, National Center for State Courts, United States

• Oñati Socio-Legal Series Vol. 13 No. S1 (2023): Empirical research with judicial officers and courts: Methods and practices - Thematic Articles
  "How exactly is it done here?" Conducting cross-jurisdictional research with judges and court staff
  Abstract  13(S1)_Hannaford_Agor_OSLS  XML_13(S1)_Hannaford_Agor_OSLS
• Oñati Socio-Legal Series Vol. 4 No. 5 (2014): Evaluating Judicial Performance - Conceptual and methodological issues
  Methodologies for Measuring Judicial Performance: The Problem of Bias
  Abstract  PDF
• Oñati Socio-Legal Series Vol. 4 No. 5 (2014): Evaluating Judicial Performance - Empirical research findings
  Thinking about Judges and Judicial Performance: Perspective of the Public and Court Users
  Abstract  PDF
• Oñati Socio-Legal Series Vol. 7 No. 4 (2017): “Too Few Judges?” Regulating the Number of Judges in Society - Methodology, Data and Numbers: Too Few/Many/Much Judges
  Case Weighting as a Common Yardstick: A Comparative Review of Current Uses and Future Directions
  Abstract  PDF
• Oñati Socio-Legal Series Vol. 9 No. 5 (2019): Judging, Emotion and Emotion Work - Research Methods, Empirical Insights and [Changing] Judicial Practice
  Judicial Perspectives on Emotion, Emotion Management, and Judicial Excellence in the USA
  Abstract  PDF
• Oñati Socio-Legal Series Vol. 4 No. 5 (2014): Evaluating Judicial Performance - Introduction
  Evaluating Judicial Performance: Editors’ Introduction
  Abstract  PDF