Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The Oñati Socio-Legal Series is an international peer-reviewed on-line journal which publishes work within the field of law and society. This is broadly defined to include work which makes a significant contribution to the understanding and analysis of law as a set of social institutions, processes, practices or techniques, using any methodologies and approaches from the social sciences and humanities. Publication can be in any language, though the main languages are English, Spanish and French. Articles should normally be of 8-15,000 words. However, shorter and longer work can be considered if the length is appropriate and justified.

 

Section Policies

Analysis of selected problems

Unchecked Open Submissions Unchecked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

General editors first check that the article meets the quality criteria specified in the Author Guidelines. If they do, the papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by two referees.

For publication arising from workshops, the workshop organizer(s) will act as Guest Editors, and they will be invited to propose selected papers or authors from the workshop to submit papers to OSLS. Editors-in-chief will assess the issue proposal and will decide whether it fits the criteria for publication in OSLS.

In regard to the review process, one referee will be nominated by the workshop organizer(s), and one or more by the OSLS editors-in-chief. For other papers, reviewers are nominated by the OSLS editors-in-chief, advised by the Editorial Board.

In order to guarantee cohesiveness, papers coming from workshops can be reviewed by workshop participants. This notwithstanding, papers must always undergo blind peer review.

Reviewers are asked to comment on the following aspects:

  1. Is the paper well organised and structured, does the argument flow well?
  2. Are sources adequately and properly cited, and are the language and expression clear, adequate and appropriate?
  3. Is the paper of sufficient interest and originality to be published in the Series?
  4. Do you have suggestions for revision of the paper:
    • (i) parts which could be shortened or deleted,
    • (ii) arguments or points that need clarification, expansion or development,
    • (iii) important and relevant views or work which the author should take into account, or
    • (iv) for reorganisation of the paper?
  5. Please state whether your suggestions are
    • (i) advice to the author and the paper could be published without checking the revised version
    • (ii) you have suggested specific changes which must be made but a non-specialist could check before publication that the changes have been made;
    • (iii) the paper should not be published unless the revised version is approved by you (or if you are not able or willing to read a revised version, please if possible suggest someone who could); or
    • (iv) the paper should not be published.

In the system, they must choose one of these options:

Accept submission ; Revisions required ; Resubmit for review; Resubmit elsewhere ; Decline submission ; See comments

In case of serious disagreement between reviewers, the editor may make a final decision or nominate a third reviewer.

Based on the reviewers' recommendations, authors will be notified of the review process (Accept submission ; accept with minor revisions ; resubmit for review ; decline submission), including the reviewers' reports and comments.

Authors must revise their papers accordingly in four weeks’ time. A letter explaining the changes made can also be included. Authors are required to respond to critical or disfavourable reviews, by addressing the main points raised by the reviewer.

The reviewers’ recommendations will always be taken in consideration; however, editors will make the final decision on the publication of the paper, and the author will be informed.

All the communication will be to the email account used to submit the paper to the journal.

 

Publication Frequency

The OSLS will publish one volume per year, with issues published bimonthly. Further issues can be published.

Issues will be published on the first day of February, April, June, August, October, and December.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Charges

The IISL is a non-profit organisation, and Oñati Socio-legal Series does not take any publication charge from the authors.

 

Ethics and Responsibility

The International Institute for the Sociology of Law is committed to upholding the integrity of the work we publish. The value of academic publishing relies on everyone involved behaving ethically. The following points are intended to give a broad overview on our policy. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact the Editor of Oñati Socio-legal Series (hereinafter, “OSLS” or “the journal”).

Ethical issues to consider

Authors:
• Originality and plagiarism: Authors must ensure that their work is original and entirely written by them. Where the works or words of others or of their own published writing have been used, the sources must be clearly cited or quoted, following the style guidelines recommended by OSLS, or appropriately acknowledged, and appropriate permission must be obtained where necessary.
• Research Ethics: Authors should ensure that research presented in the article has been conducted in accordance with appropriate ethical guidelines, either of their institution or of their discipline, such as the International Sociological Association.
• Rights: Their work must not infringe on any rights of others, including privacy rights and intellectual property rights.
• Data presentation, access, and retention: The data must be true and research results must be presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation. Such data must be the authors’ own or they must where necessary have permission to use data reproduced in their paper. Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data.
• Presentation of research: Research methods should be described clearly and unambiguously so that findings can be confirmed by others.
• Disclosure and conflicts of interest: Any real or apparent conflicting or competing interest must be clearly stated in the paper, including sources of funding or other support for the research.
• Significant errors in published works: If an author subsequently discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to contact the Journal to identify and correct the error or inaccuracy, and cooperate with the Journal to retract or correct the paper.
• Authorship of the paper must be accurately represented, so that all individuals that participated in the actual authorship of the work, and only those persons, are properly credited as authors, and that all who participated have given consent for publication and representation as authors.

Reviewers must:

• Maintain the confidentiality of the review process.
• Immediately alert the Journal of any real or potential competing interest that could affect the impartiality of their reviewing and decline to review where appropriate.
• Conduct themselves fairly and impartially.
• Write their reviews in an honest but courteous and respectful manner, avoiding the use of inappropriate, demeaning, or potentially offensive language, both in the review and in the confidential comments to the editor(s) that they may make. Regardless of the overall recommendation for the paper, we encourage constructive criticism that enriches the paper and helps the authors to improve their work.
• Oñati Socio-legal Series encourages use of gender-neutral language, which has been proposed to reduce both discrimination and gender stereotyping. When in doubt, reviewers are invited to refer to the editor.

Issue Editors must:

• Maintain and promote consistent ethical policies for their journal issue.
• Oversee and act to enforce those policies as needed in a fair and consistent manner.
• Exercise the highest standards of personal integrity in their work as editor of the journal, recognising and planning for instances where they could have a competing interest or the appearance of a competing interest.



Oñati Socio-Legal Series | OSLS | ISSN: 2079-5971 http://opo.iisj.net/
Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law - Instituto Internacional de Sociología Jurídica de Oñati
Antigua Universidad s/n - Apdo. 28 - 20560 Oñati - Gipuzkoa - Spain
T: (+34) 943 783064 F: (+34) 943 783147 E: opo@iisj.es

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License.