accessed 11 December 2018].
Lindberg, T., 2015. Critical Indigenous Legal Theory Part I: The Dialogue Within. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law [online], 27(2), 224–247. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.27.2.224 [Accessed 11 December 2018].
Little Bear, L., 1996. Relationship of Aboriginal People to the Land and the Aboriginal Perspective on Aboriginal Title. For Seven Generations: An Information Legacy of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. [CD-ROM]. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services.
M’Gonigle, M., and Takeda, L., 2013. The Liberal Limits of Environmental Law: A Green Legal Critique. Pace Environmental Law Review [online], 30(3), 1005–1115 at 1020. Available from: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pelr/vol30/iss3/4 [Accessed 11 December 2018].
MacGrady, G.J., 1975. The Navigability Concept in the Civil and Common Law: Historical Development, Current Importance, and Some Doctrines That Don’t Hold Water. Florida State University Law Review [online], 3(4), 511–615. Available from: http://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol3/iss4/1 [Accessed 11 December 2018].
Magallanes, C.I., 2015. Maori Cultural Rights in Aotearoa New Zealand: Protecting the Cosmology that Protects the Environment. Widener Law Review [online], 21(2), 273–327. Available from: http://widenerlawreview.org/files/2008/10/15-Magallanes.pdf [Accessed 11 December 2018].
McNeill, J.R., 2000. Something New Under the Sun: An Environmental History of the Twentieth-Century World. New York: WW Norton & Co.
Menon, M., 2015. India’s First Environmental Referendum: How Tribal People Protected the Environment. Environmental Law Reporter [online], 45(7), 10656–10658. Available from: https://elr.info/news-analysis/45/10656/indias-first-environmental-referendum-how-tribal-people-protected-environment [Accessed 11 December 2018].
Narain, U., and Greenspan Bell, R., 2005. Who Changed Delhi’s Air? The Roles of the Court and the Executive in Environmental Policymaking. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Orebech, P., et al., 2005. The Role of Customary Law in Sustainable Development. Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, B.J., 2009. The Ties that Bind: Indigenous Peoples and Environmental Governance. In: B.J. Richardson, S. Imai and K. McNeil, eds., Indigenous Peoples and the Law: Comparative and Critical Perspectives. Oxford: Hart, 337–370.
Ross, M.L., 2005. First Nations Sacred Sites in Canada’s Courts. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Roy, E.A., 2017. New Zealand river granted same legal rights as human being. The Guardian [online], 16 March. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/16/new-zealand-river-granted-same-legal-rights-as-human-being [Accessed 14 July 2018].
Simons, P., and Macklin, A., 2014. The Governance Gap: Extractive Industries, Human Rights, and the Home State Advantage. Oxford: Routledge.
Te Urewera Act 2014 (2014 No. 51) (New Zealand) [online]. Available from: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2014/0051/latest/whole.html [Accessed 14 July 2018].
Thornton, J., 2000. Pandora’s Poison: Chlorine, Health, and a New Environmental Strategy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
United Nations Environment Programme, 2012. Global environment outlook GEO 5: Environment for the Future We Want [online]. Report. Nairobi: UNEP. Available from: http://www.unep.org/geo/ [Accessed 11 December 2018].
United Nations Environment Programme, 2015. Multiple Pathways to Sustainable Development: Initial Findings from the Global South [online]. Nairobi: UNEP. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1986MultiplePathwaysSustainableDevelopment.pdf [Accessed 11 December 2018].
Valdivia, G., 2015. Eco-governmentality. In: T.A. Perreault, G. Bridge and J.P. McCarthy, eds., The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology. Florence, KY: Taylor & Francis, 467–480.
Verschuuren, B., et al., eds., 2010. Sacred Natural Sites: Conserving Nature and Culture [online]. London/Washington, DC: Earthscan. Available from: https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2010-045.pdf [Accessed 11 December 2018].
Wacke, A., 2002. Protection of the Environment in Roman Law? Roman Legal Tradition [online], 1, 1–24. Available from: https://romanlegaltradition.org/contents/2002/RLT-WACKE1.PDF [Accessed 11 December 2018].
Waters, C.N., et al., 2016. The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science [online], 351(6269), aad2622. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2622 [Accessed 11 December 2018].
Weston, B.H., and Bollier, D., 2013. Green Governance: Ecological Survival, Human Rights, and the Law and the Commons. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, P., 2017. Factum of the Intervenor, Passamaquoddy Nation at Schoodic. Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia (Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations) [2017] 2 SCR 386 (Supreme Court of Canada) [online]. Available from: https://www.scc-csc.ca/WebDocuments-DocumentsWeb/36664/FM130_Intervener_Council-of-the-Passamaquoddy-Nation-at-Schoodic.pdf [Accessed 17 December 2018].
Wood, M.C., 2009. Advancing the Sovereign Trust of Government to Safeguard the Environment for Present and Future Generations (Part I). Environmental Law [online], 39(1), 43–90. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1946078 [Accessed 11 December 2018].
Wood, M.C., 2013. Nature’s Trust: Environmental Law for a New Ecological Age. Cambridge University Press.
Woolley, O., 2014. Ecological Governance: Reappraising Law’s Role in Protecting Ecosystem Functionality. Cambridge University Press.
Youngblood Henderson, J.S., Benson, M.L., and Findlay, I.H., 2000. Aboriginal Tenure in the Constitution of Canada. Toronto: Carswell.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Lynda M. Collins
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
