Perpetrators or Preventers?
The Double Role of Corporations in Child Trafficking in a Global Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0919Keywords:
Child trafficking, Corporate liability, Exploitation, Corporate Social ResponsibilityAbstract
In recent years, the engagement of corporations in child trafficking has become a matter of growing importance. Many corporations have adopted global subcontracting systems and complex structures that boost their productivity and profits, but might also create more opportunities for trafficking and exploitation of both adults and children. Taking this context into account, the ways in which corporations can commit child trafficking will be explored and exemplified to highlight their diversity. This paper also offers a brief overview of the response given by international and European anti-trafficking instruments concerning corporate criminal liability for child trafficking. Moreover, the mechanisms adopted by some companies to prevent trafficking and promote transparency within their supply chains will also be addressed. Overall, this paper aims to illustrate the pivotal role of corporations from two perspectives: as potential perpetrators of this serious crime, and as necessary actors to prevent it.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads:
PDF 165
References
American Bar Association and Arizona State University, 2014. How do Fortune 100 Corporations Address Potential Links to Human Rights Violations in a Globally Integrated Economy? [online]. Research project, 2 June. Available from https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/human_rights/fortune_100_report_on_trafficking.authcheckdam.pdf [Accessed 5 January 2018].
Andrix. J., 2007. Negotiated Shame: An Inquiry into the Efficacy of Settlement in Imposing Publicity Sanctions on Corporations. Cardozo Law Review, 28 (4), 1857-1890.
Bang, N.J., 2013. Unmasking the Charade of the Global Supply Contract: A Novel Theory of Corporate Liability in Human Trafficking and Forced Labor Cases. Houston Journal of International law, 35 (2), 256-322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2149613
Bureau of International Labor Affairs of the United States Department of Labour, 2014. List of Good Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor. Washington, DC. Available from: https://www.dol.gov/ilab/reports/pdf/tvpra_report2014.pdf [Accessed 5 January 2017].
Byerly, T.B., 2012. Combating Modern Slavery: What Can Business Do? Journal of Leadership, Accountability & Ethics, 9 (5), 25-34.
California Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010 (SB-657) [online]. Available from: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=200920100SB657 [Accessed 4 December 2017].
Coffee, J.C., 1980. Corporate Crime and Punishment: a Non-Chicago View of the Economics and Criminal Sanctions. American Criminal Law Review, 17, 419-578.
Coon, K., et al., 2014. Managing Corporate Supply Chains: Challenges and Successes in the Fight to Combat Forced Labour and Human Trafficking [online]. White Paper. Chicago, IL: Baker McKenzie. Available from http://www.bakermckenzie.com/-/media/files/newsroom/2016/04/brochure_csb37264_amiller_gsc_1118_v2.pdf?la=en [Accessed 5 January 2018].
Council of Europe, 2005. Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings [also referred to as European Trafficking Convention]. Council of Europe Treaty Series - No. 197 [online]. Warsaw, 16 May. Available from: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/197 [Accessed 30 November 2017].
Council of Europe, 2007. Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse. Council of Europe Treaty Series [online], no. 201. Lanzarote, 25 October. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/1680084822 [Accessed 5 January 2018].
Daunis, R.A., 2010. Sobre la urgente necesidad de una tipificación autónoma e independiente de la trata de personas. InDret. Revista para el Análisis del Derecho, 1, 1-44.
Díaz Morgado, C.V., 2014. El Delito de Trata de Seres Humanos: Su Aplicación a la Luz del Derecho Internacional y Comunitario. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Law, University of Barcelona. Available from: http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/55268/1/CVDM_TESIS.pdf [Accessed 5 January 2018].
European Commission, 2012. The EU Strategy towards the Eradication of Trafficking in Human Beings 2012-2016 [online]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/anti-trafficking/sites/antitrafficking/files/eu_strategy_towards_the_eradication_of_trafficking_in_human_beings_2012-2016_1.pdf [Accessed 5 January 2018].
European Parliament and Council of the European Union, 2011. Directive 2011/36/EU of 5 April on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA [also referred to as EU Trafficking Directive]. Official Journal of the European Union [online], 15 April, L 101/1. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:101:0001:0011:EN:PDF [Accessed 3 January 2018].
Europol, 2011. Trafficking in Human Beings in the European Union [online]. Knowledge product. The Hague: Europol Public Information. Available from: https://www.europol.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/trafficking-in-human-beings-in-the-european-union-2011.pdf [Accessed 5 January 2018].
Feasley, A., 2016. Eliminating Corporate Exploitation: Examining Accountability Regimes as Means to Eradicate Forced Labor from Supply Chains. Journal of Human Trafficking, 2 (1), 15-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2016.1137194
Gallagher, A., 2010. The International Law of Human Trafficking. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761065
Gallagher, A.T., 2015. The Concept of “Exploitation” in the Trafficking in Persons Protocol [online]. Vienna: UNODC. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/documents/congress/background-information/Human_Trafficking/UNODC_2015_Issue_Paper_Exploitation.pdf [Accessed 5 January 2018].
George, E., and Smith, S., 2013. In Good Company: How Corporate Social Responsibility Can Protect Rights and Aid Efforts to End Child Sex Trafficking and Modern Slavery. New York University Journal of International Law and Politic, 46 (1), 55-113.
Gómez, T.M., 2015. Introducción a la responsabilidad de las personas jurídicas en el sistema español. 2nd ed. Cizur Menor: Aranzadi.
Gruner, R., 1993. Beyond Fines: Innovative Corporate Sentences under Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Washinton University Law Review, 71 (2), 261-328.
Hall, J., 2008. Primark faces customer exodus after BBC ‘child labour’ allegations. The Telegraph [online], 4 July. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/
/Primark-faces-customer-exodus-after-BBC-child-labour-allegations.html [Accessed 5 January 2018].
Härkönen, E., 2016. Corporate Liability and International Sex Tourism- with Special reference to the Regulation in the Nordic Countries. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 16 (3), 315-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2015.1108861
Hiscox, M., and Smyth, N.F.B., 2008. Is There Consumer Demand for Improved Labor Standards? Evidence from Field Experiments in Social Product Labeling. [online]. Harvard University, Department of Government. Available from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.423.6823&rep=rep1&type=pdf [Accessed 5 January 2018].
Hoff, S. (La Strada International) and McGauran, K. (SOMO), 2015. Engaging the Private Sector to End Human Trafficking. A resource Guide for NGOs [online]. Amsterdam: LaStrada International and SOMO, October. Available from: http://lastradainternational.org/lsidocs/3227-Resource%20Guide%20Egnaging%20the%20Private%20Sector%20to%20End%20Human%20Trafficking.pdf [Accessed 5 January 2018].
Human Trafficking Database of the University of Michigan Law School, n.d. United States v Kim et al. aka Jerry Svoronos. UNODC No.: USA108 [online]. UNODC Case Law Database. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/cld/case-law-doc/traffickingpersonscrimetype/usa/2007/united_states_v._kim_et_al_aka_jerry_svoronos.html?tmpl=old [Accessed 5 January 2018].
Hunter, P., and Kepes, Q., 2012. Human Trafficking & Global Supply Chains: A Background Paper [online]. Prepared for the expert meeting convened by the UN Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially women and children, Ms. Joy Ngozi Ezeilo. Ankara, 12 and 13 November. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Trafficking/Consultation/2012/BackgroundPaper.pdf [Accessed 5 January 2018].
International Cocoa Initiative, 2011. Cocoa Farming: An Overview [online]. Available from: http://www.cocoainitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/ECA_-_2011_-_Cocoa_Farming_an_overview.pdf [Accessed 5 January 2018].
International Labour Organization, 1930. Convention concerning Forced or Compulsory Labour, no. 29 [referred to as Forced Labour Convention] (online). Geneva: 14th ILC session, 28 June. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C029 [Accessed 15 December 2017].
International Labour Organization, 1997. Private Employment Agencies Convention (No. 181) [online]. Geneva: ILO General Conference, 85th session on 3 June. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:55:0::NO::P55_TYPE,P55_LANG,P55_DOCUMENT,P55_NODE:CON,en,C181,%2FDocument [Accessed 5 January 2018].
International Labour Organization, 2008. The Roles of Employers' Organizations, Businesses and Trade Unions in Combating Trafficking for Labour Explotation [online]. Background Paper. UN Global Initiative to Fight Human Trafficking: The Vienna forum to Fight Human Trafficking, 019 Workshop, 13-15 February 2008. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/documents/human-trafficking/2008/BP019TheRolesofEmployersOrganizationsILO.pdf [Accessed 8 January 2018].
International Labour Organization, 2012. Global Estimate of Forced Labour: Results and methodology. Geneva: International Labour Office of the ILO. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_norm/@declaration/documents/publication/wcms_182004.pdf [Accessed 8 January 2018].
International Labour Organization, 2014. Profits and Poverty: The Economics of Forced Labour [online]. Geneva: International Labour Office of the ILO. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---declaration/documents/publication/wcms_243391.pdf [Accessed 8 January 2018].
International Labour Organization, 2015. Combating forced labour: a handbook for employers and business [online]. 2nd ed. Geneva: ILO. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---declaration/documents/publication/wcms_101171.pdf [Accessed 8 January 2018].
International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour of the International Labour Organization, 2002. Every Child Counts. New global estimates on Child Labour [online]. Geneva: ILO. April. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/ipecinfo/product/download.do?type=document&id=742 [Accessed 15 December 2017].
International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour, 2008. Combating trafficking in children for labour exploitation. A resource kit for policy-makers and practitioners [online]. Geneva: ILO. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/y8hcfs52 [Accessed 15 December 2017].
Jägers, N., and Rijken, C., 2014. Prevention of Human Trafficking for Labor Exploitation: The Role of Corporations. Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, 12 (1), 47-73.
John Doe I v Nestle, USA, 10-56739. 9th Cir. Dec. 2013.
Kepes, Q., and Hunter, P., 2015. The Role of Recruitment Fees and Abusive and Fraudulent Recruitment Practices of Recruitment Agencies in Trafficking in Persons. Vienna: UNODC. Available from https://www.unodc.org/documents/human-trafficking/2015/Recruitment_Fees_Report-Final-22_June_2015_AG_Final.pdf [Accessed 8 January 2018].
Konov, J.I., 2011. Piercing the Veil's Effect on Corporate Human Rights Violations & International Corporate Crime (Human Trafficking, Slavery, etc). Paper prepared for presentation at the workshop Human Trafficking, International Crime and National Security: A Human Rights Perspective. MPRA, Munich Personal RePEc Archive [online], 30 October. Available from: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/35714/1/MPRA_paper_35714.pdf [Accessed 8 January 2018].
Levin, M.H., 1983. Corporate Probation Conditions: Judicial Creativity or Abuse of Discretion? Fordham Law Review, 52, 637-662.
Mehra, A., and Shay, K., 2015. Persisting Harm: Corporate Responsibility and Accountability for Modern Forms of Slavery [online]. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2635029 [Accessed 8 January 2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2635029
Modern Slavery Act 2015 [online]. Available from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/30/pdfs/ukpga_20150030_en.pdf [Accessed 5 January 2018].
Organisation for the Code of Conduct for the Protection of Children from Sexual Exploitation in Travel and Tourism, n.d. About [online]. Available from: http://www.thecode.org/about/ [Accessed 5 January 2018].
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, 2014. Ending Exploitation. Ensuring businesses do not contribute to Trafficking in Human Beings: duties of States and the Private Sector. Occasional Paper Series on Combating Trafficking on Human Beings [online], no.7. Vienna: OSCE, 3 November. Available from: http://www.osce.org/secretariat/126305 [Accessed 8 January 2018].
Overeem, P., and Theuws, M., 2014. Fact Sheet: Child Labour in the Textile & Garment Industry. Focus on the Role of Buying Companies [online]. Amsterdam: Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO), March. Available from: https://www.somo.nl/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Fact-Sheet-child-labour-Focus-on-the-role-of-buying-companies.pdf [Accessed 5 January 2018].
Parente, T.M., 2014. Human Trafficking: identifying forced labour in multinational corporations and the implications of liability. Brazilian Journal of International Law, 11 (1), 148-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v11i1.2762
Pierce, S.C., 2011. Turning a Blind Eye: Corporate Involvement in Modern Day Slavery. The Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 14, 577-600.
Shavers, A.W., 2012. Human trafficking, the rule of law and corporate social responsibility. South California Journal of International Law & Business [online], 9 (1), 39-88. Available from: http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/scjilb/vol9/iss1/6?utm_source=scholarcommons.sc.edu%2Fscjilb%2Fvol9%2Fiss1%2F6&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages [Accessed 8 January 2018].
Tamaș, A., et al., 2016. TRACE-ing Human Trafficking: Project Findings [online]. Report. TRafficking as A Criminal Enterprise (TRACE) project, 30 April. Available from: http://trilateralresearch.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/TRACE_D6.5_Final-Report.pdf [Accessed 8 January 2018].
U.S. Department of State, 2015. Trafficking in Persons Report. July 2015 [online]. Available from: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/245365.pdf [Accessed 8 January 2018].
U.S. Department of State, 2016. Trafficking in Persons Report. June 2016 [online]. Available from: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/258876.pdf [Accessed 8 January 2018].
UNICEF, 2008. Child Trafficking in Europe. A Broad Vision to Put children First [online]. Florence: UNICEF, Innocenti Research Centre. Available from: https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/ct_in_europe_full.pdf [Accessed 8 January 2018].
United Nations General Assembly, 1989. UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. UN Treaty Series [online], vol. 1577, p. 3. New York, 20 November. Available from: https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&lang=en [Accessed 8 January 2018].
United Nations General Assembly, 2000a. Optional protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict and on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography [online]. UN General Assembly Resolution A/RES/54/263 of 25 May. Available from: http://www.un-documents.net/a54r263.htm [Accessed 5 January 2018].
United Nations General Assembly, 2000b. Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime [referred to as Palermo Protocol]. UN General Assembly Resolution A/RES/55/25 of 15 November. New York: UN Treaty Series [online], vol. 2237, p. 319. Available from: https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/mtdsg/volume%20ii/chapter%20xviii/xviii-12-a.en.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2017].
United Nations General Assembly, 2000c. United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime [referred to as Palermo Convention or UNTOC] and the Protocols Thereto [referred to as Palermo Protocols] (online). New York: UN General Assembly, Resolution 55/25 of 15 November. Available from: http://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/UNTOC/Publications/TOC%20Convention/TOCebook-e.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2017].
United Nations Human Rights Council, 2013. Trafficking in persons, especially women and children: efforts to combat human trafficking in supply chains of businesses [online]. UN Human Rights Council, Resolution A/HRC/RES/23/5 of 13 June. Available from: http://repository.un.org/bitstream/handle/11176/303590/A_HRC_RES_23_5-EN.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y [Accessed 8 January 2018].
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2004. Legislative Guides for the Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols thereto. UN Publication Sales No. E.0000000 [online]. Vienna: Division for Treaty Affairs of the UNODC. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/legislative_guides/Legislative%20guides_Full%20version.pdf [Accessed 8 January 2018].
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2014. Global Report on Trafficking in Persons (Sales No. E.14.V.10) [online]. Vienna: UNDOC, November. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/glotip/GLOTIP_2014_full_report.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2017].
United States v Marvin Chavelle Epps. D.C. Cir. 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Silvia Rodríguez-López
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
OSLS strictly respects intellectual property rights and it is our policy that the author retains copyright, and articles are made available under a Creative Commons licence. The Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution No-Derivatives licence is our default licence, further details available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 If this is not acceptable to you, please contact us.
The non-exclusive permission you grant to us includes the rights to disseminate the bibliographic details of the article, including the abstract supplied by you, and to authorise others, including bibliographic databases, indexing and contents alerting services, to copy and communicate these details.
For information on how to share and store your own article at each stage of production from submission to final publication, please read our Self-Archiving and Sharing policy.
The Copyright Notice showing the author and co-authors, and the Creative Commons license will be displayed on the article, and you must agree to this as part of the submission process. Please ensure that all co-authors are properly attributed and that they understand and accept these terms.
